I heard Memphis is trying to Trade Thabeet

#31
Jaric is playing in Spain. His cotract was bought out by Memphis so you cannot include him in any trades.

In response to the opening post, I would absolutely be for this trade. It will take 2-3 years for Thabeet to develop but I am willing to wait for a 7'2 athletic shotblocking giant to come around. He has the potential to be the next Dikembe Mutambo and I would be perfectly fine with that thanks.
That's kind of a stretch...
 
#32
It has to be frustrating to look at all the productive rookies picked after them, but I find it really hard to believe the Grizz are anywhere near the point of dumping him on the cheap.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#34
somebody on here had created a deal where we swapped Kevin and..Noc maybe? Or Thomas? For Iggy and Dalembert.

Swing Dalembert to Memphis instead, send Thabeet and Steven Hunter our way. Would come close to matching salary wise. Hunter is an ender. Memphis gets its veteran defender. We get Iggy and Thabeet.
 
#35
Aren't we talking about the same team/GM that traded Pau Gasol for a mound of dirt?

Nothing is off the table......
 
Last edited:
#37
That was the popular perception of the trade immediately after it went down but if you consider Marc Gasol a "mound of dirt" then thats a bit surprising.

With all due respect that trade had NOTHING to due with Marc Gasol he was an after thought at best..... I suppose it does mitigate some of the damage done with the fan base. It was a ludicrous salary dump!
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
#38
With all due respect that trade had NOTHING to due with Marc Gasol he was an after thought at best..... I suppose it does mitigate some of the damage done with the fan base. It was a ludicrous salary dump!
To call it a salary dump would be an overstatement. I don't think Memphis management was that smart
 
#39
Um, he was an absolutely dominant defender in college, and the only people who thought otherwise where fools who only watched 2 or 3 cherry picked games to discover that he would not be a good matchup against Al Harrington or somebody. It is possible I suppose that all the college coaches he played against got it wrong while voting him 2x College DPOY, but I doubt it.

Whether he will be in the pros is yet to be seen, but he's already shown the shotblocking translates, and there's no sign the rebounding is going to be a big issue. Love to see what Westphal would do with such a raw potential weapon. He's found uses for anything and everything in the tool shed this season. And Thabeet would fit right in with the youth on this team.
riiiiiiight..... I have seen a TON of his games and it seemed like when he went against prospects he would get dominated.. He is a good shotblocker, yes.. Probably because he's 7'3 and athletic.. But a good defender? no.. I can't believe people are still arguing for this waste of a pick. He put up defensive stats but whenever he went against anyone good he stunk it up.. If you don't believe me then look it up. Go watch a few of the notable games.. Then come back and tell me the same thing. College defensive player of the year was awarded to a guy that can't play a lick of D outside of blocking shots. It's happened before.

edit: forgot you liked the guy.. ouch..

My opinion... The dude sucks, and will continue to suck. Do I want him on the Kings? Helllllllll no.
 
Last edited:
#40
Yeah at some point you have to ask yourself if its your eyes deceiving that are deceiving you. The college numbers say he was good, he was the best player on a Final 4 team, he won DPOY, he was co-Big East Player of the Year.

Maybe he's looked out of place this year...but that was really to be expected. Mutombo was gangly and his game looked ugly, but he still racked up DPOY after DPOY. I doubt Thabeet can be that good, but he's playing well this year and Memphis is playing well with him on the court.
Sorry man.. Those DPOY awards I kind of laughed off. I watched his game pretty closely in college because this board had been talking about him for a couple years.. He's just not that good man.

If he was a starter in the NBA I would suspect he would give us a 7'3 version of a Justin Williams type game without the rebounds. Maybe 6ppg 5rpg and 2bpg max as a 30mpg starter. He's weak, bites on fakes, no kind of offense whatsoever, creates too much tickytack contact WHILE getting pushed around, not a very good rebounder for his size.... I could go on.. IF we did trade for the guy it will be a few years before we even get a glimpse of his type of game. It's not something I am willing to sit through. I can imagine what this board will say about the guy if he came to Sac. He's not going to give you anything more than an extra body right now.. We already have one of those in Hilton Armstrong.. Another crap player that people wanted here.
 
#42
The stats are deceiving. He isn't a very good defender and he has already shown us this in college. People said because it was because he was playing against smaller and faster opponents, well here he is in the NBA and the same is happening. He's just not very good, and I don't want him playing for the kings.
Are you making that up? Perhaps you are confusing him with another player.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#43
Sorry man.. Those DPOY awards I kind of laughed off. I watched his game pretty closely in college because this board had been talking about him for a couple years.. He's just not that good man.

If he was a starter in the NBA I would suspect he would give us a 7'3 version of a Justin Williams type game without the rebounds. Maybe 6ppg 5rpg and 2bpg max as a 30mpg starter. He's weak, bites on fakes, no kind of offense whatsoever, creates too much tickytack contact WHILE getting pushed around, not a very good rebounder for his size.... I could go on.. IF we did trade for the guy it will be a few years before we even get a glimpse of his type of game. It's not something I am willing to sit through. I can imagine what this board will say about the guy if he came to Sac. He's not going to give you anything more than an extra body right now.. We already have one of those in Hilton Armstrong.. Another crap player that people wanted here.
The numbers say closer to 9 and 9 and 3 in 30minutes. But hey, don't let that slow you down. If the coaches he was playing against just voted him DPOY tiwce because they didn't realize his patheticness, I can't expect per minute stats to have much effect.
 
