Draft Evans then maybe in 1yr trade Martin

#31
ok first of all. kmart is a top 10 scorer on the leagues worst team. second. he has to score 20+ppg because no one on the team can. third evans i think is going to be that pick that we shoulda woulda coulda picked but we didnt if we pass on him. kinda like arenas when we drafted gwallace instead.

i dont understand why you guys are knockin on evans, he can play the point as yu see in college, his team was better when he was at the 1. i think he's a rich mans rodney stucky, big pg, create his own shot, OWNs the dribble drive.
but i dont know we'll see. as for right now if rubio is off the board by the time #4 comes up, do doubt in my mind we should draft evans.

He played the ball handler in college, didn't show me any PG skills.
 
#32
Kevins way to talented to play as poorly as he does on defense. Its just pathetic! he clearly takes plays off on defense and that is disturbing...

He was a serious reason along with Beno for our teams inability to guard the 3pt shots from other teams! He isn't a leader! He is never going to be more than a one dimensional Odom type 3rd option. Odom does many different things well.

that said he is a great offensive player and an excellent shooter and also appears to be a good character guy even though he isn't a leader.

Kevin is one of the very few pieces we have that could rid us of our bad contracts, get us more future picks, along with a good player.
We haven't agreed on a few things lately, but you're 100% spot on with this one... Sure he HAS been our best player, but I have a feeling that is going to change this year with the maturation of our twin towers JT and Spence, and the addition of hopefully rubio or another good PG to free them up even more. more then a few teams could use his talents... I say we start listening...
 
#33
I will mention this again -- Kevin is borderline useless to us as we stand right now. He's soft, he's not a leader, he basically plays a selfish game in that he he takes a ton of shots and creates none and forces everyone else to cover for his defense. He WOULD definitely have a role on the right sort of elite team...if they could slap him around into playing some defense. But for us, right now, he's the best player on a 17 win team. He barely has a positve +/-. And he's not THAT young anymore at 26. If its going to take us 4 years to get back to top status you are beginning to have to look at his mileage.

None of the above mean he HAS to be traded, but it does mean that "oh no what would we do without Kevin!?!" is a joke in our current position. IF we can find a way to quickly recover here, if we can somehow accelerate this process and bring in talent ready to win within the next couple of years, then Kevin can be part of that and is an asset as pure points. But if you are talking about drafting 18 yr olds or 19 yr olds, by the time they are ready to matter Kevin is going to be sliding toward the latter half of his career. And with his injury problems and reliance on quickness, it could be a quicker slide than for many.

I'm not down with just any and all of the trade Kevin suggestions as many of them exceed my stomach for risk taking with one of our few assets. But Kevin is a much more valuable asset for a good team already in position to contend that simply needs a bit of offensive punch and that can cover the weaknesses that come with it than he is to a really young and bad team. He has to be on the table along with everything else.

I don't agree wit the Brick man that often but I really do have to side with him this time on Martin. Martin is a good scorer, but he doesn't seem to be much of a difference maker. He cannot bring his team back from a deficit nor be relied on to hit a game winner for you. The dude just kind of scores, and nothing much. If he scores a lot, great...if he doesn't, then you're in trouble.
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
#34
Back to Evans. He has great ability to get to the rim and finish that will draw help defense leading somebody open be it open 3pt, cutter, or one of the bigs getting an open dunk. His Defense is my biggest eye opener. he is quick enough to guard pgs and big enough to guard sgs and can hold his own against bigger guys if he gets switched.

Anyway I am ok with Rubio, Evans, Thabeet at #4 anybody else we should trade down a bit.
 
#35
I could be wrong ( I have been before! ) but I dont see Evans EVER being as good a SG as Martin is. I just dont see it happening. If Petrie wants to draft him then fine, but I hope were drafting him as a point guard.
 
S

sactownfan

Guest
#36
I could be wrong ( I have been before! ) but I dont see Evans EVER being as good a SG as Martin is. I just dont see it happening. If Petrie wants to draft him then fine, but I hope were drafting him as a point guard.
just depends on what kind of SG you want.... their both very different players... Kevin Martin is top 10 scorer...and a pure shooter...sorta Peja like with his shooting% and ability to score off of cuts to the basket... problem is Martin doesn't do much of anything else

Evans is BIG and MEAN on offense and defense... "a bully" like the scouts have been saying... he has great ball handling, and ability to create for himself and although not a pure PG he does well at creating for his teammates. He has a crazy wing span 6'11!!! and just flat out has a much better and balanced all around game... obviously just not the jump shooter as martin.

a name that i haven't heard in awhile is Bonzi Wells... he was a Big SG and kinda hogged the ball... but he didn't hurt his teammates while doing it. It was just his type of game.

Salmons and Artest forced it and were mental to some degree. Im not gonna hate players that "NEED" the ball to do well. its just about them doing it at the expense of the team and with Evans its not possible to see yet how he will play... in college he was told to score and score a lot.
 
#37
I could be wrong ( I have been before! ) but I dont see Evans EVER being as good a SG as Martin is. I just dont see it happening. If Petrie wants to draft him then fine, but I hope were drafting him as a point guard.
In a few ways Evans is already better than Martin. He's bigger & stronger without the toothpick legs & ankles. They both can attack the basket, but Martin is more likely to pull up and take a short jumper or try to create a foul. While Evans is more likely to finish at the rim. Evans is a better ballhandler than Martin, though not as good as the better PG's. And, Evans plays better defense.

