Livinthedream
All-Star
Seems as if this team is always trying to make players something they're not instead of just letting players play their natural positions while letting them do what they do best.
100%
Seems as if this team is always trying to make players something they're not instead of just letting players play their natural positions while letting them do what they do best.
The shooting could be a real concern with Fox, Mitchell and Holmes on the court at the same time. I think Mitchell's 3pt% last year was a mirage. I'd bet he will wind up shooting around 30% from 3 this year.
On the flip side, NBA spacing isn't as tight as it is in college hoops and he'll probably have many more seams to attack as long as teams don't just completely lay off his shot.The college 3 isn't the NBA 3, and the defenders DM faced at Baylor aren't the ones he'll face with Sacramento. It's pretty unlikely that he'll shoot 45% from 3 in his rookie year.
But what makes 63/141 on 3s (44.7%) a "mirage"? What makes your 30% expectation more reasonable than, say, 35%?
I'm genuinely curious.
I totally enjoy Mike Schmitz player interviews and game breakdowns.
I don't remember Schmitz ever really pumping up a dude this much. Seems to really go to bat for Mitchell.
Count me among the crowd that wants the 3 guard lineup next year. I’m not drafting a guard ahead of potential starters at more valuable positions just to let him back up our best player.
Fox Wright
Hali Davis
Mitchell (traded player for Buddy)
Barnes Bagley
Holmes Queta
Trade Buddy and keep Bags since he had no value. Queta can start against the larger centers.
Just do it Tinker, this is what you wanted.
The college 3 isn't the NBA 3, and the defenders DM faced at Baylor aren't the ones he'll face with Sacramento. It's pretty unlikely that he'll shoot 45% from 3 in his rookie year.
But what makes 63/141 on 3s (44.7%) a "mirage"? What makes your 30% expectation more reasonable than, say, 35%?
I'm genuinely curious.
In the articles and interviews I’ve read on Davion, he’s been studying Donovan Mitchell and Lillard and CP, but he spent a lot of time mastering what Don Mitchell does with his feet and the shiftiness. The hesitation dribble is fairly lethal.On the flip side, NBA spacing isn't as tight as it is in college hoops and he'll probably have many more seams to attack was long as teams don't just completely lay off his shot.
Honestly, I think this works out well for us once we move Buddy.
Teams need a good 3 guard rotation, and it’s not like anybody else available where we picked screamed “all star starter”.
Everyone talking about us needing to trade Fox need to relax. And everyone swearing off the Kings should realize if you’re still here, you’re a lifer. The time to quit this franchise was like, 10 years ago!
His shooting charts from last season are pretty much the platonic ideal for modern basketball: Nothing but threes and shots at the rim.In the articles and interviews I’ve read on Davion, he’s been studying Donovan Mitchell and Lillard and CP, but he spent a lot of time mastering what Don Mitchell does with his feet and the shiftiness. The hesitation dribble is fairly lethal.
Former NBA player Don McLean is on record as saying he’s never had anyone as dedicated and driven as Donovan Mitchell as far as ability and desire and drive to succeed…….until Davion Mitchell came along. I don’t think what Davion did in his senior year is an aberration or mirage. I don’t know about 45% from 3 but I think he’s the whole package.
An area he will need to improve is his floater game as his % on those types of shots was not good.
I'm not even a HB fan, but this is just plain BS. "Most Kings fans despised"? What universe do you live in?Most Kings fans despised the Harrison Barnes acquisition in 2019.
I don't know about most but there was a vocal portion of the Kings fanbase hating on the trade, with some advocating a trade for Andrew Wiggins (LOL until this last year) or Otto Porter (LOL) instead.I'm not even a HB fan, but this is just plain BS. "Most Kings fans despised"? What universe do you live in?
I'm not even a HB fan, but this is just plain BS. "Most Kings fans despised"? What universe do you live in?
Not sure how people could even be mad about that at the time considering Harrison was expiring AND the Kings literally gave up nothing (Z-Bo never played a game again and Justin Jackson is barely in the league but a champion) for him.The one where the acquisition was derided on the basis of his contract and the fact that he wasn't considered a "winning player."