#44
Thabeeth >> Hawes right now, sad to say

he barely gets minutes cuz of Zbo and Gasol..but he's been blocking shots and rebounding real well when given the chance

I agree @ bricklayer's assessment... the guy has a 15.5 PER. He needs seem time and looks lost/confused at times but he already has shown that he can rebound/block shots @ an NBA level..
 
#46
The numbers say closer to 9 and 9 and 3 in 30minutes. But hey, don't let that slow you down. If the coaches he was playing against just voted him DPOY tiwce because they didn't realize his patheticness, I can't expect per minute stats to have much effect.
I was hoping they would overlook the stats vs. weak opponents when voting for dpoy. Meh.. It was the whole Hilton Armstrong for me all over again except this guy is 7'3, and imo didn't play as good of D in college as Armstrong did.. I still don't think he's a good man defender. Weak side, and help he does well enough but man on man he gets abused.
 
#48
I would love to make a trade for Thabeet, but man, looking at that roster. We cant really do much for them. They dont have any bad contracts.

The best I could come up with is:

Sacramento Sends
Kevin Martin
Hilton Armstrong

To The Grizzlies For
Hasheem Thabeet (2 years )
Steven Hunter ( Expiring )
Hamad Haddadi ( 2 years )

Why for the Kings
Two young bigs with potential (Thabeet and Haddadi) and an expiring. More big bodies to push Hawes and JT. If Thabeet developes into something than were set at that spot for years. If not, we've traded Kmart for a salary dump.

why for the Grizz
Kevin Martin gives them a huge scorer to add to the bench. And if they lose Gay in free agency at least they have something. Armstrong might even give them a little defense ( its been noted thats what there looking for )
The best trade proposal I think.

I think it is a fair exchange for getting us out of the expensive contract of a weak, non-defending, pure scorer ( Martin ), and another big ( Armstrong ) who is no better than our current bigs.

Thabeet and Haddadi - both are very promising young centers who can lit Hawes' butt. Maybe Hawes will play like a man if he knows his over-hyped time is near its end. Or maybe, we could use him as a power forward at times? Maybe he could be better at 4 like Pau Gasol? Who knows? ;)

And wow. We'll have 3 seven-footers ( Thabeet, Haddadi, Hawes ), and 2 6' 11" guys ( Thompson and Greene ) rotating at the 4 and 5. Now, the Lakers better watch out when Westphal is done developing and figuring out how to best use his bigs. :D

I think if we can get Thabeet and Haddadi, I can fairly say the rebuild is over. We just have to polish the talents we have.
 
#49
riiiiiiight..... I have seen a TON of his games and it seemed like when he went against prospects he would get dominated.. He is a good shotblocker, yes.. Probably because he's 7'3 and athletic.. But a good defender? no.. I can't believe people are still arguing for this waste of a pick. He put up defensive stats but whenever he went against anyone good he stunk it up.. If you don't believe me then look it up. Go watch a few of the notable games.. Then come back and tell me the same thing. College defensive player of the year was awarded to a guy that can't play a lick of D outside of blocking shots. It's happened before.

edit: forgot you liked the guy.. ouch..

My opinion... The dude sucks, and will continue to suck. Do I want him on the Kings? Helllllllll no.
Sometimes I wonder if some posters here are really knowledgeable about basketball, or just pretending to be smarter than all those professional coaches and talent scouts.:p

It just doesn't make sense to say that a player is not a good defender when one had surrendered to the fact that he is a good shot blocker. And include the fact that he was voted twice as DPOY by no less than the professional coaches in college, how can anyone still insists that Thabeet is not a good defender? :rolleyes:

Now, please list some names of young promising centers who have better resume than Thabeet in College and tell us if it is probable to acquire them.

Are people in this board saying they had coached in College, or has done anything relevant in basketball more than those coaches? :eek:
 
#50
call me crazy, but Thabeet is special...you get get many people with that size/mobility/rebounding/shotblocking ability..


I do it:

Kings send: Omri Casspi, Hilton Armstrong

Grizz send: hasheem thabeet

this makes sense all around...

Grizz gets the young scorer/energy guy they've been looking for...

Thabeet's not a "bust" if you go back to the draft threads..it was generally agreed that he needed 2/3 years...
 
Last edited:
#51
Sometimes I wonder if some posters here are really knowledgeable about basketball, or just pretending to be smarter than all those professional coaches and talent scouts.:p

It just doesn't make sense to say that a player is not a good defender when one had surrendered to the fact that he is a good shot blocker. And include the fact that he was voted twice as DPOY by no less than the professional coaches in college, how can anyone still insists that Thabeet is not a good defender? :rolleyes:

Now, please list some names of young promising centers who have better resume than Thabeet in College and tell us if it is probable to acquire them.

