you've got the economics right, but you're neglecting the politics. the nba does not want to further alienate their smaller market franchises by allowing ownership groups to continually force their way out of town to pursue bigger markets. its why david stern refused to sell the hornets to owners who would not commit to keeping the team in new orleans. there is exactly one way out for the maloofs: anaheim. that's it. they can temporarily function with their minimal profit margin in sacramento, but, one way or the other, the kings need a new arena to play in very soon, in either sacramento or in some other city. this fact hasn't changed. sac had an nba-approved arena deal on the table. the maloofs passed, after agreeing with a handshake, and after it was made clear that the nba was going to loan the maloofs every dollar of their share of the arena costs. that doesn't look good, no matter how impressive the maloofs powerpoint presentation may have been (eric musselman, anyone?)...
so, where else are the maloofs gonna go? i think the league would regrettably approve of a move to a place like kansas city, because its been an nba city, its got a nice new arena, and there's a viable market there. but its not gonna be enough to put the maloofs in the financial position they desire. it'd make more sense to sell now, otherwise they would have already attempted to get out to kansas city. the nba would probably also approve of a move to seattle, but its not like seattle has made even the tiniest fraction of progress on on a new arena, compared to what the city of sacramento accomplished in constructing its "handshake deal." so, where else is there? there's anaheim, but the relocation committee shot that down after kevin johnson secured $10 million dollars in local business sponsorship. that's it. $10 million, and solidarity in the form of billionaire ron burkle. now he's got an nba-approved deal that the maloofs have rejected on the table, and ron burkle is undoubtedly still #1 on kj's speed dial. who's got the leverage? its certainly not the maloofs, and how is a relocation committee going to approve of a move to anaheim now when they didn't do so before? the nba actually would force the maloofs out, a la george shinn, long before they approved of a move to anaheim...
giving up now is like folding with four-of-a-kind. you better believe the maloofs are holding a straight-flush if you do that, and we already know the maloofs ain't got ****...