Bricklayer said:
I was goign to leave this alone...but:
1) I could not find the page you were referring to either. The corrected link heads to a page with collected numbers for Kings PFs.
2) It is largely irrelevant to the issue in any case -- Peja is butter soft despite being able to stay in front of his man too.
3) He has barely had to play anybody, and with the exception of the KG aberration, the few upper echelon PFs he has guarded (Duncan, Bosh, even Marion) had no problems whatsoever. So far we have avoided many of the best scoring PFs -- no Boozer's, Randolphs, J.Oneal's, Gasol's, Nowitzki's, Webber's, Brand's, Amare's etc. David West, Juwann Howard & Troy Murphy oh my.
4) As usual for Reef's career, his defensive plus/minus when he is on the court or off of it sucks. Per 100 possessions (just 82 games' standard number) teams score 107.7 pts against us with him on the court, and only 101.4 with him off the court. And their "Effective FG%" is 50.5% compared to 47.9 when he's on the bench. His 101.1 pts against/per48 (average of what the other team scores per 48min of time Reef is ont he floor) is dead last on the team. All of which is to say that even if he is a solid individual defender, he is Peja -- doesn't do enough of anything else, doesn't help his teammates, and hence is soft and we get scored on because of it.
5) I have mentioned an article by 82games stats-geek Dan Rosenblaum before in regards to Peja, who according to the numbers was the 2nd worst defending SF in the league for the past three seasons, despite beign a competent man to man defender. Well the same article finds another prominent King on the lists as the 9th worst (of 57) PF defender over the same span. And for the same reason. Soft, does not board. Does not block shots. Does not rotate strong or play physical. Note the methodology of the study. I do not present it as gospel (not being a fan of made up combo stats), but it is a strong attempt at quantification.
http://www.82games.com/rosenbaum3.htm .
1) Sorry for the broken links, for some reason some pages on that site work when I copy the link, some don't.
2) I suppose you can arbitrarily call someone soft, and we can argue till the cows come home about that label, I just think that SAR is defending well, and the numbers happen to back that up.
3) Duncan and Bosh scored a point or two above their season averages (but didn't exactly go off), Marion and KG scored below theirs. Overall, according to the stats on 82games.com, the SAR/KT combo is better defensively against opposing PFs than Webber/Songaila. (.419% opposing efg vs. .500%). I'm with you that the rebounding sucks, but something is working on the interior, and we all know it's not Brad.
4) This is just a personal bias, but the overall plus/minus thing is kind of dubious to me because so much of it depends on substitution rotations -- if a player happens to spend a disproportionate amount of time with the second unit, as SAR does, or, if you're looking at career numbers, if a player has spent time with crappy teams it's going to bring down the +/- number. I prefer to look at individual matchups. But that's just me.
Regarding the qualities you tick off as evidence of softness, I agree that he doesn't block shots well, but his perimeter rotating help defense is awesome, and one of the reasons teams have a hard time penetrating and getting layups against the Kings. He needs to board better, but that's a team effort. And I'm sorry, he hasn't hesitated to bang with anyone.
I've expressed this before, but those Rosenbaum numbers are utterly worthless. Matt Harpring the worst defending SF? Ben Gordon the second best defending SG? Cliffy the second worst defending PF? I mean, come on. Sure, some of the usual suspects are at the top and bottom, but he could have done better throwing darts.
To keep the Miller theme of this thread, I'll say this: whatever lapses there have been on interior defense, including rebounding (SAR is mostly a wash compared to opposing PFs) can be lain at Miller's earth-bound feet.
P.S. SAR is leading the team in PER differential. He scores a PER of 19.5 compared to 12.1 for his opponents. Miller, meanwhile, is allowing opposing centers score an astounding 22.5 compared to his own 19.1, meaning there's statistical evidence that he's turning opposing centers into All-Stars.
(Finding this info under the "Roland Ratings" section of 82games.com -- these numbers are through 12/5)
P.P.S. Just for fun, Webber's PER is 18.7, and his opponents are 16.5.