Sacramento Kings begin search for GM (merged)

I do like the fact that Vivek is sounding out Jerry West about this. That can only be a good thing!
For me that was the important takeaway from the article. If Vivek is getting advice from West good things are likely to happen, and not necessarily easily predicted things.West literally knows everyone in the game and has put together a couple of top organizations (with different people).
 
Not sold on Chris Wallace. People have given him credit now for the Gasol Swap, since it was widely panned at the time, but I am not convinced that even he thought Marc Gasol would end up being as good as he is. In fact, he turned around the next year and drafted Hasheem Thabeet, who was far from a sure thing, over James Harden.

He also traded Kevin Love for OJ Mayo.
All this!
 
Not to totally change the subject, but isn't it interesting that our beat writer, Jones, got his information from our prior beat writer Amick. Says more about Jones than it does Amick. Whats humorous is that Jones doesn't even credit Amick for the info. Instead he credits USA Today. Just saying!
 
FWIW peter vecey just tweeted that mike malone is a lock to be the next kings coach.


Peter Vecsey @PeterVecsey1 about 17 minutes ago
Mike Malone is a living lock 2B Kings' head coach, I'm informed. Don't know time frame of announcement, but go to sleep on it happening.


Peter Vecsey @PeterVecsey1 about 14 minutes ago
Warriors' CEO Joe Lacob told me last year he'd do everything 2 help Malone. So when team part owner bought into Kings, Mike became easy sell
 
Hmm, he's mentioning the right names. Learned from Jeff Van Gundy, coached under Mike Brown. Mike Brown was rightly ridiculed for his lack of offensive sets, but his Cavs teams did play defense pretty consistently. I like what he says about making defense the priority from day one as well, focusing on team defense over individual defense, and communicating with your teammates. Don't know much about him, but he's already on my good side. Seems like a no-nonsense New Yorker who'll keep everybody accountable and demand respect the right way.
 
Well, I'm impressed! I realize that talk is cheap, but he certainly says all the right things. If he's true to his word, and I have no reason to doubt him, he'll bring an entirely different culture to the Kings. Defense first and foremost. I like when he said, that if you don't play defense, then you can go play somewhere else. Anyway, based on those videos, I can see why people are impressed with him.
 
Well, I'm impressed! I realize that talk is cheap, but he certainly says all the right things. If he's true to his word, and I have no reason to doubt him, he'll bring an entirely different culture to the Kings. Defense first and foremost. I like when he said, that if you don't play defense, then you can go play somewhere else. Anyway, based on those videos, I can see why people are impressed with him.

No power point?
 
Hmm, he's mentioning the right names. Learned from Jeff Van Gundy, coached under Mike Brown. Mike Brown was rightly ridiculed for his lack of offensive sets, but his Cavs teams did play defense pretty consistently. I like what he says about making defense the priority from day one as well, focusing on team defense over individual defense, and communicating with your teammates. Don't know much about him, but he's already on my good side. Seems like a no-nonsense New Yorker who'll keep everybody accountable and demand respect the right way.

Should have all the connections -- dad was/is a longtime NBA guy too, and orchestrated the Bad Boys defense under Chuck Daly. **** head coach though.
 
Poached this from STR, interesting piece on Malone.

- Michael Malone gave us a telling glimpse into his personality, even before his first face-to-face meeting with the Bay Area media.
During a phone interview with the Warriors’ new lead assistant coach this month, a crying child acted as background noise. After about five minutes, it had to be asked which of his young daughters was having the temper tantrum.

“Come on, that’s not one of my kids. I wouldn’t allow it,” Malone said. “They would be running suicides right now, and they know it.”

Malone, along with new head coach Mark Jackson, plans to bring that kind of discipline to the Warriors this season in an attempt to change decades of lackadaisical defense, backbiting and losing.

“We’re not just going to talk about defense. We’re going to live it,” Malone said. “I don’t think defense has been taught there, because of the way they played – trying to outscore opponents. We’re going to teach it, and, as we teach it, we’re going to hold guys accountable.”

The Warriors are hoping Malone’s resume will prove to speak louder than the past handful of coaches who have come here talking defense yet walking offense. He’s taking a flat-out leap of faith that the franchise is finally serious about making the switch in philosophy.

Malone, 39, is married (Jocelyn) with two daughters (Caitlyn, 6, and Bridget, 5). He has 10 seasons of experience in the NBA after seven years in the college ranks – following in the footsteps of his father, Brendan, who coached in the league for 23 seasons.

The Cleveland Cavaliers won 66.3 percent of their games while Malone acted as Mike Brown’s top assistant from 2005 to 2009. The Cavs went to the playoffs all five seasons, including the 2008-09 season, during which they won 66 games and allowed an NBA-low 91.4 points a game.

Malone is widely considered as the mentor who got through to LeBron James and made him understand the importance of defense. What the coach did in his first season as Monty Williams’ lead assistant in New Orleans, however, may be as impressive. The Hornets allowed 94 points a game last season, trimming opponents’ scoring by 8.7 points a game and leapfrogging 17 teams in the defensive rankings from the previous year.

“We took a team that wasn’t given any chance, but we maximized what we had,” Malone said. “I’m more proud of that than all the games we won and everything we did in Cleveland. We changed the culture in one year.”

Malone certainly had an impact on New Orleans’ progress, but he also was working with one of the league’s best defensive point guards in Chris Paul, an inside presence in Emeka Okafor and a handful of defensive-minded wing players.

Without major roster changes in Oakland, Malone will be working with two guards who haven’t consistently proved willing or able to stop dribble penetration, a center who hasn’t shown up for the past two seasons and little depth.

“Can you play defense with two small guards? It’s a very interesting question, and I don’t have a definite answer,” Malone said. “Can they defend? Are they willing to defend? It could be hard to break those habits, but, if they want to win, they’ll be willing.”

Malone doesn’t believe that there’s a certain roster formula that equates to success. He’s defended and won with small teams, big teams, slow teams and fast teams. The common denominator in all of his successes has been an efficient offense that makes opponents work for every shot on the other end of the court.

All of that becomes quite a bit easier with an eraser or two on the backline.
That’s why Malone is excited about Ekpe Udoh, why he can’t wait for Andris Biedrins to return to form and why he hopes David Lee’s competitiveness can translate to better defense.

Malone wouldn’t be here if he didn’t think it has a chance of working. He had an offer to go to the Lakers and reunite with Brown. He was a finalist for the Warriors’ head-coaching gig and probably could have gotten into the running in Detroit, Minnesota or Toronto.

“It is very apparent that this group of guys is committed, passionate and enthusiastic about building something special. I had some great opportunities, but I saw that the Golden State Warriors were beginning a new journey,” Malone said. "This is an opportunity to build something special, to change a culture, to change a team’s identity and hopefully to change their fortunes.

“My girls have no idea what California is all about, but I have convinced them to be excited about seeing the Golden Gate Bridge, the redwood trees and the ocean. They’re as sold as I am, and that makes my life a whole lot easier.”

Especially since there won’t be any tears.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/sports/articl...ne-preaches-defense-2366556.php#ixzz2Uc5AkCcB
 
Last edited:
Well, I'm impressed! I realize that talk is cheap, but he certainly says all the right things. If he's true to his word, and I have no reason to doubt him, he'll bring an entirely different culture to the Kings. Defense first and foremost. I like when he said, that if you don't play defense, then you can go play somewhere else. Anyway, based on those videos, I can see why people are impressed with him.

Yes he says the right things. And yes, he seems to have great rapport with players he's worked with which is also a good sign. But of course, Keith Smart says a lot of good things (of course he then later in the same interview contradicts those same things but I digress) and assistants are often very popular among players.

