Would you....

You do realize that the moment that KG puts Kings uniform on - he will have a microfracture surgery on a knie of Your choice
 
You do realize that the moment that KG puts Kings uniform on - he will have a microfracture surgery on a knie of Your choice

Well sure, but so will anyone else we get, so I figured might as well start with somebody really good + tall. ;)
 
Last edited:
The problem is what do you do when Ron blows up(you KNOW he will) and you're left with Bibby/KG and they're both aging. You've lost your future and you're only a pretender now, not a contender.
 
Pretty big risk. It could be another major setback in rebuilding if they don't win within the 1-3 years that team would be a contender.

I would have to say no. But I am sure deals like that or for a guy like Jermaine O'neal will be considered.
 
I'm sorry, how has Garnett not shown he's a leader? Because his team hasn't won anything?

How about bringing a level of intensity to every play we haven't had all season. Or handeling himself with class, dignity and loyalty while stuck with a completely inept GM and organization. He plays on All-Madden level no matter what the situation is, rarely is injured and truely shows a respect for his teammates, fans and the game.

He single-handedly took the T-Wolves to a string of playoffs when they had no business being anywhere but the lottery. And the one time he actually got help, they went to the WCF.

Bibby's a side kick and Artest is insane, so you'll get no arguement from me on that duo.

But there is no single archetype of leadership -- and KG undoubtedly leads by example.

Being against the trade idea because it delays rebuilding even longer for a risky "Win Now" situation that could blow up in our face is perfectly fine.

But KG's leadership qualities should not be among the sticking points.


I have heard enough things about KG and his personality to know that he isn't as squeaky clean as you think.
 
The problem is what do you do when Ron blows up(you KNOW he will) and you're left with Bibby/KG and they're both aging. You've lost your future and you're only a pretender now, not a contender.


If KG was brought in I think Artest would do all he could to not blow up.

I think people are underestimating a team of Artest/Bibby/KG. If it works it's not even a question of being a contender. No way no how. That is probably the deadliest threesome in the league, easy.
 
I'm sorry, how has Garnett not shown he's a leader? Because his team hasn't won anything?

How about bringing a level of intensity to every play we haven't had all season. Or handeling himself with class, dignity and loyalty while stuck with a completely inept GM and organization. He plays on All-Madden level no matter what the situation is, rarely is injured and truely shows a respect for his teammates, fans and the game.

He single-handedly took the T-Wolves to a string of playoffs when they had no business being anywhere but the lottery. And the one time he actually got help, they went to the WCF.

Bibby's a side kick and Artest is insane, so you'll get no arguement from me on that duo.

But there is no single archetype of leadership -- and KG undoubtedly leads by example.

Being against the trade idea because it delays rebuilding even longer for a risky "Win Now" situation that could blow up in our face is perfectly fine.

But KG's leadership qualities should not be among the sticking points.

I hate to answer a question with a question, but when has he shown leadership? He "carried" his team to a series of first round defeats. I suppose that makes Pau Gasol a leader as well. Garnett is all pomp and circumstance. He yells a lot, stares a lot, tries to look mean, and blocks shots after the whistle. I guess that proves his intensity, but not leadership. Understand that we are talking about a man who has been a perennial MVP candidate for the past 8 years, and won one. He is also, allegedly, still in his prime. Yet his team has been mired in the lottery for the past three years. I don't care how tough the West is or how inept his GM, MVPs in their prime do not spend three straight years in the lottery. If he was a true leader then there is no way, no way, that his team would have been beat out for the #8 spot by the mess of a team we had last year.

You'll reply that he's worn out, coasting perhaps, waiting for his team to surround him with talent. Then he's not a leader. Garnett has not won a championship for the same reason Barkley never did, he's not a true leader, and he doesn't want it enough. He doesn't put in enough work in the weight room, as he still has the upper body of a nineteen year old boy. I suspect his base is weak as well, but we'll never know with the petal pushers he calls shorts. It kills me that show-offs like Garnett and Noah are lauded for their leadership, while men who quietly make the plays that decide games, such as Oden or Jeff Green, are diminished for their "lack of intensity".

Like another poster said, I don't see why Garnett-Artest-Bibby will work where Garnett-Sprewell-Cassell failed. It's essentially the same triumvirate, only Garnett is older, Artest less offensively talented, and Bibby half the man that Cassell is.
 
Garnett has not won a championship for the same reason Barkley never did, he's not a true leader, and he doesn't want it enough.

Wow. And all this time I'd thought Barkley didn't have a ring because Jordan's Bulls were hogging them all.
 
Like another poster said, I don't see why Garnett-Artest-Bibby will work where Garnett-Sprewell-Cassell failed. It's essentially the same triumvirate, only Garnett is older, Artest less offensively talented, and Bibby half the man that Cassell is.

Garnett is still Garnett...aka the best power forward in the league. If artest can keep himself together, he's better then Sprewell was. As for Bibby vs. Sam-I-Am...what are you talking about?
 
