Sure we do. Sure everyone does. Self loathing Kings fans aside, there is a reason everyone from fans to media to coaches and GMs across the nation was taking note, and a reason why the condemnation has been so universal. If you know the game, you could see precisely what was going on here.
And here I'll spell it out. It was absolutely 100% a classic, boring, humdrum, NBA 1.0 tale. You got a young superstar, you designed a system around the young superstar's talents, you get a hard driving young coach preaching defense, you start competing, then you start winning. you drop a few out of inexperience, later in the year you won't so much. If you make the playoffs you'll probably get knocked out early by a more veteran experienced crew. But those are all lumps you need to take. You'll scrap and hang in the race until late in the season. People will talk about you, your national games will double next year, and the chatter will be how you're just one player, or a little experience, etc. away from being dangerous. In short it was a classic opening to a young team on its way.
Perhaps the cherry on top of the pathetic front office delusion is this: the one thing we were lacking? Talent. This was a solid, professional, well coached group out working and out grinding its opponents, but in the end, not wildly talented. Not setting the league on fire. Just a group with a big star learning to be tough minded and competitive. And then the dips in the suits not only ruined it, but they ruined it under the most idiotic delusion of all: that what we were was a wildly talented group that was poorly coached. I mean, I have nothing but raging contempt for the basketball acumen, or complete lack thereof, that could come to such a conclusion. That's pathetic.
what cracks me up about the new regime is just how little they seem to understand about what fans actually care about. it
never matters how boring or humdrum a team may be
when they're winning; games sell out, merchandise gets bought, the league takes notice, the media writes flattering puff pieces, the players and the coaches
earn respect, and all of that represents a crucial element that appears to have gone overlooked in nba 3.0: inertia...
the kings were building
forward momentum, the fans were starting to flock back to arco, opposing coaches were heaping praise on the kings (and on mike malone, specifically), national media members were preparing their "surprise team of the season" articles, and the kings were earning respect for their tough-mindedness. then vivek/PDA/mullin pulled the rug from underneath
their own franchise's inertia. they destroyed
their own forward momentum. now the fans are retreating from arco once again, opposing coaches are shaking their heads, whatever respect the players had earned has begun to wane, and national media members have returned to existing narratives about how terrible the kings are managed. i mean, i know that kings fans love a good ole inferiority complex, but personally, i was really hoping that #sacramentoproud could ring true
on the court for the first time in a decade. from the moment vivek ranadive purchased the sacramento kings, he preached culture change as the chief priority, and he was
certain that michael malone was the man for that particular job. then, just as the seed of a
winning culture was beginning to take root during a promising start to malone's
second year on the job, vivek decided that... there was nowhere for malone to go but down? i don't understand it; i'll probably
never understand it...
oh, and for the record, a "winning culture" doesn't have to equate to a winning record, particularly in a brutally tough western conference. a "winning culture" is one in which a
team acts like a
team, even when the ball sticks or when it gets turned over in excess. a "winning culture" is one in which the players have the coach's back, and likewise the coach has his players' backs. a "winning culture" is one in which the defensive side of the ball is valued at least as highly as the offensive side of the ball. and, perhaps most importantly, a "winning culture" is one in which a team
believes it can beat anyone on any given night. it wouldn't have mattered to me if the kings couldn't manage to finish at .500 this season under mike malone; establishing a
winning culture was paramount, both for the sake of making a legitimate run at the playoffs by the time the new arena opens, and for the sake of attempting to justify all of that completely unearned loyalty that demarcus cousins has placed in this franchise...