Can I go ahead and express my discontent with both the Ben Linus and Michael Corleone picks? This is a SUPERvillain draft. Just drafting cunning people from media I don't think fulfills the rules of the draft. Not that I want them to re-pick, I'm just saying that they are definitely not worthy of my vote, even if I was non-partisan.
I mean seriously, Ben Linus and Corleone can barely be considered villians, let alone supervillainns. This is getting stupid.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
the rules carry no 'super' qualifications, and actually don't discern what qualifications a pick should have, only stating:
Again, not that I want the picks to be discounted, and I do think they are clever, its just that those ones in particular seem to stick out as not really being villains in one way or the other.
I mean seriously, Ben Linus and Corleone can barely be considered villians, let alone supervillainns. This is getting stupid.
the rules carry no 'super' qualifications, and actually don't discern what qualifications a pick should have, only stating:
1. a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; scoundrel.
2. a character in a play, novel, or the like, who constitutes an important evil agency in the plot.
2. a character in a play, novel, or the like, who constitutes an important evil agency in the plot.
Last edited: