hrdboild said:Does anybody else have any realistic trades? I'm rather tired of seeing the same old Artest and KG trades...
EckoDemiks said:I would trade Mike Bibby and Kenny Thomas for Kirk Hinrich and Antonio Davis. We get a great pg that plays defense and the bulls are young so they need a veteran leader in Bibby. Plus they get rid of Davis' contract. Then I would trade Peja and Skinner for Artest and Pollard. Now we have more toughness and Reggie Miller is retiring so they would want another good shooter. If a Joel Przybilla, Chris Kaman, Jerome James etc. plays against us we bring out Pollard. After that, trade Corliss Williamson and 2 1st round picks to Atlanta for Al Harrington. We get a good rebounder and scorer and they would want the picks to rebuild in the following years. We should also re-sign Maurice Evans and Matt Barnes.
PG Kirk Hinrich/Bobby Jackson
SG Maurice Evans/Kevin Martin (anyone could start actually)
SF Ron Artest/Matt Barnes
PF Al Harrington/Darius Songaila/Antonio Davis
C Brad Miller/Scott Pollard
EckoDemiks said:I would trade Mike Bibby and Kenny Thomas for Kirk Hinrich and Antonio Davis. We get a great pg that plays defense and the bulls are young so they need a veteran leader in Bibby. Plus they get rid of Davis' contract. Then I would trade Peja and Skinner for Artest and Pollard. Now we have more toughness and Reggie Miller is retiring so they would want another good shooter. If a Joel Przybilla, Chris Kaman, Jerome James etc. plays against us we bring out Pollard. After that, trade Corliss Williamson and 2 1st round picks to Atlanta for Al Harrington. We get a good rebounder and scorer and they would want the picks to rebuild in the following years. We should also re-sign Maurice Evans and Matt Barnes.
PG Kirk Hinrich/Bobby Jackson
SG Maurice Evans/Kevin Martin (anyone could start actually)
SF Ron Artest/Matt Barnes
PF Al Harrington/Darius Songaila/Antonio Davis
C Brad Miller/Scott Pollard/Greg Ostertag
VF21 said:Have you bothered to run any of those through realgm.com?
Bottom line for me is that you have just created a team of mediocrity...with no flash OR substance and no chance of making it out of the first round, if they're lucky enough to get to the playoffs to begin with...
That lineup doesn't even look good at all.VF21 said:A Hinrich, Evans, Artest, Harrington, Miller starting five would not impress me in the least.
chelle said:I loved watching Hinrich play in college and have become an even bigger fan of his since he has been on the Bulls, however, I do not see how we improve by giving up Bibby to get him. Hinrich is a better defender, hands down, but Bibby is a better leader and all around better player. I think that we need to focus on other positions to improve other than the point.
EckoDemiks said:So your saying take out the Mike Bibby trade and make it like this:
PG Mike Bibby/Bobby Jackson
SG Maurice Evans/Kevin Martin (anyone could start actually)
SF Ron Artest/Matt Barnes
PF Al Harrington/Darius Songaila/Antonio Davis
C Brad Miller/Scott Pollard/Greg Ostertag
Hmmmm... that's a good line up also. It's a good line up either way IMO. I was just thinking in the long term when Hinrich fully developes his skills. But yeah I see what your saying.
EckoDemiks said:So your saying take out the Mike Bibby trade and make it like this:
PG Mike Bibby/Bobby Jackson
SG Maurice Evans/Kevin Martin (anyone could start actually)
SF Ron Artest/Matt Barnes
PF Al Harrington/Darius Songaila/Antonio Davis
C Brad Miller/Scott Pollard/Greg Ostertag
Hmmmm... that's a good line up also. It's a good line up either way IMO. I was just thinking in the long term when Hinrich fully developes his skills. But yeah I see what your saying.
VF21 said:PG - Acceptable
SG - Are you kidding?
SF - See SG
PF - Oh God, shoot me now
C - See PF
What are you trying for? A lottery pick?
thesanityannex said:yeah, like the lakers were tryin for this year
thesanityannex said:it seems to be of general consensus here that MOST want bibby and miller to stay.
i feel the same way, but have been entertaining the thought of miller leaving. of course the kings would lose offense, but are there any ideas out there of a replacement for brad cause his D is WEAK. whats his contract worth??? i dont think there will be any real plausible ways to work this out so i guess my comment is pointless. glad i tired out my fingers for this post.
VF21 said:PG - Acceptable
SG - Are you kidding?
SF - See SG
PF - Oh God, shoot me now
C - See PF
What are you trying for? A lottery pick?
VF21 said:You're tired now? ...
Oh, you are so going to understand the true meaning of "tired" come October or so...
![]()
Bricklayer said:For our high bball IQ pass/jumpshot offense? No.
For an athletic freak to fix our weaknesses? Absolutely.
Mentioned in another thread that this is where a younger Webber was so valuable -- had the bball I.Q. and passing/shooting skills to play in our offense, while still being a very good athlete/rebounder/shotblocker and giving us what we needed in those areas as well. But that's a very rare combo, and really unless we get K.G. almost anyone we bring in is kind of going to be one or the other. Either skilled, or athletic, but not likely both. Swift has all the athletic traits we need, but you just don't get the feeling that he's the sharpest tool in the shed.
Elektrik said:There seems to be a lot of talk about having Kevin Garnett here. I can't imagine Minny parting with him for anyone except Tim Duncan. Can we leave the KG trade talk out of it. Doesn't seem to be reality. Or am I missing something. I mean why would Minnesota do that.