Kings active in trade talks?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd like to see us try for Lowry and Amir Johnson, who I think both could be potential pieces in the future at PG and PF. If they're looking for straight expirings, Salmons, Patterson, and Vasquez could do the trick. Not sure how Jimmer fits into all of that... although Lowry/Johnson/Gray for Patterson/Salmons/Vasquez/Jimmer works on the trade machine.
Lowry is an expiring already and is just good enough to get us more wins that we don't want this year. Assuming we don't end up drafting Smart or Exum, he is target #1 in the offseason for me.

Amir Johnson has been going downhill rapidly since he entered the league. His block rate, rebound rate, and points per 36 have all declined steadily since his third year. I haven't seen enough of him to know whether he is any better than Jason Thompson at this point, but the statistics say no.
 
I'm actually beginning to raise a red flag on all these let's get Wiggins/Parker talks. Maybe its just living in the East, but I don't think Sacramento fans understand just how completely abysmal the entire Eastern Conference is. If Sac wins 30, they might be the 10th seed and have a 5% chance at one of those guys. As I said during the summer when it became apparent there was some thought hat way from our front office, its a fools gamble. I like tanking. Tanking is GOOD at a certain stage of a franchise's life cycle. Tanking can win titles in the end. But trying to outtank half the league who are also all tanking at the same time gets to be nearly impossible. Certianly doubling down on the idea you are going to be able to outtank a dozen other teams and starting to mess up your development process planning for future stars you may not be able to get gets dubious in a hurry.
Except that the East all have to play eastern conference teams 52 times each, meaning that somebody is going to have to win those games between boston, orlando, detroit, New York, Brooklyn, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and etc. The Kings get to lose all they want to the 12 Western Conference teams trying for the playoffs. Advantage Kings.
 
I'm actually beginning to raise a red flag on all these let's get Wiggins/Parker talks. Maybe its just living in the East, but I don't think Sacramento fans understand just how completely abysmal the entire Eastern Conference is. If Sac wins 30, they might be the 10th seed and have a 5% chance at one of those guys. As I said during the summer when it became apparent there was some thought hat way from our front office, its a fools gamble. I like tanking. Tanking is GOOD at a certain stage of a franchise's life cycle. Tanking can win titles in the end. But trying to outtank half the league who are also all tanking at the same time gets to be nearly impossible. Certianly doubling down on the idea you are going to be able to outtank a dozen other teams and starting to mess up your development process planning for future stars you may not be able to get gets dubious in a hurry.
well, the good news is that eastern conference teams have to play each other four times per season. somebody has to win those games, and several of the league's worst will avoid the lottery altogether in spite of their desire to tank. again, somebody has to take those playoff spots. inevitably, it will be quite the scrum for lottery positioning among the bottom-7 out east, but the kings are also gonna be too busy getting pummeled by the many heavy-weights out west to notice...

for all the bluster about how terrible the eastern conference is, the kings still have the fourth-worst record in the nba, at the moment. it's not as if they've been a strong road team in recent memory, either, and i wouldn't expect that to change just because the eastern conference sucks more than usual. the kings likely won't become world-beaters out east when they eventually begin the more travel-heavy portions of their schedule. they'll hang tight in some games, win a few they were expected to lose, and lose plenty that they probably should be able to win. losing teams with an utter lack of talent are like that...

edit: whoops. looks like Hadlowe beat me to the very point i was trying to make:
Except that the East all have to play eastern conference teams 52 times each, meaning that somebody is going to have to win those games between boston, orlando, detroit, New York, Brooklyn, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and etc. The Kings get to lose all they want to the 12 Western Conference teams trying for the playoffs. Advantage Kings.
 
Marc Stein: Hearing this strong: Rockets determined to trade Omer Asik by Dec. 19 at latest and have ramped up discussions with potential trade partners - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

Sam Amick: If Houston can't find lottery pick for Asik, rival teams under impression they're also on the lookout for high-level power forward - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

What's the max you guys give for Asik? IT+Salmons? IT+JT? Ben in any deal?
 
Marc Stein: Hearing this strong: Rockets determined to trade Omer Asik by Dec. 19 at latest and have ramped up discussions with potential trade partners - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

Sam Amick: If Houston can't find lottery pick for Asik, rival teams under impression they're also on the lookout for high-level power forward - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

What's the max you guys give for Asik? IT+Salmons? IT+JT? Ben in any deal?
it's an interesting question, because asik very much represents the defensive/rebounding presence in the middle that many of us have been clamoring for. however, there are legitimate questions about how effective cousins/asik would be as a frontcourt pairing, and if malone were to decide to bench asik in favor of a "stretch 4" in williams or patterson, how would asik respond? would he throw a massive hissy fit, as he did in houston from the moment the rockets acquired dwight howard? he doesn't seem to deal well with being told his place in the pecking order. that said, i'd be more than willing to part with any combination of kings outside of cousins/mclemore/2014 first rounder, because asik represents a very valuable asset, and would instantly become the team's greatest trade chip upon acquisition (outside of the aforementioned cousins/mclemore/2014 first rounder)...
 
Marc Stein: Hearing this strong: Rockets determined to trade Omer Asik by Dec. 19 at latest and have ramped up discussions with potential trade partners - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

Sam Amick: If Houston can't find lottery pick for Asik, rival teams under impression they're also on the lookout for high-level power forward - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

What's the max you guys give for Asik? IT+Salmons? IT+JT? Ben in any deal?
I would assume that Patterson has to be part of any deal with Houston for Asik. You can bundle up Patterson and JT for Asik and call it a day, relying on Chuck Hayes as third big for the time being with Derrick Williams sliding over to the 4 when necessarry.

Whether we can match other teams is the question. Asik for Milsap could realistically happen and result in both teams becoming better.
 
