Sac/por

ImAKing

Bench
SAR [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]$5,400,000-[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] $5,800,000-[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] $6,200,000-[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] $6,600,000[/FONT]
6'9" 245lbs 30yrs old

for

Pryzbilla [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]$5,215,000- [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]$5,762,575- [/FONT]$6,310,150- [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]$6,857,725- [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]$7,405,300[/FONT](PO)
7'1" 243lbs 26yrs old

Pryz is only getting 16 mins a game this year. His contract is about the same as SAR but 1 yr longer. At this point SAR could be more useful for them than Pryz. He can add vet leadership and could be a mentor for Aldridge. I think Portland have nothing to lose.

Sac desperately need inside defense and a shotblocker. Pryz can do that and rebound. His only downsize is offense. Maybe KT could improve his play now that SAR is gone and hes the main PF. Most important of all, we dont have to play Corliss at center anymore.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but Pryzbilla is NOT worth that kind of money which he showed the minute the ink on his contract was dry.

I cannot think of a reason why the Kings would do this. If I recall the only really good games Przybilla had were against us...
 
Sorry, but Pryzbilla is NOT worth that kind of money which he showed the minute the ink on his contract was dry.

I cannot think of a reason why the Kings would do this. If I recall the only really good games Przybilla had were against us...

Really? He still brings something we sorely lack (defense and shotblocking) at the expense of something we have too much of (one-dimensional scoring).
 
Sorry, but it doesn't make us better. And his contract is a year longer than SAR's.
 
Start Pryz at center, move Brad over to PF and have Kenny come off the bench at the 4...

C-Pryz
PF-Miller
SF-Artest
SG-Martin
PG-Bibby

Bench
Corliss
K9
Cisco
Douby
Price
Williams
Salmons

I don't think that this trade would be that bad for us..I actually think that it would make us a little bit better. I surely don't think that it would make us any worse.
 
But it smacks of bandaid, short-term fix. I'm really hoping for so much more than that - if not by the trade deadline then during the off-season.
 
While I do agree that this trade would not make the Kings title contenders, it is actually a decent trade that could end up helping in the long run if other moves are made either this year or in the offseason.
 
Yes, but he's also three years younger, four inches taller, and has a
+/- 8.6 points higher.

SAR: 10.1 PPG, 5.2 RPG .51 BPG 26.1 MPG

Joelzilla: 2.0 PPG 4.0 RPG 1.59 BPG 16.4 MPG

I'm not saying this is the end-all-be-all of trades, and may or may not fit a blowup/youth movement. But if your goal is to get bigger and more defensive down low, I don't see why you'd be against this move. He's not going to be KG, or even Brendan Wright, but he's a start at some semblance of a decent frontcourt.
 
But it smacks of bandaid, short-term fix. I'm really hoping for so much more than that - if not by the trade deadline then during the off-season.

Well, if you can get a SAR for Duhon and Sweentey's expiring, sure. But SAR right now embodies our mediocrity. He's nether essential to our offense, helping us on the defensive end, nor a young big with potential to do one of those two things. It may be band aid, but it's better than letting the wound fester.
 
Back
Top