Artest Wants Offense to Run Through Him:

Wheeler03

G-League
Chicago Tribune - Ron Artest says the Kings need to change their offense to run it through him. Said Artest: "I'm able to free people up, create those double and triple teams. And even if I take a bad shot, I look at myself (like) a Kobe (Bryant) or a Tim Duncan or a Michael Jordan taking a bad shot. You live with it."
 
I believe that Artest's comments were taken out of context. This looks like an attempt to stir stuff up again. I have never heard him say anyhting with this tone. It is true that he should run point sometimes, just like Adelman is doing. It changes depending upon the defenses that the Kings face. Shared responsibility.
 
so besides the fact that this is an unclear statement, who does think we should run the offense through artest? i think we should continue to run the offense thru brad miller and kenny thomas in the high post. look to pass first then take the shot type of offense.
 
tyrant said:
so besides the fact that this is an unclear statement, who does think we should run the offense through artest? i think we should continue to run the offense thru brad miller and kenny thomas in the high post. look to pass first then take the shot type of offense.

I'm not sure about "continue" -- we've already been runnning a lot of the offense through Ron, and now more recently even Bonzi there.

Of course this is jsut Sam Smith doing his muckraking thing. It is what it is --we will run soem of our offense through ron, but he's not Kobe or LeBron, and so we will run some of it elsewhere. And unless you're trying to sell a few extra papers, its not terribly controversial.
 
I do think media is out for a jucy story. but i dont think the sac bee is to controversial. they seem to report the facts and only positive stories... I dont think they ment harm or tried to make him look bad
 
This is a week old thing that was in Sacbee. Now an outlet (possibly others) and people are trying to make something out of very little and something that was meant different by Artest.

*yawn*
 
SacKings4Life21 said:
I do think media is out for a jucy story. but i dont think the sac bee is to controversial. they seem to report the facts and only positive stories... I dont think they ment harm or tried to make him look bad

The Sacramento Bee only reports facts and only positive stories? Erm, WHAT?!?!?!

Sorry, but that's simply not true although I'll admit they've seemed to take a friendlier tack towards the Maloofs and the Kings recently.

The story referenced above comes from the Chicago Tribune. It's based on a quote originally printed in an article in the Bee. The controversy came from Smith's interpretation of what Artest meant...and it's pretty much a tempest in a very small teapot, IMHO.

;)
 
Whats the controversy? Jeez. It's easy to agree with Ron on this. If this is the MOST controversial statment Smith can dig up to run out of context the boy needs to get a devining rod beceause he is pumping a dry well here.

When the offense runs through Ron good things happen. Did I miss something where Ron said he thought he should get the nod EXCLUSIVELY?
 
How are they going to consider running the offense through Ron when he is shooting 38% since joining the Kings?
 
sanvara said:
How are they going to consider running the offense through Ron when he is shooting 38% since joining the Kings?

Well running it through him doesnt mean he needs to shoot... in fact running it through him would imply that they want him to facilitate more than shoot.
 
Ron Ron is too strong to guard one on one for most players in the post, so it frees our shooters up. I think that's all he means by running the offense through him.
 
Well the media hasn't had much material to play with from old Ron Ron. I remember these comments from I think it was before last game it was aired. This is totally taken out of context. They took one little thread they could find and are trying to create controversy. Ignore it.
 
sanvara said:
How are they going to consider running the offense through Ron when he is shooting 38% since joining the Kings?

That's just about enough, Laker fan. You want to take jabs at our players, find somewhere else to do.

Thanks ever so.
 
sanvara said:
How are they going to consider running the offense through Ron when he is shooting 38% since joining the Kings?

Perfect example of a Laker/Kobe fan. Running the offense THROUGH someone does not mean them shooting the ball. It means feeding people. Passing/assisting. Something Kobe needs to do on a more regular basis.
 
DocHolliday said:
Perfect example of a Laker/Kobe fan. Running the offense THROUGH someone does not mean them shooting the ball. It means feeding people. Passing/assisting. Something Kobe needs to do on a more regular basis.

I think you lost him right there, Doc...

Talk about speaking in tongues.

;)
 
DocHolliday said:
Perfect example of a Laker/Kobe fan. Running the offense THROUGH someone does not mean them shooting the ball. It means feeding people. Passing/assisting.

I'm well aware of the terminology. I've been following the NBA for over 25 years. I obviously need to explain myself further. I don't think Ron has grasped the offense well enough yet to be able to do that effectively and his poor shooting percentage reflects that.
 
DocHolliday said:
Perfect example of a Laker/Kobe fan. Running the offense THROUGH someone does not mean them shooting the ball. It means feeding people. Passing/assisting. Something Kobe needs to do on a more regular basis.

sometimes running the offense through someone does mean that they shoot the ball. you run the offense through a player who is good enough both to set his teammates up and score the ball. that's why we ran the offense through bibby and webber and why we typically run it through bibby and miller today. those guys can set their teammates up, but score as well. you run your offense through your most versatile players...and the kings have many versatile players. thats part of their problem. they have too many guys they can run the offense through...and not enough role playing, banging, rebounding types.
 
Back
Top