Darn I thought by your thread that we signed him. I guess we'll just have to wait a little more for some good news to develop from Kingsland![]()
Candyman may have a little more game in him than Wright but he is a nutter AND an underachiver. One of the factors the team needs to consider now if they plan to keep one or more of the young guys for the front line is INFLUENCE. This is one of the great intangables that the team lost when Vlade went back south. Up till now the tempo for the fornt line and the attitude is set by Miller and the SAR K9 duo... not exactly feirce, hard working and professional. SAR has a great attitude and showed guts in his injured play but it ends there. Kennys whining about starts, pouting off the bench and general knuckle headedness is far from a GOOD influence and Brad's poor condition and weak inside play almost seems contagious.Wright may not be a great shotblocker but he is a pretty good defender. I would rather Olowokandi who is certainly a presence in the paint.
Even if Williams makes the team, you can't ask a rookie "our interior defense depends on you and if you do bad we lose". A rookie can be depended on to a certain extent.
i didn't say depend on him. i am saying he is just as good as the trio that keeps poping up here. I sure wouldn't want to depend on those guys that are AS GOOD AS THEY ARE GOING TO GET!!!! Willams gives us what we need now and the sky is the limit on what he can be.
The problem with rookies is that their often out of position for the play thats being run. Gerold Wallace was a terrific athelete but was always out of position or just plain standing around. Now, after 4 or 5 years in the league he's learned. I'm not trying to bad mouth Williams. He may be one of those exeptions. I just wouldn't count on him to be the cure for what ails the Kings. At least not yet.![]()
Candyman may have a little more game in him than Wright but he is a nutter AND an underachiver. One of the factors the team needs to consider now if they plan to keep one or more of the young guys for the front line is INFLUENCE. This is one of the great intangables that the team lost when Vlade went back south. Up till now the tempo for the fornt line and the attitude is set by Miller and the SAR K9 duo... not exactly feirce, hard working and professional. SAR has a great attitude and showed guts in his injured play but it ends there. Kennys whining about starts, pouting off the bench and general knuckle headedness is far from a GOOD influence and Brad's poor condition and weak inside play almost seems contagious.
Enter Ron and things look better (It also helps to have Brad doing the Team USA games) I think whne we are looking at these LLE/Vet's minimum guys attitude, work ethinc and the desire/ablity to school the Kids is MORE important than the hairs breadh of differance they have in skills or years left in the leage. Wright is no Lou Gehrig but he is more likely to meet the guys in the gym for a work out than to take them drinking the night before a game. Roughtly the same can be said for Cato. Pollard is a good force in the locker room but Im not sold he has any real edge on Cato or Wright. But Owolocandi has never been the kind of guy to stay late, inspire teammates or even give a rat's patootie about wining for himself.
Except the payoff of Kandi working out is so much greater. Plus if he could be signed for the LLE you just do it and ask questions later. I have seen too many guys like Kandi walk throught the door of Arco and succeed when nobody thought they would.
Well in THEORY you are right. Cato and Wright have NO chance of improvment. Great thin about being a chronic underachiver is that you ALLWAYS have potential, but realisticly if you have not done squat in the NBA by the time you are arround 30 you just never will so the odds of Candyman improving are about the same as your odds of wining the lottery. Sure they are better than your neighbor who never buys tickets but not by a stastically signifficant ammount.Except the payoff of Kandi working out is so much greater. Plus if he could be signed for the LLE you just do it and ask questions later. I have seen too many guys like Kandi walk throught the door of Arco and succeed when nobody thought they would.
Lets not lose prospective here. Williams went undrafted. Whether we like it or not, there's a reason for that. Do undrafted players make NBA teams? Yes, a few do. Do they excell in the league? Not many, but it does happen. Brad Miller for example. You say we only need him for his defense not his offense. I seem to remember that if your on the floor for defense your also on the other end of the floor. Or maybe you don't know where to be on the other end of the floor.
The problem with rookies is that their often out of position for the play thats being run. Gerold Wallace was a terrific athelete but was always out of position or just plain standing around. Now, after 4 or 5 years in the league he's learned. I'm not trying to bad mouth Williams. He may be one of those exeptions. I just wouldn't count on him to be the cure for what ails the Kings. At least not yet.![]()
Well in THEORY you are right. Cato and Wright have NO chance of improvment. Great thin about being a chronic underachiver is that you ALLWAYS have potential, but realisticly if you have not done squat in the NBA by the time you are arround 30 you just never will so the odds of Candyman improving are about the same as your odds of wining the lottery. Sure they are better than your neighbor who never buys tickets but not by a stastically signifficant ammount.
The BIG problem is not what Owolokandi MIGHT bring but what he WILL bring, a lazy, disruptive presence. This is a risk you can take when the potential is great enough but in his case I just don't that being the case.
In starter minutes, Olowokandi has shown he is a legit 12 point, 9 rebound, and 2 block center.