I disagree, but not entirely. Do I think a Tyreke/Wall backcourt could work? Yes, to a certain extent. Do I think it would be as versatile both offesively and defensively as a Tyreke/Turner(or Turner type)? No. Do I think a Tyreke/Wall backcourt is more talented than a Tyreke/Turner backcourt? Yes. Having Wall would be a good problem to have. I won't disagree with you about his talent. But in the best interest of the team, I personally see pairing Tyreke with Turner, or another tall, versatile guard, as the way to go. Turner doesn't have the hype, and isn't flashy, but I do think he's a future allstar that compliments Tyrekevery well.
Back to going after another pg. I see Tyreke as a pg. Move him off the ball, his game suffers. I can't see pairing him with a pg actually helping his game. Just don't see it. When you take the ball out of his hands, his isn't half as dangerous. I see the same in Wall. Beno compliments Tyreke well because he spreads the floor, can spot up from 3, shoots well coming off screens, with or without the ball, and can create well with the pick & roll.
So if you want to move Tyreke off the ball, and bring in another pg, Wall or someone else, what kind of a pg exactly are you looking for? Wall needs the ball to be a threat. If you bring in a complete pass first pg who isn't a scoring threat, that pg would be useless without the ball. It's tough to set up Tyreke if Tyreke can't hit open jumpers and doesn't move well without the ball. If you bring in an allstar calliber pg thats a great shooter, like CP3, that would work better, but I don't see them complimenting eachother that well. They both need the ball to be at their best. If Tyreke was the one breaking down defenses and hitting CP3 or another pg for jumpers, he would essentially be playing the point, and whoever is catching those passes and shooting the jumpers would be filling he sg role. I just don't see how moving Tyreke off the ball helps.
