EatMoreChicken
G-League
the solution is simple, Bonzi can sign for the league minimum. His agent f'up royally and should be a lesson to other FA's. greedy agents that only look out for their own interest should be fired.
But who's the winner?Folks this is not about Bonzi or really even about Salmons. How many times does a GM have to sit down with any particular palyer to negotiate a contract? Usually once, maybe twice and very very rarely three or more times. But how many times will a GM have to negoitate with a particular AGENT? Depending on how good the agent is and how large his stabel is at least every 2-3 years. More to the point Sports Agents are a small tight group. If one farts every one else knows what he had for brekfast in minuets.
Once Bonzi's agent proved himself to be unreasonable and GP had made his final offer GP HAD to back that up. The ONLY way to back up this is my final offer is walk away from the table and that also means imediatly finding the best replacement situation in your price range. (the Salmons contract size is a differnt issue all together)
A few things are acomplished here. First, next time arround THIS agent will understand what final offer means and will KNOW not to play games with GP. Second every other agent learns the same lesson. But for this lesson to have ANY teeth in it GP can not give in at all. So unless Bonzi fires his agent and APROACHES the Kings with a deal OR if Bonzi's current agent calls GP OFFERING Bonzi at vet minium for one year (effectively saying I know I blew it and I learend my lesson) there can be no talkes with Bonzi.
Sad, and maybe not even Bonzi's fault directly but thats the way it has to be for GP to be ABLE to make any decent deals in the future. This is COMPLEETLY about Geof's crediblity. Salmons was just the right guy in the right place at the right time. I wish him well.
Salmons isn't really a scrub. He's a decent player. There is a reason why two of the better GM's in the league were chasing after him.
Granted he's not worth that contract, that said...he's still solid..and can provide play at PG, SG, and SF.
well depends on how long your view is. Thsi year? Kings lose a good player that wanted a huge contract likely to extend past his usefullness... small loss Kings. Bonzi's Agent looses a BIG deal with no safe harbor... BIG Loss, Bonzi has to put off signing a big deal for at least one season, BIG loss. In the next few seasons Kings have a guy that was actively persued by other teams but we have to see how he does to call it a bust, a fair deal or a good deal, Bonzi's agent has lost lots of crediblity and new prospcts will hard to sign... BIGER loss, Bonzi may or may not get a better offer next season. In the Long run GP brings this back story with him to every negotiation and is much more liekly to make better deals due to the rep of crushing agents... HUGE Kings win, Bonzi's Agent may put this behind him or may be selling insurace in 2 years, just have to see. Bonzi will no doubt get a fair offer next season and in the end may loose out on a few million dollars off of a life time earnings in the tens of millions... some loss but not huge.But who's the winner?
Fortunatelly for Salmons, for GP it looked like a desperate move.
Truth.
You know, Charlotte is still quite a ways under the minimum salary level and I doubt they'd want Bonzi. But maybe they'd like Corliss? Then sign Bonzi, maybe to a three year deal?
No one is the winner.well depends on how long your view is. Thsi year? Kings lose a good player that wanted a huge contract likely to extend past his usefullness... small loss Kings. Bonzi's Agent looses a BIG deal with no safe harbor... BIG Loss, Bonzi has to put off signing a big deal for at least one season, BIG loss. In the next few seasons Kings have a guy that was actively persued by other teams but we have to see how he does to call it a bust, a fair deal or a good deal, Bonzi's agent has lost lots of crediblity and new prospcts will hard to sign... BIGER loss, Bonzi may or may not get a better offer next season. In the Long run GP brings this back story with him to every negotiation and is much more liekly to make better deals due to the rep of crushing agents... HUGE Kings win, Bonzi's Agent may put this behind him or may be selling insurace in 2 years, just have to see. Bonzi will no doubt get a fair offer next season and in the end may loose out on a few million dollars off of a life time earnings in the tens of millions... some loss but not huge.
Then I hate the person who's bright idea it was to sign Salmons. Just becuase Bonzi screwed up dosen't mean we had to sign a scrub to the full MLE.
And now, GP, is playing hardball to drive down the price. I sincerely hope this is the case because we're a better team with Bonzi, especially if it forces us to jettison some dead wood in the expiring contracts we're carrying this year.
sono said:It’s good to hear GP has cemented his credibility, but in the NBA market credibility alone won’t bring you decent players, especially when you dealing with agents such us Bonzi’s.
I doubt it.
He made his last best offer and Phillips turned it down. Petrie is done. He's not looking back. Was it the right move? Maybe, maybe not. But it's a done deal.
It's like a rocky relationship. When you finally realize it's just not gonna work, you cut your losses and you move on. That's what Petrie has done.
