Everything you say is correct but you're not thinking through the decision-making process correctly. Pete had an end game in mind from the start, and each personnel decision had to be made in light of how to maneuver towards an ultimate goal, which means you have to think in terms not just of how much a player is "worth" in terms of a simplistic cap vs talent calculation, but in terms of what different contracts allow you to do.
Pete was maneuvering for Rudy, so he had to assess the best way to deal with Tyreke's RFA in light of that. He also had an ongoing dialogue with Masai, and used that information to make the right move to get there - which he did.
Again, each point you're making is right, but the heart of our disagreement comes down to 1- how much we value Rudy vs Gay; and 2- the fact that you're approaching this like a fantasy football team and not a poker game.
Saying the trades "aren't linked in any real way" is exactly the flaw with your thinking, as well as with the flaw in the laundry lists of bad moves that people are making here. Everything is interconnected, and sometimes you have to move backwards in order to advance to your ultimate goal.
I get that you don't like the way this team is assembled, that's fine. But I've been watching basketball for years and it is clear to me that our starting 5 is solid, well balanced, and built for the playoffs. Getting upset over the Evans trade is short-sighted.
I understand that you have principled reasons for not liking this particular iteration of the roster, and I also understand that an equally good roster could have been built in a different way. But that's not the right way to assess what Pete has done here - you look at his overall vision, his effectiveness in realizing it, and the on-court results. I am confident that we make the playoffs next year - if that happens, who the hell cares if it could've been done a slightly different way?
You're making a lot of assumptions. I very much like this starting five. I was praising D'Alessandro at the beginning of the season because it seemed like he built a starting unit that was tailor made for Malone's coaching style. It's part of why I was so gobsmacked and frustrated to see Malone fired. I thought we had a GM and coach in lock step and I was excited about the future. I wasn't all that upset to see Evans go. He hadn't developed as we'd hoped, probably benefitted from a change of scenery and he and Cousins were a very difficult pair to try and build around. And I didn't actually want Evans and Gay in the same starting lineup. My point all along has simply been that the two moves aren't related.
Evans couldn't have been part of "let's get Rudy Gay endgame" or D'Alessandro wouldn't have flown down to try and convince Tyreke to resign with the Kings for a hometown bargain rate. And he probably also wouldn't have offered a deal to Andre Iguodala who wouldn't be a great fit next to Gay and would have meant $32 million in capspace tied up in two wings that aren't really that complimentary and neither of whom are good outside shooters. For that matter it wasn't a foregone conclusion that the Kings would acquire Gay. What if Rudy had started the season really hot for the Raptors? Or what if Toronto got an offer they liked slightly more? I do believe PDA floated the notion of Rudy Gay to Vivek as one potential scenario when he interviewed for the job. But I can't believe he was hellbent on making that exact move come hell or high water.
Our starting five is well balanced and built for the playoffs. And yet if two years of rumors are to be believed PDA has been actively trying to trade Jason Thompson from the get go. Remember the rumor of Deron Williams and Mason Plumlee? And that's my fear, that D'Alessandro ISN'T building a team designed for the playoffs but wants more running and gunning.
We're fans, we're always going to quibble over roster moves and certainly I wouldn't have made some of the moves our GM did, but the biggest issue to me is that he destroyed a promising season for no apparent reason.
I'm not going to forget what an awful move that was but I AM excited to see what George Karl can bring to this team. Hopefully we do see a much improved Kings team going forward. Because I don't want to constantly be harping on ownership and the front office. I want to praise them for doing a good job. You and I just vastly disagree on whether they have so far.
To me being the sixth worst team in the league (yet AGAIN) and being widely excoriated for such a pointless torpedoing of the season and flushing away all the goodwill that accompanied that hot start is not a season where the GM should be congratulated. But to be fair to D'Alessandro, the season isn't over yet. We'll see.
Last edited: