Have you read up on any sporting news lately?I'd imagine the odd man out of Phoenix would be Josh Jackson and they retain Oubre. I'd love him on the Kings if Barnes wasn't get paid so much.
Have you read up on any sporting news lately?
why don't you fill me in?
I believe he’s referring to Josh Jackson’s recent meltdown.
https://www.si.com/nba/2019/05/13/josh-jackson-arrested-felony-charge-rolling-loud-festival-suns
I cannot envision Vlade trading for Jackson given his views on the importance of character.
Yeah, I agree with you. Now if they want to trade him for Mason and a 2nd rd pick, why not take a shot at him. But I'm not giving up anything of value for him.
No.Here's my general question to the board. Are the Kings stable enough, high character enough, mature enough to take a shot at a kid like Jackson?
My view has been that it's very important to have high character individuals on your team in the early stage of it's development. That's why I thought Cousins was a poor pick for an unstable, young team. But if you really feel like the core character has grown into strong stuff, at some point you can take a chance on a guy with somewhat of a bad reputation. Are we there yet? Should this team ever take a chance on a guy like Jackson?
Is Josh Jackson low character or did he have an incident one time?
Is Josh Jackson low character or did he have an incident one time?
Also the big question is how does Suns perceive Josh's trade value:
https://valleyofthesuns.com/2019/05/14/if-phoenix-suns-trade-josh-jackson-whats-his-value/
Even after these recent failures Jackson still has some trade value because of his high draft position and flashes on the court. The two best recent comparisons to look at to find Jackson’s trade value are Markelle Fultz and D’Angelo Russell.
Markelle had arguably performed worse than Jackson when on the court but had major concerns whether he would ever be healthy. Even under these conditions Fultz was still able to net Philadelphia a mid-first round pick from the Thunder, early second round pick from Cleveland and Jonathon Simmons.
In Los Angeles De’Angelo had a completely different set of off the court issues for the Lakers that admittedly are less serious than Jackson’s but still caused hesitation. Getting rid of Russell was able to relieve them of the terrible Timofey Mozgovcontract that still had 3 years remaining and still brought them back a late-first round pick along with Brook Lopez.
It would make sense for the return on Josh to be more in line with what Markelle fetched. The potential with Jackson is not quite what it is with Fultz especially since we have seen him play for two years, however Jackson’s contract is a bit more manageable for teams to acquire.
Based on this article even with Bad character Suns would want way more than Vlade should offer to get him
Or is he just stupid? The reports of what happened would indicate a severe lack of grey matter IMHO.
He and D'Angelo Russell should have a stupid contest.
They're only going to get 2nd rounder(s) back for him if they're totally set on moving him. He's been in the running for the worst NBA player in the league the last 2 seasons and has yet to show any sort of signs that he'll be a rotation player moving forward, much less a core piece they thought they were getting with the #4 pick.
In theory though, he still has that physical archetype of a wing that every NBA team is looking for. If you can get him for a 2nd or 2, i'd take that chance