Ooh, I thought 'Jim Thomas' was a vulgarity no longer allowed to be spoken in our beloved city...even in remembering the 'good ole days'. Oh wait, or was that 'Dick Motta'....or 'Bill Russell'...ehh screw em' all!*L* Welcome to Sacramento Mr. Rahim!(Oh, and next time you want to know a good place to get some breakfast in Sac, I wont send you to the Back Door Lounge in Old Sac, again*L*)BonziFan said:Lets not forget the upgrade in ownership from Jim Thomas. We had nothing until they came and opened up their wallets. Now that they have been here for awhile it is like they are outdated. It seems that nothing is ever good enough.
Oh, and I think that in getting SAR, it is allowing Thomas to come off the bench at SF and Skinner off the bench at PF, rather than both at PF. I think probably solidifies our line-up a bit more than most people think...and remember, not to compare us to anybody or anything...but a TEAM in a midwestern city won an NBA title a year ago with a couple of ALMOST superstars and a bunch of pieces on the bench. So dont discount anything...we are alot deeper than most teams in the NBA by getting SAR...and whats upcoming in the way of a trade, probably involving Corliss and a draft pick or something like that, whoever we get with that will make us even more deep, and pretty damn good if you ask me.Padrino said:i'd like to comment quickly on the possible SAR acquisition, as well as the "something bigger" that people seem to think SAR can be packaged and traded for. its not gonna happen. here's why: instead of 3 mediocre tweeners at the big man positions, we now (quite possibly) have 4. at least he wouldnt cost us much. he's definitely a moveable piece at his price, but its unlikely that we'd be able to include him in a deal that would also include one of our other high-priced tweeners. that said, the kings are just dancing in tweener heaven right now. jamal sampson is a nice addition at backup C, but we're logjammed at the PF, and none of the four PF's (rahim, thomas, skinner, williamson) we have are all that great. SAR is the best of the four, but considering what they are costing us all together, thats not saying much.
nbrans said:I mean.... no, SAR is not as good as Chris Webber, and it's not going to turn the franchise around like Webber did. But Shareef Abdur-Rahim would be the biggest free agency acquisition since Divac. And what's most important about acquiring a player like him through free agency is that it's creating value. For the last several years we've just been turning over our existing talent into different talent. We haven't really added to the equation, except through shrewd moves. SAR adds completely because we wouldn't have to give up anything to get him. It would be the first major influx of talent without a trade since Webber, Divac and Williams.
So, I'd say that signing SAR would be up there with the Webber trade, but of course it's hyperbole to suggest that they're equal.
Gary said:If you lived through the 13 years of "rebuilding" than that is the last thing you want again. I know its a different owner/GM/coaching staff, but I would not be able to stand another lottery year where going into the season you know that you will be that lottery team.
Miller/Bibby/Peja alone in the starting lineup is a playoff team. Wells and SAR are not bad additions. I am not sure which defensive minded player you were wanting, but face the facts. Chandler, Garnett, and the others named on this board are UNAVAILABLE. You guys want to offload players that other teams don't want? SAR is an upgrade from KT. I see people wanting KWAME BROWN to play PF. WTF? KWAME BROWN is better than SAR how?
Agree with most of that, with the exception of shopping Miller...that would be stupid in every way you could serve it up. Miller/Bibby/Peja shouldnt be broken up for any reason...its not every day you have a proven core that, even though they have no titles, is proven to be the big part fo 50 wins a year in route to hopefully getting a ring. They get us to that level, and with everyone else being brought in, anything can happen.Venom said:I don't think they were that bad, and the Kings eventually immerged from them. Teams go in talent cycles. The Bulls were HORRIBLE, then they got MJ and progressed for a while, reeled off 6 titles in 8 years, were HORRIBLE again for almost a decade, and now have one of the best young teams around. This Kings team is being artificially kept at a playoff level with these sideways moves. I'd rather someone pulled the plug and let this era die a natural death. It was a great run, I loved it, but Webber's injury ended it and its time to find the next Kings superstar to pin our hopes on. There is nothing more excruciating than watching an owner/GM try to maintain past greatness inking exceedingly worse deals.
And I want to move our "core", not our undesirables. Of course we have to give a little in order to get something back. But I say we should be looking to move some of these guys before they become untradeable, like Peja will be after his max deal. That will not end well. I would also be shopping Miller. Bibby I would try to hold onto because of age.
SoupIsGood said:So, are you guys getting SAR, then?