His FT%. He shot under 70% from the line all 3 years in college. I don't know how many smaller guards have done that and have been good shooters in the NBA but I'd say the list is very short. Rondo is one player I can think of but it took him what, 10 years to become an average 3 point shooter?
If his FT% was 75 or 80% I'd say he's just a guy who took a couple years to dial his shot in but it's his efficiency at the line that makes me think he's going to be a poor shooter.
There are a lot of cases of guys having mirage type 3pt years in college. I believe Derrick Williams shot over 50% from 3 in college and that probably had a lot to do with him getting picked 1st.
Not sure how people could even be mad about that at the time considering Harrison was expiring AND the Kings literally gave up nothing (Z-Bo never played a game again and Justin Jackson is barely in the league but a champion) for him.
The one where the acquisition was derided on the basis of his contract and the fact that he wasn't considered a "winning player."
I'm not even a HB fan, but this is just plain BS. "Most Kings fans despised"? What universe do you live in?
Think everyone’s opinion will be of the positive kind once the Cali classic and summer league gets going. Yhall going to love him.
And I do think Mitchell makes a Philly trade much more viable. Monte likely knows that. Mitchell is exactly the type of PG for that Philly team.
I see. If that's the only basis for your guess you are GREATLY overstating the predictive power of free throw percentage. And, yes, Derrick Williams shot almost 60% from 3 in his sophomore year at AZ - on 1.9 attempts/game, vs. 4.7/game for Mitchell.
W/few exceptions, NBA players shoot worse from 3 in their rookie seasons than they did in their final college seasons. But I'll be very surprised if DM drops to 30%. We'll see!
It is crazy. The only people who seem to not like the pick are Kings fans.
Minimal upside?
Dude, almost everything I've seen is "Great pick" "but what are they doing?" "how does he fit" "oh well, don't worry about that he's a great player!"
Uh, Kings fans understand that need to worry better than anyone. It's happened time and time again. Just recently with Bogdan and Buddy. LOL.
Being honest, I thought most of us liked the move and were more alarmed with how Joerger decided to use him.Well, I'm thinking more about the fact that many were not a fan of the fact that we were going to have to pay him a bunch of money to keep him.
Putting aside the fact that you just assumed Walton would do something logical, what on earth are you talking about? Even the average SG will be bigger than him. The issue with Mitchell's size isn't that he can't guard PGs, it's that if we're running out a 3 guard lineup with Fox and Hali or if we're sticking him on the other teams best perimeter player (which others have said is the whole point) he's likely going to be guarding bigger players who have a height advantage that helps them shoot over him. Height advantage doesnt only matter for post ups, which is what YOU suggested.
The logjam just got a little less jammed though. Once Buddy's gone, you've got 96 minutes to split between Fox, Hali, and Davion plus any extra minutes running a three guard lineup. If TD gets re-signed, he'll probably see some minutes at 3 like he was getting at the end of last season but the Wright move clears up a lot of that confusion if but temporarily.
Being honest, I thought most of us liked the move and were more alarmed with how Joerger decided to use him.
Ultimately, I think we all now agree he works best as a 4, but it also seemed pretty dang clear that the move was made in a way that left a huge hole at the 3 spot, and was meant to move Bagley into the starting 5.
This is a large part of the reason if even if I think Joerger was a good coach (I waffle on this, tbh) he needed to go because he was basically insubordinate after the Bagley pick came in.
not me, I have always felt Barnes scores better and can defend better against smaller 3's
Right - I guess I should clarify that his position is whatever, but I think we all thought Fox-Buddy-Bogi would split time between two positions and Barnes, Bjelica, Bagley and WCS would be our front court, old basketball thinking. Had we known the way Joerger would play Barnes we could have kept Shump - who appeared to be moved out of consideration he was entering a contract year and would appear to have been frozen out of the lineup with Barnes arrival. Shump's departure definitely had a huge effect as the wheels fell off.In the modern NBA, these positions have largely become interchangeable so it doesn't really seem to matter as long as the other 3 or 4 is big or quick enough to cover the guy Barnes can't.