Kingsfan23
All-Star
I may not have minded the trade but I hope dude does get a standing ovation, loyal and a good dude. I doubt Rudy gets a reaction
Have you heard or read Cousins' comments post trade? I think those paint a pretty clear picture and Cousins is the type of guy that just does NOT change his mind.
His attitude that so many are dissing is exactly what makes him a great player.
but his agent (Dan fegan) is one of the biggest slimeball agents in the NBA
That's not true. Collision and Rudy both celebrated his leaving.You're factually wrong, plenty of ex-teammates have came out in support of Cuz and said he was a great teammate. Don't let facts get in the way of you being whiny and emotional, though.
Anyone know if this forum is any closer to fixing the server issues?
I don't remember them celebrating his leaving, but I might have missed that. However, even if they did it doesn't make it untrue that ex-teammates have come out in support of Cousins. Maybe you missed those.That's not true. Collision and Rudy both celebrated his leaving.
Not saying you are ultimately wrong. You may end up being 100% correct. But those comments were in the heat of the moment and of course he was upset. Because he didn't want to leave. But actions speak louder than words. He's still heavily involved in the area. He likes Sac so much that once 18 months go by, it's entirely possible his feelings and stance changes. You never know. If he didn't love the area and fans so much, I'd give it zero chance. But he does. That said, I'd lay odds that he ends up in Washington with John Wall before anywhere else.
Anyone know if this forum is any closer to fixing the server issues?
Everything Cuz does is "heat of the moment." That's always been his problem!!
Not everyone agrees that it's a problem. Teams have won titles with players more vocal and more disruptive that Cuz. Draymond Green is a modern example. I'd rather have an emotional player that goes overboard from time to time than a player that never appears to care regardless what happens on the court. But that's just me.
As I've said numerous times, if the Kings hadn't blown nearly all of the draft picks they've had during Cousins tenure, we very likely wouldn't be having this discussion. In 2009, they had the worst record in the NBA -- before Cuz got there. Since adding Cuz in 2010, they never added much of anything else. When you're in the lottery every single year since 2006 and can't attract worthwhile FA, you can't afford to miss in the draft and the Kings not only did that, but took it to another level.
The Kings didn't win when Isaiah Thomas was on the roster either. Neither did Phoenix for the short time he was there. But when he magically joined a competent franchise, he suddenly becomes a key piece of a 53 win team. The one constant during the past 11 years has been the incompetence and instability of ownership and the front office. That above anything else is why this team has continued to lose. Perhaps that has started to change since the arrival of Vlade, Cantanella and Perry. But it's not because DeMarcus Cousins was here or because he's gone now. Or even because you didn't like his attitude. The losing and dysfunction started 4 seasons before his name was called on draft night 2010. The problem has always been much larger than 1 player. That's what most don't want to acknowledge.
If the Kings start winning next season or the season after that, it will be because they finally drafted correctly and managed to collect more than a few good players. And, most of all, because they started functioning like a legit NBA front office. If DeMarcus was suddenly added to the roster tomorrow, it wouldn't change any of that.
I didn't say they all disliked playing with them but many key starters did.I don't remember them celebrating his leaving, but I might have missed that. However, even if they did it doesn't make it untrue that ex-teammates have come out in support of Cousins. Maybe you missed those.
I didn't say they all disliked playing with them but many key starters did.
Not everyone agrees that it's a problem. Teams have won titles with players more vocal and more disruptive that Cuz. Draymond Green is a modern example. I'd rather have an emotional player that goes overboard from time to time than a player that never appears to care regardless what happens on the court. But that's just me.
As I've said numerous times, if the Kings hadn't blown nearly all of the draft picks they've had during Cousins tenure, we very likely wouldn't be having this discussion. In 2009, they had the worst record in the NBA -- before Cuz got there. Since adding Cuz in 2010, they never added much of anything else. When you're in the lottery every single year since 2006 and can't attract worthwhile FA, you can't afford to miss in the draft and the Kings not only did that, but took it to another level.
The Kings didn't win when Isaiah Thomas was on the roster either. Neither did Phoenix for the short time he was there. But when he magically joined a competent franchise, he suddenly becomes a key piece of a 53 win team. The one constant during the past 11 years has been the incompetence and instability of ownership and the front office. That above anything else is why this team has continued to lose. Perhaps that has started to change since the arrival of Vlade, Cantanella and Perry. But it's not because DeMarcus Cousins was here or because he's gone now. Or even because you didn't like his attitude. The losing and dysfunction started 4 seasons before his name was called on draft night 2010. The problem has always been much larger than 1 player. That's what most don't want to acknowledge.
If the Kings start winning next season or the season after that, it will be because they finally drafted correctly and managed to collect more than a few good players. And, most of all, because they started functioning like a legit NBA front office. If DeMarcus was suddenly added to the roster tomorrow, it wouldn't change any of that.
Informing Cousins might have been the courteous and respectful thing to do, but his agent (Dan fegan) is one of the biggest slimeball agents in the NBA who would have further diminished any return the Kings got.
That's not true. Collision and Rudy both celebrated his leaving.
Looking at all of these stars being traded for pennies on the dollar (Jimmy Butler, Chris Paul, PG???), should make the national media re-think how well Vlade did in the DMC trade.
He basically got 4 first round picks (2016 6th pick: Buddy Hield, 2017: pick 15 Justin Jackson and pick 20: Harry Giles, and as a indirect result of trading DMC mid year, we kept our own high #5 pick: De'Arron Fox. We also got a high 2nd round pick (Frank Mason) for DMC.
