Darth Divac
Bench
Something funny for you all is that our offense is actually 11th in the league, which means that if we had any semblance of defense we'd probably be a playoff team.
Great. You think that the name Adelman is going to inspire trust and respect? That Cousins will miracously be cured by the HOFer coach Adelman? Please. I can see the smirk on Cousins face when Adelman tries to talk some sense in him. This thinking that Adelman would be the silver bullet is pure fantasy.
I think that everyone has their breaking point with this type of behavior. When a person's breaking point is different than your own, it does not make them less intelligent or ignorant. It does not make them less of a "hardcore" fan or whatever. It's simply a difference in perspective.
Great. You think that the name Adelman is going to inspire trust and respect? That Cousins will miracously be cured by the HOFer coach Adelman? Please. I can see the smirk on Cousins face when Adelman tries to talk some sense in him. This thinking that Adelman would be the silver bullet is pure fantasy.
I almost agree with this.While your first line is right of course, actually, almost by definition it does define the fan relationship.
But entirely aside from that there is an absolute right or wrong underlying debate here. Its not a fuzzy grey area about how everybody's personal feelings are doing. The black and white of it is that the team's future is either better or worse with or without Cousins. And there is a right answer to that one. One side is right, one side is wrong. There may be debate over which it is, but there is a right and wrong. And bruised feelings don't change that. In fact to a considerable degree that underlying fact is why there is a legit hardcore/"good" fan aspect to all of this. If the franchise would do better going forward with Cousins than without, and you still want him gone to assuage your delicate sensibilities, then you are in fact less hardcore than the person who is bunkering down and hanging in there for the sake of his/her team's future.
While your first line is right of course, actually, almost by definition it does define the fan relationship.
But entirely aside from that there is an absolute right or wrong underlying debate here. Its not a fuzzy grey area about how everybody's personal feelings are doing. The black and white of it is that the team's future is either better or worse with or without Cousins. And there is a right answer to that one. One side is right, one side is wrong. There may be debate over which it is, but there is a right and wrong. And bruised feelings don't change that. In fact to a considerable degree that underlying fact is why there is a legit hardcore/"good" fan aspect to all of this. If the franchise would do better going forward with Cousins than without, and you still want him gone to assuage your delicate sensibilities, then you are in fact less hardcore than the person who is bunkering down and hanging in there for the sake of his/her team's future.
Haters gonna hate.Summary: some fans might rather have losers who show what they perceive as model behavior so they can be role models for their kids. Say like the Utah Jazz of the 90s. Oh wait, never mind, Karl Malone was one of the dirtiest players ever (Stockton too).
I almost agree with this.
The questions isn't "would the franchise be better off without Cousins"? It is " would the franchise be better off using Cousins as an asset to build with on or off the floor"?
If it is in some type of trade, weather it be for a draft pick or for another player then they are using him as an asset off the floor. If they keep him then he is an asset on the floor. The black and white answer won't be know until after the decision is already made.
unless the asset they get in return is either a superstar or has genuine superstar potential, then the answer is that the franchise is not better off without demarcus cousins, regardless of what an individual thinks of him. a franchise has a valuation. much of that valuation is locked up in the quality of its assets on the court. a superstar puts asses in the seats. i don't care how much the kings love promoting isaiah thomas and jimmer fredette, it's not putting asses in the seats. but if you surround players like demarcus cousins and tyreke evans with complementary talent (preferably veterans who can play a bit of defense), and you promote cousins and evans proportionally to their talent level, rather than prioritize your gimmicks for the fast buck (as the maloofs have done recently), then you'll start to see the fans return. even if you're not a winning team, you can fill a stadium with fans if they believe. because that's what sports is about: believing your team is gonna win. most teams are not winners. only one finishes the season with a championship. everybody else is just hoping. so give your fans something to hope for. a superstar is the best place to start in the nba, so invest in the one player you already have on your roster whose got a shot at superstardom...
Better use of paragraphs would make your posts so much easier to read.
So....that's a "no" on using more paragraphs?i will never understand this criticism, nor why some individuals feel the need to resort to it rather than actively engaging in discussion. do people not read books anymore? are minor blocks of text just so visually abhorrent that people can't be bothered if their attention span is stretched beyond a few moments? seriously, what's the deal? a paragraph is not an elementary school grouping of five sentences. as a unit of text, a paragraph deals with a singular idea. i separate my thoughts as such when i feel an idea will be adequately represented in a new paragraph. and if ignore the impulse to do so, who gives a ****? pick up a book and practice if you're too accustomed to the brief status updates and 140 character limits of social media. a number of members at kf.com really need to get off this syntactical superiority complex. it's wearying...
i will never understand this criticism, nor why some individuals feel the need to resort to it rather than actively engaging in discussion. do people not read books anymore? are minor blocks of text just so visually abhorrent that people can't be bothered if their attention span is stretched beyond a few moments? seriously, what's the deal? a paragraph is not an elementary school grouping of five sentences. as a unit of text, a paragraph deals with a singular idea. i separate my thoughts as such when i feel an idea will be adequately represented in a new paragraph. and if ignore the impulse to do so, who gives a ****? pick up a book and practice if you're too accustomed to the brief status updates and 140 character limits of social media. a number of members at kf.com really need to get off this syntactical superiority complex. it's wearying...
