Dime Dropper
All-Star
So we a get an insurance policy at the 2-guard, but who is the backup 3? D-Will? Heaven forbid. Stauskas? Don't want to go there. Hmmm.
I'd prefer both of those guys backing up the 3 than Outlaw.
So we a get an insurance policy at the 2-guard, but who is the backup 3? D-Will? Heaven forbid. Stauskas? Don't want to go there. Hmmm.
So we a get an insurance policy at the 2-guard, but who is the backup 3? D-Will? Heaven forbid. Stauskas? Don't want to go there. Hmmm.
I'd prefer both of those guys backing up the 3 than Outlaw.
If turning over the roster is the goal, they are succeeding wildly. If winning games is the goal, we'll have to wait and see on that one.
I guess Casspi is the guy. At least Outlaw can play in the NBA, but D-Will could go D-League or international.
Well, Rudy's probably getting a cool 35 mpg so it's not like we'll need a super duper top flight 3 man backing him up.I guess Casspi is the guy. At least Outlaw can play in the NBA, but D-Will could go D-League or international.
Casspi/T-Will!If turning over the roster is the goal, they are succeeding wildly. If winning games is the goal, we'll have to wait and see on that one.
What do you need T-Will for when you have Ellington? They are not the same but a slot is a slot.Casspi/T-Will!
Waiving Tyler who has unguaranteed contract opens up one spot and keeps us under the luxury tax treshold.
What do you need T-Will for when you have Ellington? They are not the same but a slot is a slot.
Come on he is at least better than jimmer.Ellington is a scrub however. And a one dimensional one. He can shoot, but he basically is miserable at everything else on basketball court. TWill is the opposite. General named position or not, it would be hard to find two guys more opposite, and hence there is likely room and a use for both if we are still making roster moves, which I assume we are.
Come on he is at least better than jimmer.
What do you need T-Will for when you have Ellington? They are not the same but a slot is a slot.
he's bigger than Jimmer, which is the key that gives him a real position.
Then again he can't dribble/create, so no I'm not really sure he is better than Jimmer. Possibly of slightly more use, and more aware that he sucks so its not like all the chucking guards Petrie wasted his time stacking up: this one will at least mind his role. Nonetheless this is a guy who averaged 3.2pts in 9min of garbagetime last year. Hard to get more scrubby than that.
To say they aren't the same is an understatement. They are completely different players.
Williams has about an inch and 20lbs on Ellington. And beyond that he's faster, quicker, stronger etc. Depending on match ups TWill can guard some opposings SFs. I wouldn't ever want to see Ellington in that position. I remember being really surprised at Ellington's vertical measurements at the combine because he never showed any kind of in-game leaping ability at UNC. He's a good catch and shoot role player but he won't give you any more than that. He's got a slight frame, below average quickness, and no real handle to speak of. Williams on the other hand does pretty much everything BUT shoot it well. He's a good defender, ball handler, passer, can attack the rim and is a good rebounder for his size/position.
If you want a shooter on the deep bench who understands his role and limitations, Ellington isn't a bad 5th or 6th guard to have. On the other hand, Terrence Williams is a legit triple double threat whose real weaknesses seem to be behind the scenes/attitude problems. If he ever got his head on right and/or got onto a veteran team with a strong culture he could be dynamite.
Personally I'd rather gamble on Williams. At worst you cut him and get zero production compared to Ellington's projected next to nothing production. But at best you have a really versatile swingman off the bench that can help with team ball movement AND defense.
I get the distinction you guys are making. Williams is bigger and more versatile. Defender vs. Scorer. We need both. If we have only Ben or Nik going forward, which of toe vets do want to be pinch starters or even more. Referring to Brick's reference to Ellington as a scrub, can't the two be characterized as: Ellington, a scrub who couldn't make on a roster on his strength, offensive capabilities, and Williams, a scrub who couldn't make it on a roster on his strength, defensive capabilities? Semantics, I know, but somewhat accurate, and we sure as hell don't want both of them.
Your position is clear and logical. For my part I'll leave it to Kings to decide. By the way, I don't like calling anI definitely wouldn't consider Williams a scrub. And I wouldn't say his strength is necessarily defense. He can defend, rebound, handle the ball, pass, and attack the basket. I don't like referring to anyone talented enough to make it to the highest level of his sport as a scrub, but Ellington IS a marginal NBA talent. Williams is not a marginal talent. He's a gifted player. Instead his issue is that he appears to be a head case. That said, if DeMarcus is endorsing him, I say absolutely sign Twill over Ellington.
T-Will, all issues aside is far more talented player than Ellington. Better ball handler, passer, defender, rebounder and can play and guard miltiple positions. Ellington in a one dimentional shooter and undersized at that. If anything, you need someone like T-Will to set up the likes of Ellington and McLemoreWhat do you need T-Will for when you have Ellington? They are not the same but a slot is a slot.
Other than a few hints on twitter or instagram, no one knows. There was report that he had a workout lined up with the kings last week.Did TWill actually tryout in front of the FO?
T-Will, all issues aside is far more talented player than Ellington. Better ball handler, passer, defender, rebounder and can play and guard miltiple positions. Ellington in a one dimentional shooter and undersized at that. If anything, you need someone like T-Will to set up the likes of Ellington and McLemore
Yeah. T-Will is versatile enough to play emergency minutes at PG if need be (though it's certainly not ideal). I definitely remember him running the team as the "PG" with Jimmer as the off-guard his last season with us. If -and this is, of course, a big if- he's got his head on straight, he's a talented jack-of-all-trades guy who would have a role on just about any team in the league.
In his time with us, T-Will's per-36 statistics were absolutely eye-popping (not that his normal stats were all that terrible either): 15.5 ppg, 7.2 rpg, 5.4 apg, 1.6 spg, .6 bpg.
To put things in perspective, here are Lance Stephenson's numbers per-36 minutes this season:
14.1 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 4.7 apg, .7 spg, .1 bpg.
Now obviously their situations are completely different, with Lance's numbers coming as a 3rd/4th option on a team dominated by Paul George (get well soon, buddy) and Frank Vogel's super disciplined system (until Andrew Bynum had to come in and mess everything up) and T-Will getting his stats courtesy of Keith Smart's system, AKA sheer anarchy, and off the bench.
But the point ultimately is this: T-Will has the talent and the skills (well, maybe not 3-pt shooting) to help this team improve. The team just has to save him from himself (which is easier to do when Michael Malone is your head coach, Tyrone Corbin is your lead assistant, and you have two hall of famers in your front office than it is when the Maloofs are trying to move the team every ten seconds).