uolj
Starter
That post was a joke... but the actual deal isn't 100% yet.What?? He's a restricted free agent! Oh, say it isn't so.
That post was a joke... but the actual deal isn't 100% yet.What?? He's a restricted free agent! Oh, say it isn't so.
He's good at re-tweeting info, though!apparently our guy Jason Jones is totally out of the loop. All the national guys beating him on info here. sigh...
Jason Jones is too busy pretending to be a Laker beat writer.apparently our guy Jason Jones is totally out of the loop. All the national guys beating him on info here. sigh...
apparently our guy Jason Jones is totally out of the loop. All the national guys beating him on info here. sigh...
He doesn't appear to have (m)any sources.
Cool. Other teams must've been interested for it to be 8 million per. Congrats to MT and the Kings. They have all kinds of offensive weapons.
Updated: December 9, 2011, 11:51 AM PTGuard Marcus Thornton has re-signed with the Sacramento Kings, according to his agent, Tony Dutt.
...
That post was a joke... but the actual deal isn't 100% yet.
I also wonder if it was part of a plan to stay above the minimum salary level.How long to wait, though? Other teams knew the Kings would sign him around that number, and no other teams would go above that. Sure, the Kings could've low-balled him all the way into the start of the season. More of a good faith deal than a potentially scarring hard-nosed business deal over a couple million dollars.
This is my problem with it. He's a restricted FA. That gives you all the leverage. If someone else makes a bid and you're willing to match it, you can. Why come out of the gates on day 1 with probably the highest deal and number of years he should have ever been given. At 5-6M, he's a young guy on a really good deal. Even if he doesn't work well with the team for some reason, you still have a young scorer at a very reasonable deal. $8M, too high.
He's shown what he can do in flashes. He's also had a couple lulls in his 2 year career where things didn't seem to be going right. That happens to young guys so I don't think you look at his potential but once again the Kings seem to bid against themselves.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/7...on-five-year-40-million-deal-according-source
Updated: December 9, 2011, 11:51 AM PT
How long to wait, though? Other teams knew the Kings would sign him around that number, and no other teams would go above that. Sure, the Kings could've low-balled him all the way into the start of the season. More of a good faith deal than a potentially scarring hard-nosed business deal over a couple million dollars.
Two sources say the aforementioned "snag" is not expected to hold up the return of Marcus Thornton to the Kings.
@sam_amick
Sam Amick
Two sources say the aforementioned "snag" is not expected to hold up the return of Marcus Thornton to the Kings.
Actuall they could only lowball him for three days, Under the new CBA you have three days to match any offer, after that, you lose the restricted rights.
First mi amigo, how do you know his agent didn't show up with offers from other teams? All the teams were able to make offers, they just couldn't consumate them until today. So if there were other offers, I'm sure the Kings were aware of them prior till today. So its just as likely that they matched an offer, as it is that the just decided to throw 8 mil a year at him. Since Petrie never divulges anything, its hard to know the truth.
Actually they could only lowball him for three days, Under the new CBA you have three days to match any offer, after that, you lose the restricted rights.
Indeed! Welcome back Marcus! Ok...thats a great start...now...we need to get Sammy D re-signed!
To be fair, he was covering the Raiders until last week.
That would be under the assumption somebody other than the Kings made him an offer today. The other poster was suggesting the Kings should've waited for an offer and match it.