So....that's a "no" on using more paragraphs?
Books don't have paragraphs?i write the way i write. i type very fast and very efficiently, and if it irritates people enough not to read my posts, then so be it. but i do try to break it up much more than i might otherwise. i'm just surprised people can't, ya know, read moderately-sized paragraphs, as if you don't find them elsewhere in the world, like, ya know, in books...
i just received notification this morning from the graduate studies office at california state university, chico that i was both nominated and selected to serve as a keynote speaker at our commencement ceremony in may
I liked Kingster's posts. Cousin's behavior is not only embarassing and counter-productive, it can be devisive. How else can you explain the Kings' performance against the Bulls? Without Cousins and his antics the Kings go out and hustle and run the floor and even play defense. Best game of the year. Evans looks like an all-star at the 2. Holy Cow. Everyone contributes because there is no punk in the game. Some may have trouble with that term. How about mentally weak? Easily distracted?
I didn't see the potential for Cousin's knee to get whacked. If that happened then the elbow is more understandable. More than likely he sat out tonight for a contusion of the brain, not the thigh.
I liked Kingster's posts. Cousin's behavior is not only embarassing and counter-productive, it can be devisive. How else can you explain the Kings' performance against the Bulls? Without Cousins and his antics the Kings go out and hustle and run the floor and even play defense. Best game of the year. Evans looks like an all-star at the 2. Holy Cow. Everyone contributes because there is no punk in the game. Some may have trouble with that term. How about mentally weak? Easily distracted?
I didn't see the potential for Cousin's knee to get whacked. If that happened then the elbow is more understandable. More than likely he sat out tonight for a contusion of the brain, not the thigh.
I liked Kingster's posts. Cousin's behavior is not only embarassing and counter-productive, it can be devisive. How else can you explain the Kings' performance against the Bulls? Without Cousins and his antics the Kings go out and hustle and run the floor and even play defense. Best game of the year. Evans looks like an all-star at the 2. Holy Cow. Everyone contributes because there is no punk in the game. Some may have trouble with that term. How about mentally weak? Easily distracted?
I didn't see the potential for Cousin's knee to get whacked. If that happened then the elbow is more understandable. More than likely he sat out tonight for a contusion of the brain, not the thigh.
I liked Kingster's posts. Cousin's behavior is not only embarassing and counter-productive, it can be devisive. How else can you explain the Kings' performance against the Bulls? Without Cousins and his antics the Kings go out and hustle and run the floor and even play defense. Best game of the year. Evans looks like an all-star at the 2. Holy Cow. Everyone contributes because there is no punk in the game. Some may have trouble with that term. How about mentally weak? Easily distracted?
I didn't see the potential for Cousin's knee to get whacked. If that happened then the elbow is more understandable. More than likely he sat out tonight for a contusion of the brain, not the thigh.
easily. as with any basketball game, there is only one ball, but keith smart insists on deploying multiple ball dominant personalities on the court at the same time. so demarcus' absence becomes addition by subtraction in keith smart's system--that's on smart, not on demarcus. actually, it's on petrie for trading beno udrih, who is as close to an ideal starting pg alongside tyreke evans and demarcus cousins as the kings have had in recent memory, because he knows how to move the ball, stay out of the way, and score efficiently when called upon without ever dominating the ball. but starting isaiah thomas alongside tyreke evans and demarcus cousins is often disastrous, because again, there's only one ball. the kings have won mightily with demarcus and without tyreke, as well. it's a false equivalency you're tryin' to pull out of your ***, friend...
Bull****!!!
The bigger reason was the bulls weren't 1 step slow they were 2. Wennington was on grant's show earlier and said they were breaking down in the 4th quarter from too many minutes. Well last game of a road trip against a team they thought they could look over. The only bull to show up tonight was Cook. Cuz would have destroyed them inside if healthy.
he took a pizza into the stands and gave it to a little girl during the game. such a bad guy
I didn't see the potential for Cousin's knee to get whacked. If that happened then the elbow is more understandable. More than likely he sat out tonight for a contusion of the brain, not the thigh.