Garnett is still Garnett...aka the best power forward in the league. If artest can keep himself together, he's better then Sprewell was. As for Bibby vs. Sam-I-Am...what are you talking about?


There are these 2 guys... Duncan and Dirk. I think you've heard of them also...
 
You do realize that the moment that KG puts Kings uniform on - he will have a microfracture surgery on a knie of Your choice

do you suppose that, instead of scrubs, microfracture doctors walk around sporting kings jerseys?? :p

i wouldn't do this scenario of trades, without first considering a coaching change. no way musselman can do anything with a KG on the roster except pee him off.
 
2) That team is 15-20 wins better than this one, guaranteed. What is not guaranteed is whether it is a title team. Actually not quite guaranteed simply because of the Artest factor.
keep in mind... KG keeps the crazies in check!

this would be great depending on the draft pick and if we could somehow do it without losing Martin
 
I don't see why the T-Wolves would do this. Yes they would get a mid-lotto pick and K-Mart, but they are taking on awful contracts in Miller and KT. I'd imagine they want both expirings and young players/picks, not K-Mart, a pick, and a bunch of overpaid junk.
 
Miller isn't really that bad of a contract. Given the right situation Miller will be well worth the money being paid. I actually would love him on the Kings if paired with a defensive minded PF, or move Miller to PF, and get a defensive minded center.

Imagen if we got Oden, and put him with Miller. We would go from a crappy front court to a great one, because Miller would go from being exploited nightly because of lack of big man help, to a out-top/post/passing big man...
 
What if the Kings offered something like this?

Kings deal:
Brad Miller
Kenny Thomas
John Salmons
2007 1st round pick (top 3 protection)
2009 1st round pick (top 3 protection)
2011 1st round pick (top 3 protection)

Wolves deal:
Kevin Garnett

Think they'd bite on that? 3 1st round picks with only top 3 protection.


Then trade Shareef for Etan/Haywood
Re-sign Price/Williams/Williamson
Use MLE and LLE to fill out roster needs, Joe Smith for the LLE?

Kings roster:

C: Etan Thomas, Justin Williams
PF: Kevin Garnett, Joe Smith, Corliss Williamson
SF: Ron Artest, Francisco Garcia
SG: Kevin Martin, Quincy Douby
PG: Mike Bibby, Ronnie Price
 
What if the Kings offered something like this?

Kings deal:
Brad Miller
Kenny Thomas
John Salmons
2007 1st round pick (top 3 protection)
2009 1st round pick (top 3 protection)
2011 1st round pick (top 3 protection)

Wolves deal:
Kevin Garnett

Think they'd bite on that? 3 1st round picks with only top 3 protection.


Then trade Shareef for Etan/Haywood
Re-sign Price/Williams/Williamson
Use MLE and LLE to fill out roster needs, Joe Smith for the LLE?

Kings roster:

C: Etan Thomas, Justin Williams
PF: Kevin Garnett, Joe Smith, Corliss Williamson
SF: Ron Artest, Francisco Garcia
SG: Kevin Martin, Quincy Douby
PG: Mike Bibby, Ronnie Price

Nope - giving away picks with the condition this team is in is not the way to improve. Giving away too much future for the "now", IMHO.
 
There are these 2 guys... Duncan and Dirk. I think you've heard of them also...

Yes I have. Duncan might be better than KG in the same way that Bill Russel was better than Wilt Chamberlain, but statistically, Duncan only beats KG in blocks per game and FG%, and KG is better everywhere else. Dirk is a better shooter/scorer, but shooting and scoring does not a power-forward make. KG is a much better rebounder, defender, passer, etc...In fact, KG is averaging twice as many blocks and steals per game as Dirk.
 
Nope - giving away picks with the condition this team is in is not the way to improve. Giving away too much future for the "now", IMHO.

Agreed. Can't give away three first rounders for a guy who will be on his way down before we even give away all the picks. Not in the NBA.
 
I'd probably do both trades, the first just to dump KT and Brad for a rebounder, the second because I don't think reef can bring back the numbers he up in his glory days
 
Usually takes 2-3 stars bare minimum to win it all, how many other stars have been on his teams?

I'll name them.

Stephon Marbury, Tom Gugliotta, Terrell Brandon, Joe Smith, Latrell Sprewell, Sam Cassell, Wally Szczerbiak, Ricky Davis.

Not impressed with that list of Quasars? Neither am I.
 
Usually takes 2-3 stars bare minimum to win it all, how many other stars have been on his teams?


I'm sick of this argument. What about the converse? Who has KG made better? If he is so great why doesn't he elevate the games of those around him? He gets stats, wonderful. How many rings? Heck, how many playoff series victories?
 
I'm sick of this argument. What about the converse? Who has KG made better? If he is so great why doesn't he elevate the games of those around him? He gets stats, wonderful. How many rings? Heck, how many playoff series victories?

Been a number of guys who have never been better than when they were paired with KG -- Cassel, Googs, Rasho, Hudson, Hassel etc. etc. He's never had a guy who was even close to a #2 on an elite team. Spree might have been when he was young, but a) he wasn't young by the time he played wiht KG; and b) the Wolves WERE elite when he showed up there. And Marbury had the talent, but has obviously been a career loser.
 
