CaminoChaos
Bench
just announced by Grant Napier on 1140
BigWaxer said:If they no games are missed then it's okay. I think it will come down to the wire now.
Bibby_Is_Clutch said:Lockout or not I dont mind to much. Im going to miss the basketball but if the Kings can play awsome ball for the shortened season without injuries then that could do well for us in getting back on track.
VF21 said:If there's a lockout, there's no personnel transactions as PixelP mentioned, AND there's no practice, etc.
The Kings would be much more likely to end up playing abysmal ball if they haven't had the chance to reform themselves into something resembling a cohesive unit.
You do NOT want a lockout. It doesn't help ANYONE.
CaminoChaos said:http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2081405
doesn't look good.
Edited by VF21 to add story for ease of commenting:
NBA officials told to prepare for lockout
by Chad Ford, ESPN
Deputy commissioner Russ Granik told members of the NBA's competition committee Monday to prepare for a lockout, four league sources, including two NBA general managers, have told ESPN.com.
League spokesman Tim Frank was more circumspect when confirming Granik's remarks, saying Granik told the committee "to prepare in case of a lockout."
Sources, some at the NBA's pre-draft camp in Chicago, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, are not optimistic that the league and the players' union can reach agreement on a new collective-bargaining agreement before the current contract expires June 30.
The same sources say, however, that any work stoppage will not be a long one.
"There's going to be a lockout," an NBA executive told Ford. "I don't think there's any way we get a deal done any time soon. We're not seeing eye to eye right now. The truth is that players don't really believe a lockout will hurt them in the summer. It won't be until there's a threat of losing that first paycheck that they'll get serious about negotiating again."
While this could be no more than posturing by the NBA, sources on the players' side are quietly conceding the same thing.
"I think they'll lock us out," a source with the NBA Players' Association said. "I think David [Stern] has always wanted to lock us out. I think it's a mistake. They act like they don't have anything to lose, but I think they do. The summer league, free agency, NBA players' playing in the qualifying tournament for the World Championships. The bottom line is that the players want to play. They [the players] offered to extend the current deal until a new one could be put into place. They [the owners] want this, and there's nothing we can do to stop them."
A number of issues currently separate the sides. The biggest is the owners' insistence that guaranteed contracts be considerably shortened. Currently, players can sign for a maximum of six or seven years, depending upon whether the player is signing with a new team (six years) or his current team (seven years). The owners have been trying to get that rolled back to five years.
Three other issues have become sticking points for the players: 1) the owners' proposal to reduce the amount of annual raises in a contract; 2) a "super luxury tax" that would more harshly penalize teams that spend more than a certain predetermined threshold; and 3) the proposed minimum age requirement of 20 years old.
Despite the resignation that a lockout appears inevitable, sources also have expressed optimism that any work stoppage would not be protracted or actually threaten the 2005-06 season. "I think both sides will take the month of July off," a prominent agent said. "I think we'll head back to the table in August and have something hammered [out] by September. The NBA has no interest in losing revenue and fan support by canceling games. The players have no interest in losing their paychecks. The stakes just aren't high enough right now. But they will be in the fall."
C Diddy said:Why can't athletes and owners take a hint from the most successful and profitable sports league in the world, the NFL, and adopt their systems along the lines of the NFL's. This lockout stuff seems to threaten every sport except the NFL every 4 years. No one goes to baseball games anymore except for the largest of market teams and hockey isn't even in session. Get your act together and come to an agreement. Guaranteed contracts are bad for professional sports as a whole. Give a little bit up, go with the 4/5 guarateed contract proposal with the fatter salary cap and higher tax threshold and thank your lucky stars you won't hanging out with unemployed Hockey players in Canada come this fall.
Bibby_Is_Clutch said:without injuries
piksi said:very funny - that is a good one![]()
What are the realistic chances of that ?
quick dog said:Will someone please tell me why a group of less than 400 extremely wealthy professional athletes have a union and a collective-bargaining agreement?
This is the essence of absurdity.![]()
VF21 said:"Only during the summer" isn't any consolation, BBB. It's "only during the summer" that teams make trades, acquire free agents, etc. If there's a lockout during the summer, then that's a LOT LESS TIME for Petrie to work his magic...