Little pro-Kings tidbit from SI article

From an article talking about how the Heat and Mavs will fare next year.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/ian_thomsen/06/22/future/index.html


The Clippers, Nuggets and Lakers are each one or two moves away from challenging Dallas, but the most provocative outsider may be the Sacramento Kings with their intriguing starting five and the intense presence of new coach Eric Musselman. The Pacific could replace the Southwest as the best division in the West next season.

Haha yea pretty small table scrap stuck in the end of the article, but hey, wat ya gonna do, tdosssbbq

:)
 
Lakers are more than 1 or 2 moves away from challenging Dallas. Heck, I only know 3 or 4 of their players off the top of my head.
 
same article - "in hopes that the unfortunate but altogether necessary experience of the '06 Finals will inspire Dirk Nowitzki"

He seemed real "inspired" to me.
 
Petrie said he and Muss are looking for interior d and a back-up PG this off-season.

AKA no rookie back-up PGs for the Kings ;)
 
I think the Lakers are one or two moves away from being really good. The problem is that they don't have any trade bate to make those one or two moves....
 
Petrie said he and Muss are looking for interior d and a back-up PG this off-season.

AKA no rookie back-up PGs for the Kings ;)

He said that they were looking for a backup PG so that means no rookie? What if Armstrong, Sene, and Johnson are all gone when we pick? What if there is some NBA ready PG prospects available when we pick? Petrie may have no choice but to take a PG...
 
Hyperbole. Sacramento will not benefit from casual hyperbole or unfounded opinions.

Topic spin-off (theft).

National sports analysts hyped the American National Soccer Team, at least before the World Cup. We have nearly 300,000,000 people in the USA, as wells as tens of millions of soccer players and fans. Why can't we field a world-class team? I think it is the chronic influence of veteran player-coaches like Claudio Arena. Whatever he is doing, and has done, it dooesn't work. I think Arena has a Latin American finese-ball mentality. We need to start using our bigger and tougher European players.
 
Last edited:
He said that they were looking for a backup PG so that means no rookie? What if Armstrong, Sene, and Johnson are all gone when we pick? What if there is some NBA ready PG prospects available when we pick? Petrie may have no choice but to take a PG...

I'd be quite surprised if we end up deciding right at the draft - totally blowing off the summer dealings, that our back-up PG will be a rookie.

In that case, I'd hope that who we draft for that would be able to play defense behind Bibby. Wouldn't be my first or second option, but I would be fine with that.
 
If Rajon Rondo is still available, I think you at least have to think about it. He's got the potential to be the best defender in the league at the point further down the road. And he was a star scorer in high school too. I would agree that the pick would be better used on an interior defender, but if your top choices are gone, you've got to take what's available. But isn't this getting into 'Personnel Moves' territory?
 
Hyperbole. Sacramento will not benefit from casual hyperbole or unfounded opinions.

Topic spin-off (theft).

National sports analysts hyped the American National Soccer Team, at least before the World Cup. We have nearly 300,000 people in the USA, as wells as tens of millions of soccer players and fans. Why can't we field a world-class team? I think it is the chronic influence of veteran player-coaches like Claudio Arena. Whatever he is doing, and has done, it dooesn't work. I think Arena has a Latin American finese-ball mentality. We need to start using our bigger and tougher European players.

umm...what? :confused:
 
The Clippers are already there. The Lakers and Denver are in the same situation as us. We're all missing key pieces and are a move or two from being contenders. We know what we need; getting them while still retaining talent is the hard part.
 
If Rajon Rondo is still available, I think you at least have to think about it. He's got the potential to be the best defender in the league at the point further down the road. And he was a star scorer in high school too. I would agree that the pick would be better used on an interior defender, but if your top choices are gone, you've got to take what's available. But isn't this getting into 'Personnel Moves' territory?

Agreed...

Exactly. With him or Lowry, I'd be fine with it, and quite happy with the draft pick in general.

Guess it is... it'll be merged somewhere ;).

I think it goes... 1. Sac 2. Lakers ------- 4. Denver, in terms of who is closest.

Denver has a lot to figure out. Bench, shooting, defense, what bigs to keep, what bigs to let go, what bigs to get. New GM, I think also, not sure if they got one yet. Carmelo/Karl/Camby are of course the certainities.
 
