starks said:hey, brick is there any chance to get elton brand let's say for peja and williamson or via any other trade?...what do you think?
Bricklayer said:I don't think there's any consensus about much of anything in the offseason among Kingsfans at this point, except that the majority anticipate significant changes. Could Kenny get traded as part of those changes? Sure. But could he be back? Also quite possible. Its hard to imagine us not wanting to get bigger and stonger inside, in particular after the way we've been beaten up in there in this playoff series. But that's an argument for replacing Kenny as a starter, not necessarily for trading him. His big long term contract may make him hard to keep unless he's a starter though, or at least a 6th man.
We could:
1) trade him straight up for another player (unlikely)
2) package him with other players in a major trade (very possible)
3) trade him in a salary dump to a team with cap room and in need of a starting PF (very unlikely)
4) bring him back as a starter at PF (possible but problematic)
5) get a new starter at PF, and bring him back as a backup (possible, but has a big contract for a bencher and is mostly a PF, so maybe not)
6) try to switch him to SF if we trade Peja (unlikely, but interesting)
It all depends on what other moves we make, and literally anything seems possible this offseason. No idea what the team will look like next year.
.I don't think any of this warrant being pulled out of this or any starting line-upor in lue of comming off the bench not sure why anyone wants to reduce production. I quess thats why Im asking I think there are several teams in the NBA that would not have an issue with his contract if this is what they are getting. Except wolves, spurs well you know teams with dominate PF's
Bricklayer said:Look, if you wanted to start another KT is great thread, just title it that way so it can be given the attention it deserves.
As it is, you asked a question and people gave you answers. KTs height isn't a myth. Our complete lack of interior defense isn't one either. KT can put up respectable numbers on most nights. But do they lead to victory? Does he help us where we are weak? Can we be a serious contender and beat Duncan, Amare and Dirk matching them with KT? And while I used question marks, the answers to all of those questions is "no". What we do with KT in the offseason is educated by that "no", but not solely determined by it.
Kingsgurl said:.
But Kenny doesn't play out there by himself. It's a TEAM game, and it really depends on a couple of things. What is Petries new vision for this team down the road? Does Kenny fit into those plans, in Petries eyes, or is he a means to acquire someone who does? The big spin on the trade was breaking Chris' contract down into smaller, more easily traded pieces. Now, that's not to say that Kenny has to be the one to go, I just happen to think that, if the deal is right, anyone could be, including Kenny.
A championship can be won with out a Super Star Power Forward, just need a Super Star somewere else on the floor don't have to play the PF position.
patrick204 said:I would try Kenny at small forward tonight. Put Peja at Guard (where he usually plays for Serbia, and where he could give Allen some trouble shooting over). Greg at center ending the Jerome James superstar experience, Brad at PF, Mike at PG if he promises to play with some brains.
If everybody plays with energy, the Kings win 100-80, and the Sonics have no answers in Game 6 or 7 either.
Pqster said:Or maybe they will take into account that during the season if you take Jim O' Brian out of the picture he averages a double/double again this year which is a legitimate argument if you take into account last year and this year with the Kings numbers.
Or maybe they will look at as the Kings got beat up in the playoffs Kt held his 2 oponents to:
Evans: Regular season 9.5 reb, 5 pts - Playoffs 8 reb, 3 points
Radmonovic: Regular season 5 reb, 12 pts - Playoffs 3.5 reb, 6.5 points
Or maybe they will see that KT averaged 12.4 points and 7.3 rebounds to 13.3 points and almost 10 rebounds per game in the playoffs.
I'm not so sure he is getting beat-up in the playoffs.
And I guess the biggest question is how did he do all this being under sized and weak in the paint.
I don't think any of this warrant being pulled out of this or any starting line-upor in lue of comming off the bench not sure why anyone wants to reduce production. I quess thats why Im asking I think there are several teams in the NBA that would not have an issue with his contract if this is what they are getting. Except wolves, spurs well you know teams with dominate PF's. I think if you have a shot at one of those then it makes a lot of sense. but guys like boozer and those types Kt gives you everything they can do exept he does it closer to the ground. It's hard to explain cause NBA money does not always seem real but by NBA standards, his contract is good all day.
Bricklayer said:why you asking me?![]()
Bricklayer said:why you asking me?![]()
GoGoGadget said:If that's what you wanted to say, say it in the first post.
This new "fad" of starting threads with a question for the sheer purpose of arguing everyone's answers is really quite tiresome.
Pqster said:Other than KG who else can compete with those monsters? Like I said if you can get that player then you gotta do it, but im not sure who is available I think you need to get the best PF you can for the money off set their numbers as much as possible and use one of your other positions to gain ground. As good as Amare, Duncan and Dirk are they are only one of 5. Everyone in the league wants those guys but only a few teams have them. Even that becomes an issue look at the numbers they put up against each other! A championship can be won with out a Super Star Power Forward, just need a Super Star somewere else on the floor don't have to play the PF position.
NewEraKings05 said:I hear this kid might be looking for a new home.
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/lebron_james/index.html