at this point in dwight howard's career, there is definite reason for pause. he's got a penchant for petulance, and likes to point fingers before first considering how he himself might be the problem, might improve on his deficiencies. he says he wants to lead a team to a championship, yet he shrinks away from the responsibilities that come with the territory of leadership. he may not be as demonstrative as our own demarcus cousins, but he does suffer from many of the same issues of immaturity. howard has an unnerving need to be liked, and it causes him to hedge his bets, both with the media and on the court. playing with kobe bryant has only provided further contrast. on the one hand, kobe bryant does not give a **** what anybody thinks. he just gets results. without him, the lakers floundered in the playoffs. then there's dwight, who cares far too much what everyone thinks, and is unable to lift a team on his back when they need him most...
then there's the fact that howard had the gall to proclaim himself superman--a nickname previously owned by shaq--long before establishing himself as a dominant force on the offensive side of the ball. he remains mostly reliant on his fading athleticism to score, and still hasn't fully developed the footwork necessary to become a true back-to-the-basket center. demarcus is already further along, in that respect. of course, howard has always had a feel for weakside shot-blocking. when he's at 100%, he's a rim protector of the highest order, but he's never taken that next step to legendary status, the step that shaq was able to take much earlier on in his career. it's confounding as an nba fan, to watch dwight howard flirt with greatness but fail to grasp it time and again. not to mention bigs take a lot of punishment down low (particularly given the hack-a-howard strategy), and i'd be seriously concerned about how dwight's back will hold up as he ages, as his athleticism continues to dissipate...
if you're a gm, you must do the diligence, and give dwight howard a fair look in free agency. i mean, his ability to change the entire course of a game from the defensive side of the ball is so very tempting, especially given the kings' well-chronicled deficiencies on defense. but, considering what it would cost to lock him up long-term (with no guarantee that he wouldn't just abandon ship like he did with orlando, and like he would be doing with LA if he theoretically signed with the kings or anybody else), i'd be more inclined to pass, and invest my energy in demarcus cousins, who has a tremendous ceiling, and the kind of fiery competitive streak that dwight has always lacked...