Long term one WILL triumph over the other, or they are both basically worthless entirely replaceable pieces. if they are platooning 24min a piece then yay, you can have your choice of 8ppg nothing SGs. A disgrace to a pretty damn good history of SGs that the Kings have had. So basically, unless they both suck miserably, the one who doesn't suck will dispatch the one who does suck, and the one who does suck, will turn into a 16min/gm nobody with no trade value and a questionable NBA future. That's the inevitability of having two young SGs occupying the same space. There is not room for both unless neither one is satisfactory and you are just searching for anything from them game to game just as we were with Ben and Thornton last year.
And as an aside, if one of the SGs is going to get reduced to 16min/gm status in the long run, you could do almost as well, and maybe even better, just having Marshon Brooks in that role. People always want to have their cake and eat it too. In our front office's case, to make moves and ignore their consequences. But no, you have to choose. And the sooner you choose, the better the chance to get something out of it.
P.S. one noteworthy, although doubtful possibility: let's say we use DWill to get Josh Smith. Well, even though he's flat too small, from the beginning of the season last year Jerry (yes I know, Jerry, but still) was mentioning the possibility of using Ben as a SF. Now he's 6'4" He ain't no SF. But his handle is a SFs handle. And if DWill is gone, coming off the bench he would only have to go against reserve SFs. There would be problems with the 6'9" guys. But there were problems with everybody else he had to guard last year too. In any case, that would be the one way you take a pair of purish SGs and get enough minutes to sustain both: you supplement one's minutes by playing him out of position somewhere. But you could do better.