Welcome Davion Mitchell

The shooting could be a real concern with Fox, Mitchell and Holmes on the court at the same time. I think Mitchell's 3pt% last year was a mirage. I'd bet he will wind up shooting around 30% from 3 this year.
The college 3 isn't the NBA 3, and the defenders DM faced at Baylor aren't the ones he'll face with Sacramento. It's pretty unlikely that he'll shoot 45% from 3 in his rookie year.

But what makes 63/141 on 3s (44.7%) a "mirage"? What makes your 30% expectation more reasonable than, say, 35%?

I'm genuinely curious.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
The college 3 isn't the NBA 3, and the defenders DM faced at Baylor aren't the ones he'll face with Sacramento. It's pretty unlikely that he'll shoot 45% from 3 in his rookie year.

But what makes 63/141 on 3s (44.7%) a "mirage"? What makes your 30% expectation more reasonable than, say, 35%?

I'm genuinely curious.
On the flip side, NBA spacing isn't as tight as it is in college hoops and he'll probably have many more seams to attack as long as teams don't just completely lay off his shot.
 
Last edited:

I don't remember Schmitz ever really pumping up a dude this much. Seems to really go to bat for Mitchell.
I totally enjoy Mike Schmitz player interviews and game breakdowns.
I watched a lot of them but not on Mitchell as I had no reason to think him our pick. I thought Mitchell could go before or after 9 but not to Sac.
Anyways, loved this interview, more respect for Mitchell now and in a cautious way for Monte too by going unconventional and picking who he believed BPA.
 
Count me among the crowd that wants the 3 guard lineup next year. I’m not drafting a guard ahead of potential starters at more valuable positions just to let him back up our best player.

Fox Wright
Hali Davis
Mitchell (traded player for Buddy)
Barnes Bagley
Holmes Queta

Trade Buddy and keep Bags since he had no value. Queta can start against the larger centers.

Just do it Tinker, this is what you wanted.
If playing a 3 guard lineup, I would suggest Mitchell at the 2 and Hali at the 3
since Hali is tall enough to play SF

Fox Wright Ramsey
Mitchell Davis James
Hali Buddy Woodard
Barnes Bagley Metu
Holmes Queta Jones

Buddy and Bagley can both play off the Bench until traded
 
Last edited:
The college 3 isn't the NBA 3, and the defenders DM faced at Baylor aren't the ones he'll face with Sacramento. It's pretty unlikely that he'll shoot 45% from 3 in his rookie year.

But what makes 63/141 on 3s (44.7%) a "mirage"? What makes your 30% expectation more reasonable than, say, 35%?

I'm genuinely curious.
His FT%. He shot under 70% from the line all 3 years in college. I don't know how many smaller guards have done that and have been good shooters in the NBA but I'd say the list is very short. Rondo is one player I can think of but it took him what, 10 years to become an average 3 point shooter?

If his FT% was 75 or 80% I'd say he's just a guy who took a couple years to dial his shot in but it's his efficiency at the line that makes me think he's going to be a poor shooter.

There are a lot of cases of guys having mirage type 3pt years in college. I believe Derrick Williams shot over 50% from 3 in college and that probably had a lot to do with him getting picked 1st.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
On the flip side, NBA spacing isn't as tight as it is in college hoops and he'll probably have many more seams to attack was long as teams don't just completely lay off his shot.
In the articles and interviews I’ve read on Davion, he’s been studying Donovan Mitchell and Lillard and CP, but he spent a lot of time mastering what Don Mitchell does with his feet and the shiftiness. The hesitation dribble is fairly lethal.

Former NBA player Don McLean is on record as saying he’s never had anyone as dedicated and driven as Donovan Mitchell as far as ability and desire and drive to succeed…….until Davion Mitchell came along. I don’t think what Davion did in his senior year is an aberration or mirage. I don’t know about 45% from 3 but I think he’s the whole package.

An area he will need to improve is his floater game as his % on those types of shots was not good.
 
Honestly, I think this works out well for us once we move Buddy.

Teams need a good 3 guard rotation, and it’s not like anybody else available where we picked screamed “all star starter”.

Everyone talking about us needing to trade Fox need to relax. And everyone swearing off the Kings should realize if you’re still here, you’re a lifer. The time to quit this franchise was like, 10 years ago!
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
In the articles and interviews I’ve read on Davion, he’s been studying Donovan Mitchell and Lillard and CP, but he spent a lot of time mastering what Don Mitchell does with his feet and the shiftiness. The hesitation dribble is fairly lethal.

Former NBA player Don McLean is on record as saying he’s never had anyone as dedicated and driven as Donovan Mitchell as far as ability and desire and drive to succeed…….until Davion Mitchell came along. I don’t think what Davion did in his senior year is an aberration or mirage. I don’t know about 45% from 3 but I think he’s the whole package.