Last edited:
Ostensably the Kings current starting 5 with SAR, Kevin and Cisco off the bench ARE dangerous and competitive. Last half of the season they kicked butt and got good licks in against the Spurs. If Muss can inspiret them and put togheter some stratagy give them some practice together and evne unchanged they will be conteneders and big fun to watch.

Now before folks go all response happy telling me our interior D sucks, Bibby's D sucks, Hart sucks, Brad has no inside game, Kenny is too small and other the other generally agreed upon criticims: I AM NOT ADVOCATING STAYING STATUS QUOE... I am only pointing out that the Kings are NO moves away from being pretty good, they are about 2 moves away from rocking the West. That is a BIG difference from the Lakers who are aobut 4 starters and a bench away even being competitive, or Denver who is at least a coach and one starter away from it. As for Cliperville... One more year ofmiles on Sam, could looses the new and improved Caveman, and very thin on the bench... were competitive this year but I would not bank on them for next season yet, too many factors in the mix just yet.

I for one can't wait to see what Geoff does this summer. and to see what the New Milimium Kings look like next season.
 
The Clippers are already there. The Lakers and Denver are in the same situation as us. We're all missing key pieces and are a move or two from being contenders. We know what we need; getting them while still retaining talent is the hard part.

Don't overrate the Clippers. They were not even that good last season. After a hot start, they finished the last 3 months 22-17 and the last two months 12-11. They have too many shoot first players and play mediocre defence. They managed to beat the bad teams consistantly, so give them credit for focus, but their weaknesses were exposed by the good teams. Last year here are their records against the best:

Sacramento - 0-4
Dallas - 1-3 (their win was against Dallas' bench the last game of the year)
San Antonio - 1-2
Memphis - 1-3
Detroit - 0-2
Miami - 1-1
Phoenix - 1-1 (Before KT got hurt for the year, they were 2-2 anyway)

Total: 4-16

By the end of the regular season, people were already starting to discount the Clippers. The only reason why people seem to think they are a near powerhouse team is because they were lucky enough to be on the JV side of the playoff bracket. So they beat Denver, who by that point was completely falling apart and was not playing like one of the top 8 teams in the west. Then they had a competitive series against a Phoenix team playing with no inside presence. The Suns were a taylor-made matchup for the Clippers. They had Marion and Diaw at the PF/C spot where the Clippers had Brand/Kaman. If Phoenix had Thomas and Stoudamire, it would have been a 5 game series at best. The truth is that the Clippers would have lost to San Antonio, Sacramento, or Dallas in a playoff series.

I don't want to go overboard with this. The Clippers are a good team. And they have some talented young players and could improve. However, people tend to remember them as a lot better than they actually were because of their success in the JV bracket. It happened to all of the teams on that side. People are way too high on the Lakers after watching them take Phoenix to 7 games, in a series where Kwame Brown and Chris Mihm looked good playing against the Suns vastly undersized frontcourt. Sportsguy was ready to give Amare the Ewing award after Phoenix beat two very flawed LA teams in 14 games. And people are overlooking a very poor second half of the season for the Clippers.

The Clippers also have some concerns for the future:

1 - The wheels could fall off their Cassell (37 in Nov.)/Mobley (31 on Sept. 1) backcourt at any time. Both are old and if the Clippers do resign Cassell, they will both be locked under big contracts for several years.

2 - Elgin Baylor is their GM. He did a nice job finally getting this team together, but look at his track record, do you really trust him too keep filling the holes and take them to the next level?

3 - Sterling is still notoriously cheap. It was nice that he shelled out money this past offseason. However, if their young players do develop at all (which they will need to for the Clippers' success), both Livingston and Kaman will command high salaries when they are free agents.

4 - Speaking of Livingston, the Clippers need him mature to go to the next level. However, he is still rail thin and already has a history of injury problems. Considering Cassell also has been spending more time on the DL, it seems realistic that the Clippers could spend long stretches without either of them.
 
Oh we are clearly a team to watch next season. At the start of last season I thought we had the talent to be much better than we were, but obviously changes were being made and it created an unsteady environment the last 2-3 seasons. I think our major rebuilding is done, its time to put on the bow and win that title!

The next 2 seasons are going to be very important for the Kings.
 
Back
Top