[Game] Game 62: Sacramento Kings @ Atlanta Hawks, 3/9/15 - 4:30 pdt, 7:30 edt

Ben has got to focus more on his defensive assignment! That Hawks possession earlier in the quarter Ben just totally forgot he was guarding the best 3pt shooter in NBA history lol
 
Can't hit a shot and leaves Kyle korver wide open... Goes under a screen on Kyle korver.

This is why I can't get on board with Ben
 
Don't worry guys, remember we get extra points for losing if it's fast paced.

Wait, no? That's not how it works?

But we have data points.

Shoot. Um...

NEW ARENA COMING SOON!!!
 
Can't hit a shot and leaves Kyle korver wide open... Goes under a screen on Kyle korver.

This is why I can't get on board with Ben

At this point, he still struggles with team d. He's got the physical skills and defends man to man well so I'm looking forward to seeing what some stability in coaching can do for him.
 
Can't get nasty if you can't get the ball in the post. They front cuz and double him instantly daring us to take shots.

They zoned up out of a time out too. The book is out. This team cannot shot and is reliant on one man.
 
At this point, he still struggles with team d. He's got the physical skills and defends man to man well so I'm looking forward to seeing what some stability in coaching can do for him.

I don't think he defends well personally. Has he improved? Yeah a bit but as tonight proves he can actually lose you a game on his own in 3 minutes by checking out mentally then being unable to handle the ball at the other end.
 
Ok as abysmal as this has been, seeing JT go for a ride on Mike Scott made me lol. State of being a Kings fan.
 
Can't be much longer until Jerry and Grant start talking about anything but the game, corny Indiana hillbilly jokes from Jerry, etc.
 
The what-ifs will be and are so big. I try not to think about it though

I can't think of very many Kings fans who are wasting any time at all playing "what if" over Mike Malone. Seriously.

It's over and done and we've moved on.
 
I can't think of very many Kings fans who are wasting any time at all playing "what if" over Mike Malone. Seriously.

It's over and done and we've moved on.
I'm not saying we'll mull over it; that's not my point -- the purpose was to say that a long relationship with Malone was a potentially stable identity that the Kings could have adopted for more than a decade.
 
I'm not saying we'll mull over it; that's not my point -- the purpose was to say that a long relationship with Malone was a potentially stable identity that the Kings could have adopted for more than a decade.

If you say so.
 
Back
Top