What stands out to me with Malone is (1) his pedigree and who he's worked with and (2) the change in team defense in New Orleans and Golden State.

I've said from the very beginning that he was at the top of my list. Jerry Sloan would walk in the door with more respect and I really like the idea of him coaching the Kings, but every indication is that Ranadive wants to build a lasting organization similar to what the Spurs have done which requires a coach and GM that will both remain in place for a long time AND work hand in hand together. Malone and Schlenk seems like the team we may well end up with. And I have no issues with that.
 
“You want to see how they react on bench, how they interact with teammates, coaches,” Schlenk said. “You get maybe a little truer sense of what kind of person they are. I like the idea of building a team. I like the process of trying to mesh personalities and find the right pieces to the puzzle.”

“Every guy we draft or bring in, we give a personality test,” Schlenk said. “When a team gets along and there’s camaraderie, you see it on the floor.”

I wonder if this was considered by Petrie & Co?
 
“You want to see how they react on bench, how they interact with teammates, coaches,” Schlenk said. “You get maybe a little truer sense of what kind of person they are. I like the idea of building a team. I like the process of trying to mesh personalities and find the right pieces to the puzzle.”

“Every guy we draft or bring in, we give a personality test,” Schlenk said. “When a team gets along and there’s camaraderie, you see it on the floor.”

I wonder if this was considered by Petrie & Co?

You perhaps forget some of the teams he built?

If anything we traditionally seemed to try too hard to be nice.
 
Yes he says the right things. And yes, he seems to have great rapport with players he's worked with which is also a good sign. But of course, Keith Smart says a lot of good things (of course he then later in the same interview contradicts those same things but I digress) and assistants are often very popular among players.

What stands out to me with Malone is (1) his pedigree and who he's worked with and (2) the change in team defense in New Orleans and Golden State.

I've said from the very beginning that he was at the top of my list. Jerry Sloan would walk in the door with more respect and I really like the idea of him coaching the Kings, but every indication is that Ranadive wants to build a lasting organization similar to what the Spurs have done which requires a coach and GM that will both remain in place for a long time AND work hand in hand together. Malone and Schlenk seems like the team we may well end up with. And I have no issues with that.

I think there's no greater example of an assistant coach being loved by the players, and being a total failure as a head coach than Gary St. Jean. One of the nicest guys I ever met, but is a walkig example of the Peter Principle in action. However, its not fair to Malone to paint him into the same picture as Smart, or St Jean. One would hope that the only thing they have in common, was that all three were at one time assistant coaches for the Warriors.

I knew nothing about either Malone or Schlenk until a few days ago, so like most everyone else here, I'll have to trust in Ranadive's judgement on this one. I'm certainly ready to sweep the dust out of the corners and start over.
 
Yeah, I'm down with Malone and Schlenk based on the limited information we've seen. If you're going to hire a first-time head coach, Malone's story fits what you'd be looking for. Obviously there are some people that just don't do well as the leader of the team, but I'm fine with taking that gamble if that's the direction Ranadivé and company want to go.
 
FWIW peter vecey just tweeted that mike malone is a lock to be the next kings coach.


Peter Vecsey @PeterVecsey1 about 17 minutes ago
Mike Malone is a living lock 2B Kings' head coach, I'm informed. Don't know time frame of announcement, but go to sleep on it happening.


Peter Vecsey @PeterVecsey1 about 14 minutes ago
Warriors' CEO Joe Lacob told me last year he'd do everything 2 help Malone. So when team part owner bought into Kings, Mike became easy sell

Well, i remember Peter breaking the Artest - Peja trade before anyone else, so...
 
Yes he says the right things. And yes, he seems to have great rapport with players he's worked with which is also a good sign. But of course, Keith Smart says a lot of good things (of course he then later in the same interview contradicts those same things but I digress) and assistants are often very popular among players.

What stands out to me with Malone is (1) his pedigree and who he's worked with and (2) the change in team defense in New Orleans and Golden State.

