bazam!
Yep, just another check-box "checked" in the "NBA process" - I think Seattle really doesn't understand how this works.
bazam!
My problem with this is the term Sonics fan. there are no Sonics, therefore there are no Sonics fans, just like there are no Houston Oilers Fans or Chicago Stags fans. You can call your self a Grifindor Quiddich fan, but if you can't go to or watch a game it just makes you sad person in a t-shirt ranting.Sonics fans are now pinning their hopes on the NBA allowing Hansen to buy the team in Sacramento, trying "earnestly" to get an arena deal done and then moving it. ...
In my experience Seattle views itself as on par with NY and LA as a market when reality puts them much closer to Sac than they would be comfortable admitting (and yes, I am in Portland, huge Timbers supporter and therefore have a huge bias against a certain fishy team up North and its customer base, so take with a grain of salt if you must).I think I was trying to be polite to Glenn's first post on Sonics fans... As someone who has avidly read Sonicsfalling and other boards, they have struck me as particularly egotistical and somewhat callous. It's like many of them outright dismiss Sacramento as a market, and its fans, and felt entitled to the team with not the proper empathy or remorse for anyone on the other end. I can't imagine the community of folks on here behaving the same way if we were poaching another city's baseball team from its fans. I want to make clear that there are good people everywhere, its just the % was not what I would have liked to have seen from the Seattle market during this saga
My problem with this is the term Sonics fan. there are no Sonics, therefore there are no Sonics fans, just like there are no Houston Oilers Fans or Chicago Stags fans. You can call your self a Grifindor Quiddich fan, but if you can't go to or watch a game it just makes you sad person in a t-shirt ranting.
Yep, just another check-box "checked" in the "NBA process" - I think Seattle really doesn't understand how this works.
"That just means the Sac Kings group only has half the money. They're probably scrambling for more whales as we speak." - WAG @ typical sonicssinking response.Yep, just another check-box "checked" in the "NBA process" - I think Seattle really doesn't understand how this works.
I would consider my self a former Kings fan. Or perhaps a NBA fan (I do not live in Sac) I hold that words have meanings and those meanings have consequences. When people mal-use or manipulate language I call foul. I have no trouble with the term Seattle fans and that is the one I use. The issue is one of acceptance of reality. I have said repeatedly that they have my sympathy, for losing their team, but that does not give them the right to abuse my language and there by attempt to abuse my mind. BTW on the rarest of occasions I am forced to get coffee at a Starbuck's I order a "biggest cup you have" for the same reason.What would you have called yourself if the Kings had become the Sonics? The team moving away doesn't erase the past. I think we have reason to criticize anyone calling themselves a fan of the Seattle SuperSonics who lacks the empathy to understand that losing the Kings would be just as painful to us as losing their team was to them. But if we can't extend them the same courtesy, then we lose our right to criticize as well.
I would consider my self a former Kings fan. Or perhaps a NBA fan (I do not live in Sac) I hold that words have meanings and those meanings have consequences. When people mal-use or manipulate language I call foul. I have no trouble with the term Seattle fans and that is the one I use. The issue is one of acceptance of reality. I have said repeatedly that they have my sympathy, for losing their team, but that does not give them the right to abuse my language and there by attempt to abuse my mind. BTW on the rarest of occasions I am forced to get coffee at a Starbuck's I order a "biggest cup you have" for the same reason.
-
LOL, I will use their stupid venti word, but they are the only place. I take my son to Jamba Juice pretty regularly and we always share a large, not power or whatever they call it. Same with Coldstone's but the one by our house shut down.I would consider my self a former Kings fan. Or perhaps a NBA fan (I do not live in Sac) I hold that words have meanings and those meanings have consequences. When people mal-use or manipulate language I call foul. I have no trouble with the term Seattle fans and that is the one I use. The issue is one of acceptance of reality. I have said repeatedly that they have my sympathy, for losing their team, but that does not give them the right to abuse my language and there by attempt to abuse my mind. BTW on the rarest of occasions I am forced to get coffee at a Starbuck's I order a "biggest cup you have" for the same reason.