Been a number of guys who have never been better than when they were paired with KG -- Cassel, Googs, Rasho, Hudson, Hassel etc. etc. He's never had a guy who was even close to a #2 on an elite team. Spree might have been when he was young, but a) he wasn't young by the time he played wiht KG; and b) the Wolves WERE elite when he showed up there. And Marbury had the talent, but has obviously been a career loser.

Googs was already a star when KG got there. Cassell was already a star, and basically maintained that in Minnesota. In fact, playing with a real post-oriented stud, Cassell won championships. Which brings up a good question: who was Olajuwon's elite #2? You're throwing out Rasho, Hudson, and Hassell to get me to say they are not star level and inadvertently proving your point. I see you working your lawyer voodoo. But my point is not that he hasn't won a championship. As others have stated, many greats never achieved that goal. My point is that he has not gotten out of the first round but once. He has certainly had the talent around him for that, if he is actually the leader and MVP that so many claim. The great leader allowed that same WCF team to collapse the next year. Moreover, an MVP in his prime has missed the playoffs for the past three years. That is inexcusable. I am not interested in another half-arsed attempt at contention that centers around three feckless leaders in KG, Artest, and Bibby. I'd much rather start a rebuild around high-character guys like Martin, Garcia, and a draft pick, possibly keeping Miller as a mentor.
 
Googs was already a star when KG got there.

Googs is, at best, a third option scorer for a decent team. He was a "star" in Minny when KG got there because the T-Wolves sucked that badly.

Perhaps that's merely conjecture on my part -- but he was merely above-average for the Bullets, was traded twice his third year in the league, and spent the last six years in the NBA as a roll player averaging less than 10 ppg.

The only two years he averaged more than 20 ppg, he did it playing along side KG.

Cassell was already a star, and basically maintained that in Minnesota. In fact, playing with a real post-oriented stud, Cassell won championships.

Cassell was little more than a talented journeyman before joining the T-Wolves (his sixth team), and to a degree still is. He established himself a little in Milwaukee, but never really made the Bucks relevent.

And he won 2 championships with a "real post-oriented stud" his first two seasons in the league as an offensive spark plug off the bench -- averaging less than 10 points both years.

Which brings up a good question: who was Olajuwon's elite #2?

For the second championship, Hall of Famer Clyde Drexler, who basically rescued the struggling defending champions when he was brought over in a mid-season trade.

But you're right, the first year Olajuwon did it mostly by himself ... and carried Otis Thorpe, Vernon Maxwell, Robert Horry, Sam Cassell, Kenny Smith and Mario Elie.

Or maybe depth can be considered an elite #2 as well.

But my point is not that he hasn't won a championship. As others have stated, many greats never achieved that goal. My point is that he has not gotten out of the first round but once. He has certainly had the talent around him for that,

A lot is made about the 7 straight first round losses. But the T-wolves were huge, huge underdogs in every single one of them.

KG's first year in the playoffs the T-Wolves lost to the Rockets with Olajuwon, Drexler and Barkley on the team.

His second year they lost to Gary Payton, Vin Baker (when he was still All-Star caliber) and Detlef Schrempf during the Sonics' third straight Pac Div Championship -- pushing them to the full 5 games.

His other opponents? Tim Duncan, David Robinson and the Spurs (twice) The Trailblazers during their run to the WCF. Dallas and the Big Three. And Kobe and Shaq's Lakers.

You may think he had the talent around him to upset at least one of those teams, but that just may be an unreconcilable disagreement between us, which is fine.

Moreover, an MVP in his prime has missed the playoffs for the past three years. That is inexcusable.

I don't think he's been an MVP candidate since 2004. And during those past three years no one could look at the T-wolves roster and say "yeah, they're going to the playoff".

Substitute KG with any one star in the league onto the T-wolves roster and tell me they would carry that team to the playoffs.

That's not sarcasm, I'm actually curious who we might come up with.

I am not interested in another half-arsed attempt at contention that centers around three feckless leaders in KG, Artest, and Bibby. I'd much rather start a rebuild around high-character guys like Martin, Garcia, and a draft pick, possibly keeping Miller as a mentor.

And on this, we are in complete and utter agreement -- on most of your points.

The last thing I want is another "win now" situation with a window that closes in two years -- when the draft won't be as rich and we will have missed out on next year's talented FA crop.

But I don't understand your characterization of Garnett. Is it because of the alleged assualt charges when he was in High School -- because I saw Behind the Glory too.

Or is it just his on-court, in your face, power game persona, mixed with futility in the playoffs that you assume he's a thug?

Most Minny fans seem to have great things to say about his character and community involvement as well as passion for the game. Maybe I'm just not privy to the same info as you.

The irony is, you don't want KG as a mentor, but you do want Miller. Why, cause he's a good ole boy?

The last thing I want is an overpriced, soft center who also has never won anything mentoring the next generation of our team.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top