The question for me with Mitchell is the same question I have of Monk - can he play PG? If Monk can't play PG more or less full time then I don't hav much interest.
If Mitchell can't play PG - at least some of the time - then I'd still have interest but not as much. As a SG he's undersized and relying on his wingspan and strength/atleticism to match up with opposing 2's. As a PG he is potentially physically dominant and able to switch on to SGs as well.
If Mitchell can't play PG - at least some of the time - then I'd still have interest but not as much. As a SG he's undersized and relying on his wingspan and strength/atleticism to match up with opposing 2's. As a PG he is potentially physically dominant and able to switch on to SGs as well.
If it comes down to Frank N (age 18.8) vs Donovan (20.7) at #10 I'd rather have Donovan who is older and far more physically and probably emotionally mature to contribute sooner.
The other variables to consider is that if we do get Fox at #5 and Bogdan signs, this discussion is moot since Fox and Bogdan and perhaps a FA will take up all the minutes at PG. Only if we draft Isaac or Tatum at #5 and we are sitting at #10 with decision to take a big (Lauri, Collins) a guard (Frank, Donovan) or trade down, does the comparison have any relevance. Of all these options I know what I would do.... Welcome to the team, Lillard 2.0