-
I say, "I am sorry, I don't speak Starbucks."Then what do you say when they try to correct you, as I'm sure they do?![]()
What would you have called yourself if the Kings had become the Sonics? The team moving away doesn't erase the past. I think we have reason to criticize anyone calling themselves a fan of the Seattle SuperSonics who lacks the empathy to understand that losing the Kings would be just as painful to us as losing their team was to them. But if we can't extend them the same courtesy, then we lose our right to criticize as well.
My Grandpa was a huge Saint Louis Browns fan back in the day. When they moved to Baltimore, he became a baseball fan without a team. He was no longer a Browns fan because they no longer existed (from his point of view).
Glad this board seems to agree with what I've been thinking. It' politically correct to say "I hope Seattle gets a team," but I couldn't care less. The only thing I have time to worry about is keeping the team we already have. Seattle is trying to make their problem, my problem and that doesn't fly with me. It makes them the enemy. I have no sympathy for Seattle when it comes to the NBA and I'm tired of hearing them whine and play the victim role.
I do "hope Seattle gets a team", if they are gonna run the team the same way they act now: willing to spend a lot if they get the product. Then they are going to be a net plus in revenue sharing and will be an LT payer, which Sacramento as recepient can only welcome.Glad this board seems to agree with what I've been thinking. It' politically correct to say "I hope Seattle gets a team," but I couldn't care less. The only thing I have time to worry about is keeping the team we already have. Seattle is trying to make their problem, my problem and that doesn't fly with me. It makes them the enemy. I have no sympathy for Seattle when it comes to the NBA and I'm tired of hearing them whine and play the victim role.
I do "hope Seattle gets a team", if they are gonna run the team the same way they act now: willing to spend a lot if they get the product. Then they are going to be a net plus in revenue sharing and will be an LT payer, which Sacramento as recepient can only welcome.
... a source says the league is encouraging a Sacramento business group to put 100 percent of its $341 million team purchase offer into an escrow account in hopes of persuading the Maloof family, team owners, to sign a deal with the local group.
...
Ranadive's group already has put 50 percent of its team purchase offer into an escrow account, sources said. Putting the entire amount down would help "alleviate the Maloofs' concern, and greatly increase the likelihood a deal could get done," the source said.
...
“@Ryan_Lillis: NBA encouraging Sacramento suitors for #NBAKings to put entire purchase price in escrow, source says http://sacb.ee/10rTJzw ”
Aaron Bruski ‏@aaronbruski 24m
Asked about the KJR Radio report in SEA that the SAC group is short on $$, multiple league sources said that's not the case
There's a big difference between a report that the Sac group is short on money and looking for investors and a report that the Maloofs are worried that the Sac group is short on money and are asking for the full amount in escrow.Well I guess Mitch was right if NBA is saying that they are making the Sac group to show it has the money.
There's a big difference between a report that the Sac group is short on money and looking for investors and a report that the Maloofs are worried that the Sac group is short on money and are asking for the full amount in escrow.
There's no reason to think he was right.
Well I guess Mitch was right if NBA is saying that they are making the Sac group to show it has the money.
Making a buyer put 100% in escrow before an agreement is signed is very unusual in almost any business, but NOTHING about this deal has been normal. If the theory is put the money in the bank to shut the Maloofs up and maybe they be reasonable, I doubt it will work. The Maloofs are taking their orders from the Hedge Fund Pirate so I suspect once the amount of money in the account is made public the story will be "HB are willing to pay more" This crap will not end until the Pirate is told point blank to knock it off or will not only never get a team he will be banned from every arena in the league.
Making a buyer put 100% in escrow before an agreement is signed is very unusual in almost any business, but NOTHING about this deal has been normal. If the theory is put the money in the bank to shut the Maloofs up and maybe they be reasonable, I doubt it will work. The Maloofs are taking their orders from the Hedge Fund Pirate so I suspect once the amount of money in the account is made public the story will be "HB are willing to pay more" This crap will not end until the Pirate is told point blank to knock it off or will not only never get a team he will be banned from every arena in the league.