ForlornKing said:Watson/Price
Bonzi/Martin
Pierce/Cicso
SAR/Skinner
Magloire/Gadzuric
No offense meant whatsoever, Forlorn King, but boy does that lineup suck.

ForlornKing said:Watson/Price
Bonzi/Martin
Pierce/Cicso
SAR/Skinner
Magloire/Gadzuric
ForlornKing said:Boston Trade:
Pierce
Lafreanz
Boston Receive:
Bibby
Nene
Kt
Sacto Trade:
Bibby
Peja
Miller
Sacto Receives
Watson
Pierce
Magloire
Gadz
Gaines
Denver Trades:
Nene
Watson
Denver Receives
Peja
Milwuake Trades:
Magloire
Gadz
Gaines
Milwuake Receives:
Miller
Williamson
New Lineup
Watson/Price
Bonzi/Martin
Pierce/Cicso
SAR/Skinner
Magloire/Gadzuric
VF21 said:No offense meant whatsoever, Forlorn King, but boy does that lineup suck.
![]()
I am not trying to be mean but KG trades are not worth talking about because never going to happen, its not that the trade is bad.BMiller52 said:So is anyone going to touch my KG trade or is it that bad???
DaMan said:I don't see why boston would do this deal, they are rebuilding. So i only could image that they would not be doing any deal which would cause them to gain contracts. Why not just keep Paul, if they were going to do this trade. They have great young players with west and jefferson so i don't see them having much interset in bibby or thomas. And why do the bucks trade magloire? The only why we get Pierce is if we trade him stright up for Willamson and Peja and maybe adding a draft pick would seal the deal.
I would have to disagree i love the lineup but I just don't think the trade has a realisc chance of happening.VF21 said:No offense meant whatsoever, Forlorn King, but boy does that lineup suck.
![]()
ForlornKing said:Correct.
I'm not expeting the King's to be a title contender after that trade.
I would take that over this line-up every day of the week.
We aren't going to get much trading the core away. That is max what we wil get.
DaMan said:I would have to disagree i love the lineup but I just don't think the trade has a realisc chance of happening.
Please tell me why would Boston take two big contracts in bibby and thomas when they are rebuilding. The only reason way they are trading Pierce is because of his big contract so why would they want to gain any more?ForlornKing said:Which Boston would NOT do.
You are not getting Pierce for Peja and Corliss.
Sorry...You just aren't. Boston could get soooooo much more for Pierce.
LoL, i am all for trading sar for anybody that help the kings. My favorite trade thus far was the chandler/Nonich for sar/peja/hart trade.VF21 said:yeah, but that's just because it has SAR still on the Kings.
![]()
Not going to happen, but no idea why a Watson/Bonzi/Pierce/SAR/Magliore starting crew with Gadzuric/Skinner off the bench up front and the kids at the backup 1-3 is a sucky lineup. Actually quite a good one. A #1 scorer (Pierce) a #2 (SAR) a #3 (Bonzi) and bangers , boarders, hustlers, defenders all over the floor. That's a 50 win team.ForlornKing said:Watson/Price
Bonzi/Martin
Pierce/Cicso
SAR/Skinner
Magloire/Gadzuric
VF21 said:If that's the max we can expect to get by trading the core away, we might as well keep them.
BMiller52 - My problem with a lot of these trade posts are people put too much information into them. I personally like what ForlornKing did, although I didn't really care for the players involved. We all pretty much know the stats of the people involved. Just give us the names in a clear format.
![]()
I got to agree with u brick, I love the trade but there is almost no chance of the trade happening.Bricklayer said:Not going to happen, but no idea why a Watson/Bonzi/Pierce/SAR/Magliore starting crew with Gadzuric/Skinner off the bench up front and the kids at the backup 1-3 is a sucky lineup. Actually quite a good one. A #1 scorer (Pierce) a #2 (SAR) a #3 (Bonzi) and bangers , boarders, hustlers, defenders all over the floor. That's a 50 win team.
Bricklayer said:Not going to happen, but no idea why a Watson/Bonzi/Pierce/SAR/Magliore starting crew with Gadzuric/Skinner off the bench up front and the kids at the backup 1-3 is a sucky lineup. Actually quite a good one. A #1 scorer (Pierce) a #2 (SAR) a #3 (Bonzi) and bangers , boarders, hustlers, defenders all over the floor. That's a 50 win team.
Bricklayer said:Not going to happen, but no idea why a Watson/Bonzi/Pierce/SAR/Magliore starting crew with Gadzuric/Skinner off the bench up front and the kids at the backup 1-3 is a sucky lineup. Actually quite a good one. A #1 scorer (Pierce) a #2 (SAR) a #3 (Bonzi) and bangers , boarders, hustlers, defenders all over the floor. That's a 50 win team.
Bricklayer said:Not going to happen, but no idea why a Watson/Bonzi/Pierce/SAR/Magliore starting crew with Gadzuric/Skinner off the bench up front and the kids at the backup 1-3 is a sucky lineup. Actually quite a good one. A #1 scorer (Pierce) a #2 (SAR) a #3 (Bonzi) and bangers , boarders, hustlers, defenders all over the floor. That's a 50 win team.
DaMan said:I don't see why boston would do this deal, they are rebuilding. So i only could image that they would not be doing any deal which would cause them to gain contracts. Why not just keep Paul, if they were going to do this trade. They have great young players with west and jefferson so i don't see them having much interset in bibby or thomas. And why do the bucks trade magloire? The only why we get Pierce is if we trade him stright up for Willamson and Peja and maybe adding a draft pick would seal the deal.
Then why not just keep pierce then, he would do that better then any body they would bring in. Look boston is still in rebuilding mode the only why he gets traded is if it is for exp contracts and draft picks.ForlornKing said:Boston has already re-builded.
They have a TON of youth in Jefferson, Perkins, West, and they want somebody who can come in and score Right now.
VF21 said:Then we disagree. You like it; I don't. Possibly because I don't like the idea of getting rid of Peja, Bibby AND Miller. I guess I'm just a sentimental softie.
DaMan said:Then why not just keep pierce then, he would do that better then any body they would bring in. Look boston is still in rebuilding mode the only why he gets traded is if it is for exp contracts and draft picks.
In other news, I live in Orlando, and franices is pretty much gone right now, it's just like the artest stuation. Franices is suspended and now i am hearing from some magic forums that he has just demamded a trade, so franices is now on the market if the kings want him which i think they don't.
ForlornKing said:Boston Trade:
Pierce
Lafreanz
Boston Receive:
Bibby
Nene
Kt
Sacto Trade:
Bibby
Peja
Miller
Sacto Receives
Watson
Pierce
Magloire
Gadz
Gaines
Denver Trades:
Nene
Watson
Denver Receives
Peja
Milwuake Trades:
Magloire
Gadz
Gaines
Milwuake Receives:
Miller
Williamson
New Lineup
Watson/Price
Bonzi/Martin
Pierce/Cicso
SAR/Skinner
Magloire/Gadzuric
Bricklayer said:Doesn't have much to do with whether that would be a winning team or not.
I am with u, if i were the kings would not even touch Steve. A Ballhogg and Cancer i doubt that the kings would go after him.JJ22L said:....please God no
foretaz said:sorry....the same is basically the same for bibby as it is for franchise....
no interest....if bibby could play defense, it might be a bit more tempting-though not likely due to payroll issues...