An area he will need to improve is his floater game as his % on those types of shots was not good.
His shooting charts from last season are pretty much the platonic ideal for modern basketball: Nothing but threes and shots at the rim.

I don't know if he'll become a Donovan-level shooter (not that Donovan is particularly accurate from the perimeter himself) but any failure to shoot on Davion's part certainly wouldn't come from a lack of effort.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
I'm not even a HB fan, but this is just plain BS. "Most Kings fans despised"? What universe do you live in?
I don't know about most but there was a vocal portion of the Kings fanbase hating on the trade, with some advocating a trade for Andrew Wiggins (LOL until this last year) or Otto Porter (LOL) instead.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
The one where the acquisition was derided on the basis of his contract and the fact that he wasn't considered a "winning player."
Not sure how people could even be mad about that at the time considering Harrison was expiring AND the Kings literally gave up nothing (Z-Bo never played a game again and Justin Jackson is barely in the league but a champion) for him.
 
His FT%. He shot under 70% from the line all 3 years in college. I don't know how many smaller guards have done that and have been good shooters in the NBA but I'd say the list is very short. Rondo is one player I can think of but it took him what, 10 years to become an average 3 point shooter?

If his FT% was 75 or 80% I'd say he's just a guy who took a couple years to dial his shot in but it's his efficiency at the line that makes me think he's going to be a poor shooter.

There are a lot of cases of guys having mirage type 3pt years in college. I believe Derrick Williams shot over 50% from 3 in college and that probably had a lot to do with him getting picked 1st.
I see. If that's the only basis for your guess you are GREATLY overstating the predictive power of free throw percentage. And, yes, Derrick Williams shot almost 60% from 3 in his sophomore year at AZ - on 1.9 attempts/game, vs. 4.7/game for Mitchell.

W/few exceptions, NBA players shoot worse from 3 in their rookie seasons than they did in their final college seasons. But I'll be very surprised if DM drops to 30%. We'll see!
 
Not sure how people could even be mad about that at the time considering Harrison was expiring AND the Kings literally gave up nothing (Z-Bo never played a game again and Justin Jackson is barely in the league but a champion) for him.
Well, I'm thinking more about the fact that many were not a fan of the fact that we were going to have to pay him a bunch of money to keep him.
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
The one where the acquisition was derided on the basis of his contract and the fact that he wasn't considered a "winning player."
That wasn't a majority opinion to my recollection. No matter what the move, there will be a vocal minority, at the least, who will hate it. But it felt to me like a good majority were in big favor of the acquisition.
 
Maybe a 3 guard lineup could work if other team has a smaller SF

But As long as you trade Buddy, I still think long term Fox, Hali and Mitchell Would be a very successful 3 guard Rotation
Keep Wright or TD as insurance

Fox,Hali,Mitchell at 1 and 2
Barnes (Buddy for SF player)
Bagley,Metu
Holmes, Queta

That is a good 9 man rotation
Nobody really playing out of position
Just a Buddy Trade away from a balanced roster
 
Last edited:
Think everyone’s opinion will be of the positive kind once the Cali classic and summer league gets going. Yhall going to love him.

And I do think Mitchell makes a Philly trade much more viable. Monte likely knows that. Mitchell is exactly the type of PG for that Philly team.
He likely has the team to himself there though. The question is what happens when that isn't the case. I don't think anyone has or is doubting his potential and abilities.
 
I see. If that's the only basis for your guess you are GREATLY overstating the predictive power of free throw percentage. And, yes, Derrick Williams shot almost 60% from 3 in his sophomore year at AZ - on 1.9 attempts/game, vs. 4.7/game for Mitchell.

W/few exceptions, NBA players shoot worse from 3 in their rookie seasons than they did in their final college seasons. But I'll be very surprised if DM drops to 30%. We'll see!
I could be and I could definitely be swayed if anyone was able to provide me with examples of good 3 point shooting guards that shoot free throws as poorly as Mitchell. It's difficult to find NBA rotational guards that shoot that low at the line in general. Picking good 3 point shooters out of that short list is going to be a task.

I hope I'm wrong and he's a solid outside shooter but I just think the data so far says otherwise. I also won't solely judge him on his rookie year percentages but if he does shoot poorly his rookie year, that's just more data that backs up his lack of shooting over the one outlier statistic on his stat sheet.
 
It is crazy. The only people who seem to not like the pick are Kings fans.
Dude, almost everything I've seen is "Great pick" "but what are they doing?" "how does he fit" "oh well, don't worry about that he's a great player!"

Uh, Kings fans understand that need to worry better than anyone. It's happened time and time again. Just recently with Bogdan and Buddy. LOL.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
Dude, almost everything I've seen is "Great pick" "but what are they doing?" "how does he fit" "oh well, don't worry about that he's a great player!"

Uh, Kings fans understand that need to worry better than anyone. It's happened time and time again. Just recently with Bogdan and Buddy. LOL.
The logjam just got a little less jammed though. Once Buddy's gone, you've got 96 minutes to split between Fox, Hali, and Davion plus any extra minutes running a three guard lineup. If TD gets re-signed, he'll probably see some minutes at 3 like he was getting at the end of last season but the Wright move clears up a lot of that confusion if but temporarily.
 
Well, I'm thinking more about the fact that many were not a fan of the fact that we were going to have to pay him a bunch of money to keep him.
Being honest, I thought most of us liked the move and were more alarmed with how Joerger decided to use him.

Ultimately, I think we all now agree he works best as a 4, but it also seemed pretty dang clear that the move was made in a way that left a huge hole at the 3 spot, and was meant to move Bagley into the starting 5.

This is a large part of the reason if even if I think Joerger was a good coach (I waffle on this, tbh) he needed to go because he was basically insubordinate after the Bagley pick came in.
 
Putting aside the fact that you just assumed Walton would do something logical, what on earth are you talking about? Even the average SG will be bigger than him. The issue with Mitchell's size isn't that he can't guard PGs, it's that if we're running out a 3 guard lineup with Fox and Hali or if we're sticking him on the other teams best perimeter player (which others have said is the whole point) he's likely going to be guarding bigger players who have a height advantage that helps them shoot over him. Height advantage doesnt only matter for post ups, which is what YOU suggested.
He can most certainly guard bigger players with the ball. He's a little like Mugsy Bogues back in the day where he got so far under guys every dribble was up for grabs.

Walton is Walton, but from the way Monte phrased that comment about how he's already talked about guard lineups with Luke makes me think Luke is just being a good company man in some ways last year. That would make sense in how nobody, anywhere thought the Kings should hang onto Luke. Well, he takes direction from all those analytics genius's. Who apparently don't look at net rating as a part of their equation. Monte talked about basic production when prodded during that presser about analytics. Like? He does know the college game is totally different when it comes to shot blocking right? College has no 3 second rule Monte? The floor is tighter spacing wise? Right?
 
The logjam just got a little less jammed though. Once Buddy's gone, you've got 96 minutes to split between Fox, Hali, and Davion plus any extra minutes running a three guard lineup. If TD gets re-signed, he'll probably see some minutes at 3 like he was getting at the end of last season but the Wright move clears up a lot of that confusion if but temporarily.
And if it's true that they think Davion can guard 4 positions then him getting a chance will help those minutes tick up. Bottom line though, we've had this discussion every year Vlade went in and out of free agency like someone going into a grocery store looking to feed a family of 3 and coming out with enough groceries to feed a small village. "It'll be fine!" Bogdan and Buddy will be fine. Dedmon will be OK. Hill will get plenty of minutes. Yeah, no, pretty much worked out exactly as expected if the team is unwilling to go all in playing a player out of their natural position. 3 players, 2 positions. Someone is either a backup 24 mpg type, or they platoon everyone down so that that star production goes bye bye along with it's coinciding value. NBA front offices act like this is all rocket science and in turn over complicate this into infinity on their way to failure. And TD getting minutes at the 3 wasn't a good thing last year, it was a mismatch. The 4 guard lineup tricked Carlisle that one time though. Buddy was the one that didn't look terrible at the 3. In fact, the best net rating combo was Fox/Haliburton/Buddy/Barnes/Holmes. Extracting two of the key components of one of the only things that did work is sketchy.
 
Being honest, I thought most of us liked the move and were more alarmed with how Joerger decided to use him.

Ultimately, I think we all now agree he works best as a 4, but it also seemed pretty dang clear that the move was made in a way that left a huge hole at the 3 spot, and was meant to move Bagley into the starting 5.

This is a large part of the reason if even if I think Joerger was a good coach (I waffle on this, tbh) he needed to go because he was basically insubordinate after the Bagley pick came in.
not me, I have always felt Barnes scores better and can defend better against smaller 3's
 
In the modern NBA, these positions have largely become interchangeable so it doesn't really seem to matter as long as the other 3 or 4 is big or quick enough to cover the guy Barnes can't.
Right - I guess I should clarify that his position is whatever, but I think we all thought Fox-Buddy-Bogi would split time between two positions and Barnes, Bjelica, Bagley and WCS would be our front court, old basketball thinking. Had we known the way Joerger would play Barnes we could have kept Shump - who appeared to be moved out of consideration he was entering a contract year and would appear to have been frozen out of the lineup with Barnes arrival. Shump's departure definitely had a huge effect as the wheels fell off.