Mad D
Starter
The Evans we don't have under contract?jay dubb said:Hey can we still trade Evans?
The Evans we don't have under contract?jay dubb said:Hey can we still trade Evans?
Francisco d'Anconia said:if he can upgrade further (only thing I can think of is to ship off Peja for a big and slide SAR to SF), then he gets an "A".
kingkung said:Peja for Rasheed Wallace!! Let's bring on ALL the Blazers!
kingkung said:Peja for Rasheed Wallace!! Let's bring on ALL the Blazers!
DocHolliday said:The press conference is happening..or already did. I think Darius still comes in first for Shareef...and Thomas maybe backs up Peja instead of Corliss coming in first?? I mean we knew we were going to get Shareef and Petrie was still very interested in signing Darius. Now that we have SHareef it opens a lot of avenues for us move wise. Seeing what other moves will come for the rest of the summer will be very interesting.
nbrans said:Where can I get my Shareef Abdur-Rahim jersey???
Bricklayer said:As an aside, I don't think the ACTIVE rosters are going up to 14, but I can't be sure about that. Think the new CBA may just ahve specified that while you could only carry 12 active players, you had to carry at least 14 contracts (which would be all the union would care about).
jay dubb said:Hey can we still trade Evans?
PFFFT!! said:Then if its 14 players and we have 12 signed, we have 2 open slots. I would resign Darius and see about a trade involving either Darius and KT for a solid backup PF with expiring contract that would be our 6th man. Right now I don't see that six man that BJ was. That position would be awsome for a Center/PF.
G_M said:Based on what was apparently out there I think this was a good move.
May be the best "offensive" starting unit in the Western Conference.
PFFFT!! said:We have 12 players with SAR under contract. I believe we can have 13? So figure a S&T with Darius and or someone else. If we sign Darius it will either be him or KT as backup. I would probably take KT, but considering his contract is too hefty I would unload him for a couple of expiring contracts, probably two long tall dudes with dirty work on their minds.
BigWaxer said:35+ min since it was official and no word on any website (cept the Bee) / Espn news nothing. Its all about TO news right now.
The Nets sure got a lot of coverage even before they botched up the trade.
BigWaxer said:35+ min since it was official and no word on any website (cept the Bee) / Espn news nothing. Its all about TO news right now.
The Nets sure got a lot of coverage even before they botched up the trade.
Jkbiker said:PF SAR / THOMAS
SF PEJA / CORLISS
C MILLER / SKINNER / SAMPSON
SG WELLS / MARTIN / GARCIA
PG BIBBY / HART / PRICE
Dont these add up to 13 ? If Maloof is talking about another role player
Then that would be 14
If the league wants an average of 14 on the Roster then it would seem one more role player for number 14 would be in order
Since we have 3 at each guard position
it would seem one more PF or SF would be the last contract
I suppose Samson and Price might be non guarenteed and
will have to earn a spot in camp and could be replaced by an invitee
But a "role player" would indicate someone in the top ten
that would actually play minutes in a "Role"
Of course since our biggest need is Defense
So the last signing would be either a PF or Ctr that can really rebound
and or block shots
The bench front line could be KT/Skinner/Role player
But hmmm doubt KT or skinner would play SF
So does that mean we get a defensive minded SF?
Im so confused![]()
Jkbiker said:PF SAR / THOMAS
SF PEJA / CORLISS
C MILLER / SKINNER / SAMPSON
SG WELLS / MARTIN / GARCIA
PG BIBBY / HART / PRICE
Dont these add up to 13 ? If Maloof is talking about another role player
Then that would be 14
If the league wants an average of 14 on the Roster then it would seem one more role player for number 14 would be in order
Since we have 3 at each guard position
it would seem one more PF or SF would be the last contract
I suppose Samson and Price might be non guarenteed and
will have to earn a spot in camp and could be replaced by an invitee
But a "role player" would indicate someone in the top ten
that would actually play minutes in a "Role"
Of course since our biggest need is Defense
So the last signing would be either a PF or Ctr that can really rebound
and or block shots
The bench front line could be KT/Skinner/Role player
But hmmm doubt KT or skinner would play SF
So does that mean we get a defensive minded SF?
Im so confused![]()
Bibby-4-Three said:Maybe Christie? haha...wishful thinking!
Padrino said:its only wishful thinking to some. besides, DC has orally agreed to a contract with the mavs.