...somethings happening.
I'm really high on Bagley, but I've got my heart set on a certain somebody for the past week now. Mixed emotions just knowing how much this organization has continually screwed up the last 10 years.Fffffffffff. I'm going to go bury my head in the sand.
I am done arguing. I am in celebration mode.There have been numerous well argumented posts about the value of players like Bagley in this thread. Try to argue one of those instead of making up an argument and arguing against it.
There are fans (and use the word fans to include those on blogs like the Ringer) who say Bagley has "highest bust potential". Excuse me, what are you looking at?! I think Bagley is an extremely low risk pick. Bagley can get 10 PPG and 6 RPG in 15 MPG without any plays being run for him on athleticism and instincts. This is baseline productivity. He is likely to produce much more. Where the mistake occurs is when you conclude he is a center, declare he cannot defend centers, he will not be able to stay on the floor against centers, period, end of story, bust. He's not a conventional center, he's more a combo forward who you put in pick and roll, will run constantly, attack the boards and pick his spots from perimeter. He needs to work on his handles, right hand and strength. This will all come with time and dedication, then watch out.
Dude's being set up to disappoint. They're talking him up like baby Webber... let's just get him on the court for a little before the ridiculous hyperbole kicks in?
Assuming Giles is really something close to what he's been billed to be they are both mobile enough to play together, but who the heck knows? Bagley has some things he really needs to work on to be successful in the NBA in my opinion but by all accounts he's a hard worker with a really high ceiling so I'd be confident he would improve in the areas he needed to.Do Giles and Bagley really pair well together? All I hear about is offense with these guys. Who is going to play d? And who is our starting SF?
I'm going to be forced to drink the kool aid until November if Bagley is the guy but I just don't see the basketball rationale.
Unless everything about Giles is a lie. Then I'll never trust this FO again.
If Bagley is the pick (and it definitely looks like he is) and Giles looks good in summer league, I wonder what the over/under on trading WCS is? A month? Six months?
If there's a downside to picking Bagley it is that we'll see lots more high post action with two bigs from Joerger and no reason to evolve the offense to more of a motion, pace & space concept.
I honestly think Vlade would have to drastically remake the roster to force Joerger to adapt. Instead I fear we'll see the Sacramento version of Grit & Grind when really this team should be pushing the pace.
If Bagley is the pick (and it definitely looks like he is) and Giles looks good in summer league, I wonder what the over/under on trading WCS is? A month? Six months?
If there's a downside to picking Bagley it is that we'll see lots more high post action with two bigs from Joerger and no reason to evolve the offense to more of a motion, pace & space concept.
I honestly think Vlade would have to drastically remake the roster to force Joerger to adapt. Instead I fear we'll see the Sacramento version of Grit & Grind when really this team should be pushing the pace.
If they picked Doncic I honestly think there would be issues between Fox and Doncic. Doncic absolutely needs the ball in his hands to be effective. Fox, on the other hand, would not be interested in being secondary when it comes to playmaking. I just can't see that working.
I would trade Cauley-Stein regardless. He's far too mercurial to lock in with the type of huge contract extension it's going to take to keep him from other teams next year.
Do Giles and Bagley really pair well together? All I hear about is offense with these guys. Who is going to play d? And who is our starting SF?
I'm going to be forced to drink the kool aid until November if Bagley is the guy but I just don't see the basketball rationale.
Unless everything about Giles is a lie. Then I'll never trust this FO again.
If we draft Bagley, I wouldn't be surprised to see WCS traded tonight.
Can't wait 6 mos to move Cauley-Stein. Rookie enders at the deadline rarely pull much in return. Giving a team a full year to look at a player like that is the way to go.
If Bagley is the pick (and it definitely looks like he is).
Why is everyone suddenly saying this? What have I missed in the past couple of hours?
Woj, after agreeing to not announce picks, announced how the first six picks are "shaping up". Marc Spears has said the team has decided on Bagley. A few others. Again, doesn't mean it's true but that's where all the signs are pointing to the point that Damien Barling and Jason Ross were on 1140 talking about it as if Bagley was definitely the pick.
He also didn’t attach a team to the #4 selection.Woj, after agreeing to not announce picks, announced how the first six picks are "shaping up". Marc Spears has said the team has decided on Bagley. A few others. Again, doesn't mean it's true but that's where all the signs are pointing to the point that Damien Barling and Jason Ross were on 1140 talking about it as if Bagley was definitely the pick.
Yeah, I heard the Ross/Barling thing and was perplexed. Then reading this site, still perplexed.
So Woj and Spears said it so it’s right but Mychal Thompson said Doncic and it’s wrong? I don’t get it.
I don't really want to believe it but I guess I'm preparing myself for disappointment.Yeah, I heard the Ross/Barling thing and was perplexed. Then reading this site, still perplexed.
So Woj and Spears said it so it’s right but Mychal Thompson said Doncic and it’s wrong? I don’t get it.
Yeah, I heard the Ross/Barling thing and was perplexed. Then reading this site, still perplexed.
So Woj and Spears said it so it’s right but Mychal Thompson said Doncic and it’s wrong? I don’t get it.