Bibby/Wells/Peja/SAR/Miller
Pretty solid, you guys are a contender if you can get that bunch to play defense well.
Amen brother! Depth people...Depth!SacTownKid said:You know its funny how Kings fans totally rip Shareef apart. You should see how the Nets fans are taking the whole situation. They act like they just lost the second coming of Air Jordan.
I for one think it would be a good signing. If he comes, and he is cheap that is. Now we have 2 low post capable players!!! We never had any of those before!! We have a deep a#@ bench, I think we look pretty good if we land Reef.
WTF?!?!?! Miller is worthless as trade bait?? He's an All Star Freaking Center!!! I tend to agree with alot of what you have to say most of the time, but that kinda crossed the line a bit.funkykingston said:C Miller, Sampson
PF Rahim, Thomas, Skinner
SF Stojakovic, Williamson
SG Wells, Martin, Garcia
PG Bibby, Hart, Price
That's only thirteen players (unless I forgot someone), and it is also assuming that Price and Sampson make the team.
I only listed players once, and at their primary position, so this isn't exactly a depth chart. In fact, I think we'll see VERY little of Corliss this season, barring injury. I think you'll basically see Thomas and Skinner eat up nearly all of the backup minutes at the frontcourt positions with KT sliding between the 3 & 4 and Skinner sliding between the 4 & 5.
I'm still holding out hope for a big trade (most likely Peja as I don't want to see Bibby go and Miller is basically worthless as trade bait right now) but even without a deal, I feel better about this starting lineup than I did about the one that finished the season.
Glaring weaknesses have been neglected, which means that Petrie has fallen woefully short of turning this team into a contender, but I'll still take improvement (no matter how slight) over decline.
WTF?!?!?! Miller is worthless as trade bait?? He's an All Star Freaking Center!!! I tend to agree with alot of what you have to say most of the time, but that kinda crossed the line a bit.
Circa_1985_Fan said:Amen brother! Depth people...Depth!
Padrino said:a lot of you are missing the point here, i think. SAR is a solid player. at his price, he's a great acquisition...but this offseason was supposed to be about addressing the kings NEEDS!!! the kings do not need another offensively oriented tweener. we need size and defense, and considering 4 of the 5 starting spots are locked, all that leaves is the PF spot. if the kings organization is promoting "defense," and are serious about it, then i dont see the point of acquiring another undersized, defensively shy big man. maybe i'm way off base here...wait, no i'm not.![]()
Nice...glad you clarified that bit. I will say one thing, Brad's injury required no surgery, and didnt damage any ligaments or cartilage, it was just a bone break, so that shouldnt be effecting him at all right now...he more than likely is totally healed, and most other people in the league probably see it the same, too. Jordan even had a bone break early in his career, and look how much it effected him.*L*(not comparing him to MJ, but just saying it to explain the possible future effects of that injury.)funkykingston said:I suppose I should have taken more time and explained my point a little better. Miller is worthless as trade bait IMO because the Kings could not hope to get back equal or better value right now. Miller is 29, coming off an injury plagued season, has a huge contract and (in large part because of those injuries) looked awful in the playoffs.
I simply can't see a situation where the Kings could deal Miller for a better player or a young kid with a load of potential, at least not right now.
Just to clarify, I like Brad a lot. I just hope we see some real fight in him on the defensive end this upcoming season.
Well, I think had Keon Clark not been in Adelman's doghouse, he would have proven to be a decent fill in, maybe not scoring wise, but he would have been better than playing Jim Jackson and Hedo, or an injured Pollard out of position to fill that void.Pacboy said:Depth mean squats in the playoff and we proved that years ago when webb went down.
D-Mass said:But, again, that made the Mavs 1/5 tough...exactly what we are right now.
There never was any fueds.Evenstar said:ahhh
reef.... well if thats the big news, well he and bibby have better gotten over their fueds.
i'm still holding out for sometime bigger to happen![]()
![]()
The only way the Kings will ever get KG is when he is past his prime and looking for a title still...Minnesota isnt going to give KG up for anything less than Tim Duncan, and they certainly arent going to lose him to free agency. So lets just kill that little thought right now.SacTownKid said:Now, we can at least put together a nice little package for KG at the deadline. At least.
So don't lose faith in your Sacramento KG's...er...I mean Kings of the future VF! :\
Circa_1985_Fan said:The only way the Kings will ever get KG is when he is past his prime and looking for a title still...Minnesota isnt going to give KG up for anything less than Tim Duncan, and they certainly arent going to lose him to free agency. So lets just kill that little thought right now.