Are people in this board saying they had coached in College, or has done anything relevant in basketball more than those coaches? :eek:
A ton of the college community laughed off the dpoy awards for Thabeet.. Go check out the archives on the UCONN forums as well. Not sure if we are allowed to link other forums, but you can google it.. There were more deserving players in line for that award.

I am not sure if anyone even fits your criteria being as I have only heard rumors about Thabeet. Actually there were some about Hibbert a while back which I would take over Thabeet in a heartbeat... Hrmm... That's the only ones that were really mentioned so far this year to my recollection. I would take DeAndre Jordan too but not sure if his name has come up much.

Others I would take if available are Blair, Love, Mullens (this would make a good debate), Robin and Brook Lopez, and Speights.... These are just names off the top of my head. I am sure I am missing some. But I would definitely take any of the above over Thabeet. I'm telling you all.. He's minimum 3-4 years from even contributing if ever. No reason to even take a chance on him now.

He's not the droid you are looking for.
 
#52
Basically just trying to say I don't think we should give up a big trade piece when there are plenty of bigs in the upcoming draft.. Thabeet isn't the answer.. Thabeet will be a bust.
 
#53
A beauty of a player like Thabeet is that he will never be understood in stats alone.

He brings elements to the game that do not go on the stat sheet. Players that might go in for an uncontested layup will change their minds. Players will attempt shots that are altered by Thabeet. Not blocked; but the shooting angle will be forced to change and there will be more misses. Perhaps stats that might be reflective are 'points in the paint' and opponents' shooting percentage.

Even though Thabeet has tons to work on, and years from now may turn out to be a disappointing #2 pick, he still is the kind of young player that we desperately need, and the kind of player that Petrie should be looking for.
 
#54
UConn was top defensive team in the country, not just big east. It's reasonable to make clearly better defensive player of such a team DPOY.
 
#56
Just read this on Espn Insider that they may be trying to trade off Thabeet because he doesn't fit where their going. I mean they already have Randolph and Gasol. I would love to see him come to the Kings. What do you guys think? Hes average 10.8 minutes 3.1 boards and 1.2 blocks a game. think about when he develops for a year and we give him 30+ minutes.
They drafted him knowing he was a long term project. Why on earth would they want to deal him? Doing so will not only abandon their investment in his development, but his stock is low right now and they wouldn't get anybody worth much in return.
 
#57
I don't know Thabeet's game well enough to know if we want him or not. My main concern is that we already have a center that needs a few years to develop. We need a strong, experianced center right now.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#58
I've been without power for three days here in Ensenada, and when I come back I think I'm reliving the days up until the draft. So here's my two cents. I've probably seen Thabeet play at least 40 times in college. I said before the draft and I will stick to that assessment that he's not ready for the NBA. That he will be a long term project. For every good thing he does on defense, he will do something equally stupid on offense, and sometimes on defense. He is constantly out of position. He's not a good rebounder in the sense that he uses proper technique, but only in the sense that he's taller than everyone else. In other words, he gets all the balls that happen to bounce his way. He wasn't in college, and still isn't a good man on man defender. I saw him get beat by guys that were 5 or 6 inches shorter than him.

Right now he's a three second violation waiting to happen. In college he played goalie. He can't do that in the NBA. Even our own Hawes made him look bad by pulling him out away from the basket and then when he commited, he simply put the ball on the floor and went by him.

Now, having said all that. I think he has talent. It will take a couple of years to put it all together, but if he's dedicated he can become a pretty good player. I have no clue how dedicated he is, but if he is, I would love to take a flyer on him. But only if I can get him at a very reasonable price. And that price doesn't include Martin or Greene or any of our core players, developed or not. He was simply drafted too high. Thats not his fault, but they're not going to get 2 pick of the draft quality back for him. He's not worth it.

For those that don't have the patience to stick with Thompson or Hawes, your in for a longer wait with Thabeet..
 
#59
For those that don't have the patience to stick with Thompson or Hawes, your in for a longer wait with Thabeet..
exactly my thought when i read all these people who want thabeet. people cant wait for hawes or jt to develop...cant even wait a couple months for evans and martin to mesh are ready to trade for thabeet, a project who everyone knows will take time to develop. :confused:
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#60
exactly my thought when i read all these people who want thabeet. people cant wait for hawes or jt to develop...cant even wait a couple months for evans and martin to mesh are ready to trade for thabeet, a project who everyone knows will take time to develop. :confused:

A project who is already "developed" enough to fill our biggest need. He blocks more shots in 10 minutes a night than any of our losers do in 30.

And waiting for things to develop is not a problem at this point as long as that enthusiasm is there on the team. In fact right now we are being scuttled by our ALREADY developed players. It is precisely the kids, and their potential which had excitemnt building. Adding another high upside guy, and one that does precisely what Westphal has been looking for our guys to do all season, is a flat out win. You get all your holes plugged wiht young talent you can actually at a certain point just sit back and wait, knowing that time is on your side and in a few years you are gong to be dangerous.