twslam07
All-Star
he took a pizza into the stands and gave it to a little girl during the game. such a bad guy
Little do you know the girl was allergic to pepperonis

he took a pizza into the stands and gave it to a little girl during the game. such a bad guy
I'm guessing the NBA felt DeMarcus had reason to be upset and react the way he did considering they chose not to suspend him. Going after a players knee is among the worst no-no's a player can do.
BTW, where is that lwp character, who promised to admit he was wrong about DeMarcus being injured? He just missed tonight's game as a result of the contact from that play. That proves him wrong, unless he's going to stubbornly stick to his liar liar, pants on fire defense. I'll go out on a limb and say that's his plan....
I got banned and, yes, it is my opinion DMC was not hurt.
I got banned and, yes, it is my opinion DMC was not hurt.
Tyndel said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=9rhHEwKbNG4
Pause it at 9 and 10 seconds. Next time before rationalizing that an action might have mitigating circumstances but dismissing it outright look at the evidence first. Not only was the "potential" there for his knee to get hit it did in fact get hit...
I got banned and, yes, it is my opinion DMC was not hurt.
No, you got infractions for being a total and complete jerk, in direct violation of our first general rule (Don't be a jerk).
As far as your ridiculous insistence that DMC did not get hurt, I'm calling bull****. You might want reference Tyndel's post above. Here, I'll make it easy for you:
Still want to maintain your stance, in spite of evidence to the contrary? Or can you just suck it up and admit you were wrong? Inquiring minds would like to know.
If you got banned, you wouldn't be posting here.
So is Cousins pretending to be injured to prove a point? Or maybe you think it is just all in his head.
No, you got infractions for being a total and complete jerk, in direct violation of our first general rule (Don't be a jerk).
As far as your ridiculous insistence that DMC did not get hurt, I'm calling bull****. You might want reference Tyndel's post above. Here, I'll make it easy for you:
Still want to maintain your stance, in spite of evidence to the contrary? Or can you just suck it up and admit you were wrong? Inquiring minds would like to know.
IMHO, I think he did get a little bit bruised or whatever but it wasn't anything close to having to sit out tonight. I think in his head, sitting out justifies what he did the other night. It makes it look like Dunleavy did cheap shot him and he got hurt.
Please note, this is just my opinion. I am not personally insulting anybody.
I got banned and, yes, it is my opinion DMC was not hurt.
Unless you know something we don't, this really isn't something to have an opinion on. We have to take Cousins and the team's word that he was legitamtely hurt, unless told otherwise.
So now it's an opinion, huh? Yesterday, you were stating it as an unequivocal fact. Just like your "banned" comment, it's yet another thing your 100% wrong about.
You've been proven wrong, as evidenced by the fact that Cousins didn't play tonight because of it. And before you resort back to the "Cousins is lying and I know it" shtick, you can't at all prove it. The facts are, he missed tonight's game due to a left leg contusion caused by the Dunleavy hit. You said you'd admit that you were wrong, so man up and do it already. Failure to do so, and I propose that this thread be renamed, "LWP777 is mentally weak" as that's playing out to be a far more accurate assessment.
Cousins probably has a sore leg. He has nothing to prove and is happy to sit. Smart is probably happy to oblige him and keep him on the bench.
Trade Isaiah and Chuck For Beno and Dalembert. Should be easy, that Bucks GM is no Einstein.
Why's this? Chuck and Dally are both 72's on 2k13...(disregard that last sentence)
this is very unrelated to the topic, but: Udrih was traded to Orlando. also, both Udrih and Dalembert are expiring contracts, meaning they cannot be traded for. on the positive side, the Kings could sign them outright. if that's a good idea is a different conversation.
They can sign them as FAs and that forces them to do something with IT and Chuck or in a general sense, a PG and a center.
Please do not get nasty with me. I didn't with you. Everything we say on this board is an opinion. Only DMC knows for sure if he's hurt and if he could have played yesterday. It's not fair to say I was wrong. We will never know if I was.
Years ago, I remember Grant saying he felt Bobby Jackson wasn't as hurt as he claimed to be (Bobby used to miss a lot of games due to various injuries). It's not like I'm the only person who has had this opinion about a professional athlete. It happens all the time.
uhh...yeah? that's what I was saying. it's not that good an idea though, imo. Beno could be a good, if unlikely, addition, depending on what he wants, contract-wise. Sammy is pretty much done, though.
There is a fine line between trolling and stupid. As there is absolutely no history at all of Cousins dogging it and not wanting to play in a game, in fact the hsitory is wildly in the opposite, your statement is nonsensal at best. And I suspect you know that.
People have been saying that about Sammy for years. Its very bizarre:
Per 36:
done guy: 14.8pts (.564 .712) 12.8reb 0.9ast 0.9stl 2.9blk 2.6TO
Drummond: 13.2pts (.592 .365) 13.7reb 0.8ast 1.7stl 3.1blk 1.5TO
But I doubt it matters because frankly I've gtotten the impression Sammy doesn't want anything more to do with us. Whether a change in managemnet/ownership/coaching would alter that I do not know. Could be Cousins too -- he had to deal with him as a rookie, which couldn't have been fun.
Actually, it is quite fair to declare you wrong. The known facts do not support your "opinion" in the least. I think it's best to apply Occam's Razor in this instance. Is it more likely that Cousins, who was hit near his knee the last game he played and doesn't have a history of missing games needlessly, was actually hurt or is it more likely that he was lying just to spite you and your opinion of him??
Grant's comments were just as ludicrous and unjustified back then as yours are now. Neither of you have/had a shred of proof whatsoever. You're reaching.
Sorry but you are now on my ignore list. You are getting very personal with your insulting comments and I'm trying to stay away from that from now on here. Have a wonderful evening sir.
You sir, puzzle me. Any time someone calls you out for a flawed argument you get all hurt and say they're personally attacking you. But you have no qualms telling Padrino that he is a horrible human being