You got me wrong, Baja. I also think you missed the follow up post where I stated that I'm quite happy with the win.
The post you've quoted was in response to someone that was pointing out a negative. I was trying to show that I don't have blinders on and can acknowledge that they were far from perfect. Furthermore, I also stated that I told a friend that the turnover fest wasn't at all typical for this team, especially considering the pace they play. It wasn't at all intended to be a debbie downer post. My apology if it came off that way.
I fully agree that this was a tremendous win and I am very excited about it (although I admit I was pulling out hair during the game).
While I do get frustrated with the team from time to time, I think you'll discover I'm not one to pollute the board with negative crap when the KINGS win. I'm not even all that tough on them when they lose.
I appreciate your feedback, though. And I don't mean that sarcastically, as I've always appreciated reading your thoughts and opinions.
The post you've quoted was in response to someone that was pointing out a negative. I was trying to show that I don't have blinders on and can acknowledge that they were far from perfect. Furthermore, I also stated that I told a friend that the turnover fest wasn't at all typical for this team, especially considering the pace they play. It wasn't at all intended to be a debbie downer post. My apology if it came off that way.
I fully agree that this was a tremendous win and I am very excited about it (although I admit I was pulling out hair during the game).
While I do get frustrated with the team from time to time, I think you'll discover I'm not one to pollute the board with negative crap when the KINGS win. I'm not even all that tough on them when they lose.
I appreciate your feedback, though. And I don't mean that sarcastically, as I've always appreciated reading your thoughts and opinions.
I have high expectations of Giles as well, but he's a little behind Bagley in the progression dept. I think it's important we don't get our expectations mixed up with reality. To think Giles is ready to start at center is wishful thinking, and not reality. To be honest, as I've said before, I think both Giles and Bagley are better suited to the PF position, and I think Bagley is closer to being a SF than he is a center. Matter of fact, I can visualize a line up of Fox, Buddy, Bagley, Giles, and Willie. Now that may be wishful thinking on my part. Or not!