IfAt1st
Starter
I just got a question for y'all -I'll never, ever, ever, support resting/sitting a player who can play and can give it a go without risking further injury unless we have no foundation and are tanking to acquire one.
As a fan, I'm supposed to go along with the idea a guy who just put up 39/20 and it could easily have been 45/20, should or would sit for a game or two? To experiment? What bleeping experiment is worth sitting your franchise player? Why the bleep would you run such an experiment in the first place? Affirming Cuz's +/-?
That's a tank move. You don't sit a top 10 player who can play so you can experiment without him unless you have ulterior motives, i.e. tanking.
How you gonna stop god's plan?
How you gonna do that?
How you gonna do that, that's what I want to know - how you gonna stop god's plan?
rain - you (and others) may not approve of it, but it's been very clear that the Kings have been tanking for quite some time this year.
I even predicted this last Thursday after the 4-win streak, it was that obvious.
How are y'all gonna stop (The Kings) plans (to tank)?