Barnes has actually had a net positive impact on winning basketball teams, here and elsewhere. He provided invaluable leadership for a team that was in sore need of it and was frequently a steadying force during the regular season, when the moment got too big for the young Kings. Even today, before the game got completely out of hand, he got involved and made positive things happen on the offensive end, and tried to keep the ship afloat when the rest of the team came out flat-footed. That's not an "ancillary piece" in my personal record book. Thompson, by comparison, provided none of those things, but his only real sin was being just a little bit better than all the stiffs they tried to replace him with. They both played forward for the Kings, and that's pretty much where the similarities end. No need to even invoke his name.
No. Absolutely not. No disrespect to Richaun Holmes, but his contributions and Harrison Barnes' contributions to the Kings are not comparable.