Joshyjosh31
Starter
I tried telling y’all Kuzma was a good defender in LA and knew his role he wasn’t gonna go to a winning team and jack 30 shots while playing no defense. Could’ve had our wing on a good contract but no smh
Do you think he should? That sounds a little too much like overreach, to me.
Do we have reason to believe that he hasn't? Any reason to believe that he hasn't already taken the lay of the land, and hasn't taken further action because he knows that the BOG would not support it?Me personally, I'd give it serious consideration. Not a hard "yes", but closing that loophole probably is a net positive in my view. But I'd listen to teams, if most of them were against it I'd probably back down.
Crazy how they can always catch past prime role player on PEDs but you got a 40 year old dunking over 7 footers and being one of the best fast breaks players in the L.
Dude really had a cartoon henchman for a PA lol
Kev is 7-16 from 3 over the last 2 games. Will be interesting to see if he finds his shot
Embiid‘s knee is cooked. Not sure where the Sixers go from here
What about just allowing deadline trades (or really all trades) to have "and future considerations". I don't know if those have been erased from other leagues but I do seem to remember that sometimes trades in baseball and other sports would include future assets if a player re-signed or if the player played x% of games.The answer here depends on how seriously this "loophole" is seen as a problem. For instance, I would guess that right now the Lakers would not be in favor of such a change, but the Hornets might.
Me personally, I'd give it serious consideration. Not a hard "yes", but closing that loophole probably is a net positive in my view. But I'd listen to teams, if most of them were against it I'd probably back down.
What about just allowing deadline trades (or really all trades) to have "and future considerations". I don't know if those have been erased from other leagues but I do seem to remember that sometimes trades in baseball and other sports would include future assets if a player re-signed or if the player played x% of games.
Imagine if we had been able to trade Fox to another team but they could send/not send certain picks only if he re-signed?
On these deadline deals they could add or remove a pick or cash considerations if the physical failed and it went third party review/mediation. At least the player most likely doesn't change teams only to be changed back. That must be awful. Really the main loser in all of this was Mark Williams. Especially since Charlotte replaced him with Nurk. Would they have done that with Williams on the roster?
Maybe the situation is as simple as making the deadline one date for player movement with a window to sort out non-player compensation after the passing of physicals.
Given how broken Embiid seemed when he came into the league, it's impressive that he's had the career that he has had. If this is the end, I think he can be proud of his accomplishments
oh so his knee is cooked cooked.
I counted 10
LOL there are only like 14 assists here at best.
LOL there are only like 14 assists here at best.
LOL there are only like 14 assists here at best.
It wasn't even the home scorekeeper.I counted 10
They should let Joker play under FIBA rules: where, if the shooter is fouled on a field goal attempt, the person who made the last pass gets an assist if they make at least one free throw.You only have to watch the first one. Literally three dribbles and a step-back. Comical. I didn't watch further, did they give Jokic any assists on missed shots? Any assists where he threw the ball out of bounds? Any assists while he was sitting on the bench? Just checking, because they seem as likely.
It wasn't even the home scorekeeper.![]()