Vlade basically rebuilt this whole team in 1 years time! Now that's impressive!![]()
The Warriors DID win titles with Draymond Green. And his teammates have called him the "heart and soul" of the team. But (1) he wasn't also the best player to where the team fell apart if he went off the rails and (2) those other stars could often help manage him when he flared up.
For the Kings Cousins was THE guy.
Cuz never had beef with the city or the fans. Even when he was kicked out of town he said that he will continue to have camps in the area and that was when he was ripping into Vivek and Vlade. Dude is an open book. There is nothing hidden there, he says what he means and means what he says.Not saying you are ultimately wrong. You may end up being 100% correct. But those comments were in the heat of the moment and of course he was upset. Because he didn't want to leave. But actions speak louder than words. He's still heavily involved in the area. He likes Sac so much that once 18 months go by, it's entirely possible his feelings and stance changes. You never know. If he didn't love the area and fans so much, I'd give it zero chance. But he does. That said, I'd lay odds that he ends up in Washington with John Wall before anywhere else.
I fully agree with you here.
I made a similar post somewhere else. Kings had IT and Cousins on the team at the same time even when they let Tyreke walk to NO. That year Geoff Petrie left a chest full of scouting reports on the draftees and recommendation to draft Giannis at #7.And if they drafted appropriately, perhaps Cousins would have been in more of a Draymond Green like situation, no? That's the entire point.
It's odd how players are perceived differently when they play on deeper, better, more talented teams. Green is considered a leader despite all his antics and ill timed technical fouls. That's because 99% of the time his errors are masked by how good his team is. DMC didn't have that luxury here in Sacramento. And that wasn't his fault. It's all about circumstances.
Imagine for a moment if the Kings had drafted Steph Curry instead of Tyreke in 2009. That realistically could have happened. That team still would have wound up in the lottery and in position to draft Cousins the very next season had they done that. Then imagine if they had drafted Klay Thompson or Kawhi Leonard in 2011, which, again, was entirely possible. What type of conversation would we be having now?
The way things turned out, Steph Curry was once in a similar situation as Cuz. The Warriors weren't very good the season prior to drafting him and then weren't good in the first few seasons after. However, the difference is the Warriors hit the lottery on their subsequent draft picks. They missed in 2010 with Ekpe Udoh, but then hit it big with Klay in 2011 and Harrison Barnes and Draymond Green in 2012. There's your makeover. But had the Kings drafted Steph in 2009 then followed that up by striking out on every pick after (just as they did after drafting Cousins), are we talking about Steph today as a 2-time MVP and NBA champion? Nope. Not a chance.
Again, it's all about circumstances.
That's not true. Collision and Rudy both celebrated his leaving.
So many conflicting reports on Cousins and his teammates, it's hard to know what to think. After reading dozens of snippets about him and his teammates, I get the feeling that he was probably a very confusing person to be around. Seemed like at any moment he could be at your throat and then the next he has his arm around you laughing. Seemed like the kind of guy who probably was the first to call you out but didn't want to take any criticism in return. Willie's interviews post Cousins gave me the impression that he didn't like him. Collison and Cousins went at it on the court and on the bench a lot but he gave him support after he left. Demarcus has also been commenting positively on the young gun's social media pages as well. Not to mention how giddy he looked to see everyone when we played him after the trade. He seemed like the type you either loved or hated but it wouldn't surprise me at all if you had to walk on eggshells around him.
You sir are incorrect.Wrong. Collison was one of his biggest supporters. And Rudy was already out for the year. WTF would he be celebrating?
You sir are incorrect.
As far as the Cousins trade, I think it HAD to happen.
It was not DMC fault, but there was no way Vlade or any GM could had built a winner around DMC after extending him to $40 mil a year.
There was just not enough resources to put a winning team around DMC, especially after we gave him the $40 mil a year extension. We would had lost our 2017 lottery pick (De'Arron Fox) and we would had no salary cap space to add any good players. Plus, the young players like Skal, Papa G, and Malichi would never had seen the court enough to really develop, being that we would had filled the roster with mid-tier talent to try and make the playoffs.
Vlade did the right thing and blew up the team mid season. Just about the only thing he did wrong was criticize or kick Boogie on his way out. I think if Vlade took the high road on the questions, i.e. "I didn't see anyway we could had fielded a competitive team around DMC, if we gave him the super max extension, so I blew up the team and started the rebuild." would had been the better answer at the time.
That being said, I think right now the Kings are in a much better position to win and make a long run in the playoffs in the future, as opposed to us staying the course with DMC.
We would have been better w Malone for sure, but I think the need to eventually get rid of cuz would still exist.I agree. The Kings ultimately failed Cousins and all of us from 2011 through 2016. Had they drafted better, made solid FA acquisitions and stayed the course with Coach Malone, things could have turned out so much better. But once they effed all of that up, the roster and staff was in such bad shape with regard to talent and assets that winning with Cuz wasn't a realistic option anymore. He was their only real asset and they used to him to start over. I get it.
Trading Jimmy buckets for spare parts is only a part of the discussion becuase we set the precedent and did it first. Shipping out our superstar for marginal returns.
Happy where we are but we didnt get adequate return on our assets and investment and it was facially managed.
The teams with the assets and situations to really utilize Boogie did not want him. LA would not give up Ingram.......Ingram. Danny Ainge did not want Boogie. I loved to watch the Big Fella play but apparently his act had worn on many in the NBA. Because based on just his playing ability he should have been a hot commodity. This was not the case and Vlade got the best deal he could I believe.
The haul on Boogie is Fox, Hield, Jackson, Giles and Mason. 4 first round picks and a very early second. What were you expecting???
One general manager says he wakes up every day hoping one of his rivals trades for Cousins. Another says "No f---ing way" when asked whether he'd ever consider dealing for him.