Williams quickness should bother 4s, don't you think? My question with him at 4 has more to do with strength. I'd like to see him against a powerful 4, say Zach Randolph, and see how he would do. I don't know whether Randolph would abuse him in the post or not. (I'll go out on the limb and say that with our current roster, Randolph wouldn't abuse him anymore than anybody else we have on this roster). It's an open question for me; I just haven't seen enough of Williams to make a judgement on that. As far as taking shots away from Cousins, I guess I'm somewhat skeptical on that point. Good teams have a lot of guys that can score. And good teams are unselfish enough to get the ball to the guy that should get the ball. Yes, if DeRozan is truly a selfish player, then absolutely it would not work because by definition he would want to be the #1 guy. If, on the other hand, he really does want to win, and is willing to sacrifice his shooting attempts in order to win, then it might work.

One more thing. You (and others) seem to be saying that you can't pair athletic guys with Cousins because they will leave him in the dust on the offensive end from the fast break basketball they are good at. I don't subscribe to that point of view. I've seen Laker teams with Kareem Abduhl Jabbar on them that were fantastic fast breaking teams. If those teams can run and win championships, the Kings could do the same.
Without Kareem's outlet passes, blocked shots, and rebounding that whole thing didn't work.
 
Marc Stein: Hearing this strong: Rockets determined to trade Omer Asik by Dec. 19 at latest and have ramped up discussions with potential trade partners - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

Sam Amick: If Houston can't find lottery pick for Asik, rival teams under impression they're also on the lookout for high-level power forward - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

What's the max you guys give for Asik? IT+Salmons? IT+JT? Ben in any deal?
I don't think we have a high level pf unless you want to trade cousins.
 
I don't think we have a high level pf unless you want to trade cousins.
Hou will soon realize they have absolutely 0 leverage. Asik is a 1 and 1/2 season rental and while his cap hit is $8.3 mil next season, he costs an owner $15mil in actual money. While Asik is very good, I just don't see who gives up the farm for such a limited offensive player.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
Marc Stein: Hearing this strong: Rockets determined to trade Omer Asik by Dec. 19 at latest and have ramped up discussions with potential trade partners - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

Sam Amick: If Houston can't find lottery pick for Asik, rival teams under impression they're also on the lookout for high-level power forward - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm#sthash.BndLM0Vx.dpuf

What's the max you guys give for Asik? IT+Salmons? IT+JT? Ben in any deal?
Anyone but Cuz and MLM.

BTW, I don't think Hou will get the offers they want or expect. When Asik has publicly demanded a trade more than once and the whole league knows they're shopping him, partly by force, the offers almost always in a situation like this are lower. The league knows Hou pretty much has to trade him or he'll become a distraction, if he already isn't and will be one unhappy camper in the locker room.
 
Hou will soon realize they have absolutely 0 leverage. Asik is a 1 and 1/2 season rental and while his cap hit is $8.3 mil next season, he costs an owner $15mil in actual money. While Asik is very good, I just don't see who gives up the farm for such a limited offensive player.
I agree, but they can do better than what we have. And I'm not sure Asik fits as part of a rebuild.
 
If we consider Cousins, Ben and our picks as untouchable, our most attractive piece is IT. Houston has depth at that position.
Any combination of 2nd round picks and players not Cuz or Ben to get Asik.
Might have to get a 3rd team involved to get a team interested in IT, since Hou has depth as you said.
 
If your of the belief that Greivis isn't a good enough all around player to be a part of the future his only purpose becomes helping us gain needless wins with his experience and not letting us see what Ray Mac can do. That is if you don't believe he will be re-signed
 
Just think of all the things that PD'A has to think about and consider starting before breakfast every day. How to juggle pineapples and peal potatoes with his toes at the same time. Coming up with all these good ideas on here is a lark, for him it is deadly serious.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Its rumored that the Miami Heat are looking to trade for a SG because of having to play Wade limited minutes. Sounds like a perfect fit for Thornton, except, I'm not sure what they have to trade that we'd want, and would fit salary wise. I suppose some combination of Chalmers and Battier or Anthony would work. But then what would they do to replace Chalmers. The Heat do have two first round picks in the upcoming draft, so getting one of them might also be a possibility.
 
Its rumored that the Miami Heat are looking to trade for a SG because of having to play Wade limited minutes. Sounds like a perfect fit for Thornton, except, I'm not sure what they have to trade that we'd want, and would fit salary wise. I suppose some combination of Chalmers and Battier or Anthony would work. But then what would they do to replace Chalmers. The Heat do have two first round picks in the upcoming draft, so getting one of them might also be a possibility.
Interesting thought, but what about Ray Allen. I thought he was their backup SG?
 
Its rumored that the Miami Heat are looking to trade for a SG because of having to play Wade limited minutes. Sounds like a perfect fit for Thornton, except, I'm not sure what they have to trade that we'd want, and would fit salary wise. I suppose some combination of Chalmers and Battier or Anthony would work. But then what would they do to replace Chalmers. The Heat do have two first round picks in the upcoming draft, so getting one of them might also be a possibility.
Like to have Battier, solid veteran presence, 3 pt shooter and a defensive wing player. Anthony is also a defensive big.
 
K

KingMilz

Guest
I would love Chalmers as the starting PG if we move Vasquez and him and Isaiah are actually capable of playing together as well. Good shooter and above average defender and does not need the ball to score but is more than capable enough with it perfect fit if we building around Godsins.
 
Do you guys think Thornton has made himself nearly untradeable? He really doesn't bring anything to the game at this point. Honestly his defense has been the best part of his game this year. That is how far his offense has fallen. Why would a team want to trade anything for a shooter who can't shoot and doesn't really bring much of anything else to the table? Unless a team is banking on him returning to his former self, I don't see him having any trade value at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.