Martin shoots better than Evans. But, Martin's shooting has improved since he entered the league, and there's no reason to believe that Evans can't do the same. Big tall guys can run the offense, whether it's the Princeton with the High Post Center with Hawes or Miller, the SF/PG like Hedo for the Magic. or Magic for the Lakers.

A Playmaking PG needs to have the ball to make Plays. If Evans can make plays for his teammates plus be a offensive threat, he can be as effective as any other PG, plus he can play SG and defend both positions. Versatility has always been the mark of GP picks. And, potential is the key. If Evans can play the PG now, and develop to the point where he can challenge Martin, he will be the most valuable player on the roster.
 
#38
Kevin's contract is extremely reasonable other than his injury concerns. He doesn't do much but he does score well and if we trade him there really isn't anyone who will step up to the plate. While Martin is extremely efficient, Evans is not. Martin will never be the #1 option on a championship team but if you can surround him with some players and some how make him a 2nd option I think he'll be great. He's like Reggie Miller without the clutch. He scores at about the same efficient clip as Reggie used to do. Reggie didnt' do much else other than scoring.

Evans is very inefficient when scoring at the college level eventhough he does goto the hole a lot. His shooting form is easily the worst of the guards who are projected to be in the lottery. Evans Orating and TS% were very low for someone projected to go as high as he did. Also he had a ton of TOs. I think he's a very boom or bust pick just like most Memphis players have been over the year. According to ESPN, Memphis and Louisville are some of the riskier places to draft players from. Memphis did have Rose last year but other than him and Penny 15 years ago, nobody has come out of that program and they've had a ton of busts (Wagner, Williams, etc.).

I think Evans has a small chance in being great but has a huge chance of being a monsterous bust especially for going in the top 5 of the draft. I guess he could end up being the next great wing but will have to see. I don't think he's a viable PG option in the NBA though and if your drafting him to be that, I think your going to be disappointed. You'll notice that when the Tigers put him at PG, it also co-insided with their win streak. But if you take a look at their schedule, they had 3 tough games after that point, Gonzaga, UT and Missouri on their schedule. In 2 of those 3 games they won--but it wasn't due to his stellar play. In the Mizzou game he was actually unstoppable--but I digress that his stellar play and Memphis's stellar play co-insided with a chance in schedule which was mostly against CUSA teams--none of which made the NCAA tourney.
 
#40
ok first of all. kmart is a top 10 scorer on the leagues worst team. second. he has to score 20+ppg because no one on the team can. third evans i think is going to be that pick that we shoulda woulda coulda picked but we didnt if we pass on him. kinda like arenas when we drafted gwallace instead.

i dont understand why you guys are knockin on evans, he can play the point as yu see in college, his team was better when he was at the 1. i think he's a rich mans rodney stucky, big pg, create his own shot, OWNs the dribble drive.
but i dont know we'll see. as for right now if rubio is off the board by the time #4 comes up, do doubt in my mind we should draft evans.
I agree that Evans can play the point and could be a monster down the road. But, I have a funny gut feeling that if Rubio is gone Petrie will pick Curry. (Bibby Jr.)
 
L

Lafayette

Guest
#41
Trading Kevin Martin makes sense if you get a quality player in return and a draft pick. I'm not sold on trading a guy that gets 25 points a game and can get to the line anytime. He doesn't play defense but I think that'll change with Westphal. We need Rubio just for the reason that he's a pure point guard and it'll please every Kings fan on the globe. I'm not 100% sold on Rubio but he is what the teams needs.

I do think they need to trade Noc and have Greene play. Sign/Trade McCants. Get some stuff done. This team is young and ready to play.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
#42
In a few ways Evans is already better than Martin. He's bigger & stronger without the toothpick legs & ankles. They both can attack the basket, but Martin is more likely to pull up and take a short jumper or try to create a foul. While Evans is more likely to finish at the rim. Evans is a better ballhandler than Martin, though not as good as the better PG's. And, Evans plays better defense.

Martin shoots better than Evans. But, Martin's shooting has improved since he entered the league, and there's no reason to believe that Evans can't do the same. Big tall guys can run the offense, whether it's the Princeton with the High Post Center with Hawes or Miller, the SF/PG like Hedo for the Magic. or Magic for the Lakers.

A Playmaking PG needs to have the ball to make Plays. If Evans can make plays for his teammates plus be a offensive threat, he can be as effective as any other PG, plus he can play SG and defend both positions. Versatility has always been the mark of GP picks. And, potential is the key. If Evans can play the PG now, and develop to the point where he can challenge Martin, he will be the most valuable player on the roster.
The first thing that I think about when comparing Martin to Evans is the reverse pivot move. That's the move that Martin has been working on for the last three years, the move he's been unable to come close to perfecting, the move in which he repeatedly either travels or turns the ball over. Evans can do that in his sleep. He probably could do it in jr. high school.
 
#43
The first thing that I think about when comparing Martin to Evans is the reverse pivot move. That's the move that Martin has been working on for the last three years, the move he's been unable to come close to perfecting, the move in which he repeatedly either travels or turns the ball over. Evans can do that in his sleep. He probably could do it in jr. high school.
meh... Evans is nothing compared to Martin. Talk to me when Evans puts up 25 a game in the NBA and is considered a great defender to boot.
 
#45
....er, like Martin?
Did I say "like Martin"? But obviously is we are already replacing Martin (25ppg SG) with a guy who has never played int he NBA we should want that player to be better than Martin so add some D along with the 25ppg and he will be.