As far as credibility not going far when dealing with agents like William Phillips, HIS credibility is the one that's shot right now, not Petrie's. Phillips had his client turn down a legitimate offer. If I'm a young player looking for an agent, am I going to pick someone like Phillips or am I gonna look at the guy who, for example, got Peja mega-millions from the Hornets?
Hrm... Let me think...
![]()
Yeah, I think it is time to get over this. I am sure that Phillips will desperately come up with a few more scenario's and GP will hear from him again but unless he is better at his job than he has demonstrated, they will not be worth our time.I would have love to have Bonzi back, but I am really starting to get excited about seeing Francisco and Kevin get some big opprotunities.
That's obvious, but I'm not talking about his (Phillips) credibility or care about.....
As far as credibility not going far when dealing with agents like William Phillips, HIS credibility is the one that's shot right now, not Petrie's. Phillips had his client turn down a legitimate offer. If I'm a young player looking for an agent, am I going to pick someone like Phillips or am I gonna look at the guy who, for example, got Peja mega-millions from the Hornets?
Hrm... Let me think...
![]()
Bottom line, if Bonzi would sign a 1 year deal for the minimum. The Kings would be stupid to not sign him. Pay the 1 million in tax, who gives a ****. But I don't know if I like the idea of giving our expirings away. Plus the Francisco/Kevin thing.
Given your connections, VF-21, I find it pretty depressing that a fluid situation, such as contract negotiations, will be summarily rejected just because of what has taken place prior. Bonzi/his agent may need a cup hung from their rear ends to keep if from flowing over but I think most people, including GP initially, feel that we're a better club with Bonzi than without him so isn't that a little bit like cutting of your nose to spite your face? Surely a short term contract at a reasonalble price would make this a better team, don't you think?
That's obvious, but I'm not talking about his (Phillips) credibility or care about.
Contract negotations may be fluid for a while, but then - just like everything else - decisions have to be made. Petrie and Phillips reached a point, I think, where future discussions were pointless because they were not going to see eye-to-eye on Bonzi's sticker price.
Petrie moved on. Phillips fully intended to find the greener pastures. It was most likely a big shock to him to find out there were NO other takers at the price his client wanted and expected to get.
Bottom line, if Bonzi would sign a 1 year deal for the minimum. The Kings would be stupid to not sign him. Pay the 1 million in tax, who gives a ****. But I don't know if I like the idea of giving our expirings away. Plus the Francisco/Kevin thing.
I know it really sucks....I sure hope Salmons proves us all wrong and is a super stud multi position player to warrant his contract. It really also sucks that I cannot remember seeing or hearing about this guy and now he is supposed to be this great multi position player that we paid $25.5M/5 years on??? It is great having a player with versatility to play multiple positions, but then we need to trim the roster on the backup overlap of that player. We cannot be 4 deep at PG (Bibby, Salmons, Hart, Price, ???Douby who we are said to be grooming for PG???). Garcia then would be our backup to Artest and Salmons after that I think? I rather have Bonzi as backup SF after Artest and then have him starting or backing up SG. Maybe he is humble enough to accept a backup position behind Artest and start occasionally at SG, but with now having Salmons that seems like a very distant possibility and awful redundant.![]()
If we could send Corliss, Potapenko or Hart to a team under the cap and resign Bonzi to a reasonable contract... It would be the first good move this summer.
I don't think anything was summarily rejected except for the Kings offer to Bonzi.
Contract negotations may be fluid for a while, but then - just like everything else - decisions have to be made. Petrie and Phillips reached a point, I think, where future discussions were pointless because they were not going to see eye-to-eye on Bonzi's sticker price.
Petrie moved on. Phillips fully intended to find the greener pastures. It was most likely a big shock to him to find out there were NO other takers at the price his client wanted and expected to get.
Bonzi could have accepted the offer Petrie made. If he had, especially considering how much talk he had done about wanting to remain a King, etc. then we wouldn't be having this discussion.
I don't get insider info. about inner workings of contract stuff. In fact, I don't think anyone knows the inner workings of Petrie's negotiations until and unless he decides to reveal them. And we all know what a jabbermouth Petrie is.
There were indications in a couple of different places that there were provisions in the contract Bonzi objected to. I don't recall right now, but I think William Phillips may even have mentioned that as a reason Bonzi didn't agree to the deal. My gut instinct tells me that perhaps there is more here than we will ever know. Not all dirty linen gets aired...
What I do know is that the USS Bonzi King sailed. It hit a reef and sank with the loss of all hands. There are NO plans to attempt to salvage it.
Now, this was funny but true.This is like breaking up with your girlfriend to test the waters and then realizing that nobody else wants to date you so you show up at her door like Ike Turner with some flowers saying "I'm sorry Baby!"