That is also an issue and one that would give me pause to extend Vlade. Two high usage players can coexist and is in fact optimal. Harden-Paul,Curry- Durant, James-Irving, James-Wade.
Wow.
Doncic had a usg of 30 and fox had a usg of 24.5. You can have two 30 + usg guys on the same team. There are multiple teams every year that have that and they tend to be the better teams.Are we really going to rehash this topic again?
Those players were all established stars. They chose to team up together.
Fox was a young pup and Doncic was a rookie. Two basically rookies trying to stake their claim as the alpha dog role means someone will take a lesser role.
Either Doncic or Fox would had taken a back seat. If Doncic did, his numbers would be nowhere near what they were being the sole alpha dog. If Doncic numbers would had been average as a secondary ball handler to Fox and Bagley blew up in Atlanta, there would be people saying we should had taken Bagley over Doncic.
Doncic landed in the perfect spot. An owner and coach that wanted to give him the world and the sole key to the car. In Sacramento, we don't know if that would had been the case, as Fox has proven to be a top end point guard. With Joeger's reluctance to hand over the keys to any rookie, Doncic may not have flourished here in Sacramento as he did in Dallas.
Doncic had a usg of 30 and fox had a usg of 24.5. You can have two 30 + usg guys on the same team. There are multiple teams every year that have that and they tend to be the better teams.
If Jeorger wouldn't be on board with playing a rookie like Doncic (doubt it considering comments he made) you fire him..... Like the Kings just did.
Did no one here learn a lesson from Tyreke's Rookie season? I bet lots of ya's thought he was better than James Harden and Steph Curry at that juncture.....I'm almost cool with Bagley right now.
The other one is better and it's pretty clear, but MBIII could become good as well.
I appreciate Bagley improved game by game, let's see how he develops in the next years. Still has a long way to go, but he's on the right path.
Messina would be a good coach for him, he needs someone with that kind of basketball culture.
RS matters until the All Star break, after that it's basically valuable as summer leagues so I didn't care that much.
Doncic PER - 19.3
MAvin's - 18.9
We’re back in “Doncic’s fat” / “Bagley might get good” territory?
Smh, for some reason I thought we were slightly maturing on the subject.
Doncic is an absolute stud.
So is Bagley.
Neither pick was “wrong.” Both picks would have been great. It isn’t only black and white, folks.
This scenario is going to wind up being something like the 2010 draft. The Jazz took Gordon Hayward at 9 and the Pacers took Paul George at 10. Both great players in their own right but Paul George is just better. Hayward was great for the Jazz but you know almost all their fans wish they would have taken Paul George instead.
So they are all marginally above average efficiency..you're making my point for me. Did the Mavericks not pay pretty much twice as much for Luka as we did for Marvin???? big win for Vlade.. They have been shamefully tanking for how many seasons now while the Kings were going for it --- add that into what they've paid...Ryan Holmes PER- 20.75
Dwight Powell PER- 20.45
Chris Paul- 19.7
Don’t forget that scrub Fox at 18.18
So they are all marginally above average efficiency..you're making my point for me. Did the Mavericks not pay pretty much twice as much for Luka as we did for Marvin???? big win for Vlade.. They have been shamefully tanking for how many seasons now while the Kings were going for it --- add that into what they've paid...
Did anyone preseason think it'd be as close as Doncic shooting 32% and Marvin shooting 31% from 3?
That is a fairly stunning fact. We see the highlights on ESPN, but not the misses. It would be something if Marvin ends up shooting as good or better than Doncic from 3.
That is a fairly stunning fact. We see the highlights on ESPN, but not the misses. It would be something if Marvin ends up shooting as good or better than Doncic from 3.
Doncic took a lot of stepback threes, contested threes, last second threes, and a lot of half court heaves at ends of quarter. Marvin threes were feet set open threes. Im not sure the percentages can be compared in a way we seem to be comparing them.
He did but he missed a number of open 3’s also. He has never been a high percentage 3 point shooter yet.