D-Mass
Starter
The only teams who wanted him were Phoenix and Toronto
Kings Have Signed John Salmons - Bye, Bye Bonzi!!
- Thread starter Purple Reign
- Start date
The only teams who wanted him were Phoenix and Toronto
John Salmons. As I remember, he is a somewhat versatile SF, without decent jumpers. With Artest and Garcia.... Please somebody tell me what's going on.
I'm somewhat disappointed that Wells will just walk out.
I'm EXTREAMLY disappointed that we will get another swingman!
Geeez. We've waited so long, and this is the result?
Anyway, bye bye Bonzi. Thanks for the great memory.
I'm somewhat disappointed that Wells will just walk out.
I'm EXTREAMLY disappointed that we will get another swingman!
Geeez. We've waited so long, and this is the result?
Anyway, bye bye Bonzi. Thanks for the great memory.
Viking
Starter
Thing is he turned down a huge contract in toronto so we'll probably also pay out the $%$ for him nonetheless... and oh yeah. He's ANOTHER MEDIOCRE FORWARD that we don't need.
JJ22L
Starter
I hate to admit it- but in a sick twisted way that made me laugh
Viking
Starter
if we pay him anything near the amount of money Toronto was offering - yes
especially since we don't need him and he helps us in no way. (Salmons)
The FULL mid-level???
hoops4kings
Bench
That's what Petrie said.
Bricklayer
Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Thing is, we just used up the money that would have gone to Bonzi, whether in a sign or trade or not. If we sign and trade Bonzi now we end up over the tax threshhold.
The $$ now become a huge concern. Signing John Salmons is just...whatever. Signing him for 5yrs at the MLE or whatever is insane.
Bonzi is gone. We are not going to sign and trade him. He's a part of Kings history. Period.
SacKings384
Starter
The ENTIRE MLE? ON JOHN F'ING SALMONS! JOHN SALMONS! FOR JOHN... SALMONS!!! Geoff you really ****ed this one up big time. And for all those thinking this would lead to a trade 1.Why would Salmons nix a deal to Toronto just so he could sign with the Kings and get traded? 2.Who the hell wants John FRICKIN Salmons for the entire MLE?
JJ22L
Starter
...please God let there be a method to Petries madness. A gold liner? No? We signed Salmons for the FULL MLE, what? We need a big not another tweener forward that cant rebound? GAWD...why dont we just call ourselves the Sacramento 76ersfodderaccepters.
Petrie..asdklf;jaskdlfj<---Thats how i feel about this. (If my opinion even mattered)
Petrie..asdklf;jaskdlfj<---Thats how i feel about this. (If my opinion even mattered)
Sac.Kings
All-Star
Viking
Starter
AleksandarN
Starter
But if you really think about it Jamal's contract expires next year.
hoops4kings
Bench
Can't wait to hear the happy callers on KHTK 1140. LOL!
LPKingsFan
All-Star
It gets worse. Mike actually called Petrie out about the rebounding concerns, and what Petrie had to say makes me feel slightly ill.
He claimed that we need to get better "as a team." And that maybe we would make another move "down the road" if things get bad. That doesn't sound good. He said the Kings will be worse in rebounding but better in "other areas." I wonder if he really gets it???
He claimed that we need to get better "as a team." And that maybe we would make another move "down the road" if things get bad. That doesn't sound good. He said the Kings will be worse in rebounding but better in "other areas." I wonder if he really gets it???
JJ22L
Starter
petrie no longer deserves to have his name capitalized
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