I've said from the very beginning that he was at the top of my list. Jerry Sloan would walk in the door with more respect and I really like the idea of him coaching the Kings, but every indication is that Ranadive wants to build a lasting organization similar to what the Spurs have done which requires a coach and GM that will both remain in place for a long time AND work hand in hand together. Malone and Schlenk seems like the team we may well end up with. And I have no issues with that.
Malone also mentioned guys (like smart) that talk out of both sides of their mouth, preaching defense one second, and then having guys in the game that are allergic to it, playing major minutes.
 
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Great saying and all, but it doesn't really apply here. Peter wasn't just guessing or throwing things against the wall. None of us knew about the trade before he broke the story. We all deemed it to be a possibility, but i remember him coming out of nowhere with "The deal is exceedingly close".
 
So GS helping us out again? Damn, I am going to have to root for them when they aren't playing the Kings.
 
He seems like a no nonsense guy which is what this team needs, yeah assistants crash and burn often but so do re-treads, and the end of the day its about getting quality players, and i feel that ranadive and he group will do whatever it takes to win, as smart as ranadive is the one thing he says that sticks out to me the most is that he "always surrounds himself with people smarter than him" meaning he will instill trust and let people do their jobs and not meddle, even though 99% percent of the time he is the smartest person in the group.
 
He seems like a no nonsense guy which is what this team needs, yeah assistants crash and burn often but so do re-treads, and the end of the day its about getting quality players, and i feel that ranadive and he group will do whatever it takes to win, as smart as ranadive is the one thing he says that sticks out to me the most is that he "always surrounds himself with people smarter than him" meaning he will instill trust and let people do their jobs and not meddle, even though 99% percent of the time he is the smartest person in the group.

Good post.
 
I really don't see how RC Buford is an option. Is he really going to be willing to step down as the president of a Spurs team and come to Sac...hmmm I don't know. As far as Chris Wallace, epic fail....some of the trades and draft picks he has made is suspect to say the least. Why no mention of possibly Kevin Pritchard?
 
I really don't see how RC Buford is an option. Is he really going to be willing to step down as the president of a Spurs team and come to Sac...hmmm I don't know. As far as Chris Wallace, epic fail....some of the trades and draft picks he has made is suspect to say the least. Why no mention of possibly Kevin Pritchard?

Pop is the president and coach. Buford is the GM. There is no stepping down as president here in terms of Spurs basketball. To give you some perspective, Petrie is the President and Wayne Cooper is the GM for the Kings.

You may be confusing his title of President of Sports Franchises. He is president over their NBDL, WNBA, and AHL teams. For NBA basketball though, he is the GM.

Again, the only possibility of Buford coming here is that he wants a new challenge and/or he would like some more power to make basketball decisions without a Popovich to approve. I am assuming if he were to come on, he would take over Petrie's position, which is technically a promotion.
 
I don't think Buford will leave the Spurs so that is as realistic as bringing Phil Jackson in as the coach of the Sacramento Kings!

Wallace is probably overrated. I think Schlenk will probably be the one we end up with.

I do like the fact that Vivek is sounding out Jerry West about this. That can only be a good thing!

I don't know maybe if they give him a raise; like say double his salary he could leave
 
I really don't see how RC Buford is an option. Is he really going to be willing to step down as the president of a Spurs team and come to Sac...hmmm I don't know. As far as Chris Wallace, epic fail....some of the trades and draft picks he has made is suspect to say the least. Why no mention of possibly Kevin Pritchard?

Pritchard took over the general manager position in Indiana just one year ago. the guy he replaced, David Morway, seems to be another option, though.
 
You perhaps forget some of the teams he built?

If anything we traditionally seemed to try too hard to be nice.

I don't think niceness is related to evaluating the individual personalities of players and how those personalities will fit into the team. It is more of a question of values - what do you weigh more heavily in your personnel decision making process?

I do remember the entire body of work, not just the halcyon days of eons ago.
 
Back
Top