We just have to be Careful not to settle. We can bring him back, he would be a hell of a 6th man kind of guy, if we could find a bonafide starter.
Gotta keep shump no matter what we do at SF. If we get a starter. Im all for pushing mason to end. Let 1-3 minutes go to fox, bogi, buddy, shump, and new guy. Get some 4 spot minutes from time to time with the right matchups. Shump would be fine with 20 min a game to really focus energy on stopping the hot hand. I’m just ready to get this new guy.
I would like to see him get a run with the parent team before we make a decision on Troy Williams. Don't get me wrong, I do like what Williams brings to the table.
Listening to Fox gush about him in the postgame interview, it could be a massive mistake not bringing Shump back.
Just saw this. It may or may not be accurate, and I'm too sleepy to check on it. But it's an eye-opener!
The Kings move to 11-5 when Shump plays more than 22 minutes, and 3-7 when he plays fewer.
I heard the same from Buddy gushing about Shump on his last interview too.
I think Shump is a real glue guy right now. I think it would be a big mistake to trade him or not re-sign him this summer.
He is our "Doug Christie" defensive stalwart of our new Super Team!![]()
Just saw this. It may or may not be accurate, and I'm too sleepy to check on it. But it's an eye-opener!
The Kings move to 11-5 when Shump plays more than 22 minutes, and 3-7 when he plays fewer.
You say it's "not founded in any sort of math." Well that's just not so. It's someone's attempt to find a meaningful trend from math-based stats. And it does bring up something interesting - that Shump (who, btw, averages about 25 min/game) has become rather important to the King's success. And when he doesn't play, they are not nearly as successful.Hate when people call stuff like this "stats".
It's not founded in any sort of math. It's box-score hunting to try and find some sort of trend that fits a narrative. Whatever it may be. Like I spent 5 minutes digging this up:
We are 6-8 when Shumpert takes 4 or more 3pt attempts per game.
We hare 6-3 when Shumpert takes 3 or less 3pt attempts per game.
So should we only limit Shump to 3 3's per game? Even though he's hitting them at a near 40% clip?
Really like Shump and he's quickly become the vet leader in the clubhouse. It's obvious the younger guys follow his lead. But I don't think we should overreact to "stats" like this that try and paint him more than he really is; a quality rotational player.
It’s a data point and data points are or should be used as a tool. Not the end all but definitely something that can be used.Hate when people call stuff like this "stats".
It's not founded in any sort of math. It's box-score hunting to try and find some sort of trend that fits a narrative. Whatever it may be. Like I spent 5 minutes digging this up:
We are 6-8 when Shumpert takes 4 or more 3pt attempts per game.
We hare 6-3 when Shumpert takes 3 or less 3pt attempts per game.
So should we only limit Shump to 3 3's per game? Even though he's hitting them at a near 40% clip?
Really like Shump and he's quickly become the vet leader in the clubhouse. It's obvious the younger guys follow his lead. But I don't think we should overreact to "stats" like this that try and paint him more than he really is; a quality rotational player.
It's really starting to stand out how important Shump is to this team, and is great to see. Fox wasn't even asked about Shump, just about team chemistry, and FOX is the one who brought Shump up, he's clearly really important to our chemistry and I hope he feels the same, feels wanted here, and I hope he stays and helps us on a championship push.
He probably isn't that's why Williams is getting that burn. Long term though I think he can work.This was an amazing game by Gabriel-- but his following games were much less impressive and reveal he struggles with consistency and foul trouble. It does not appear he's ready for the NBA.
Hell of a post. Good eye on that one.Shump tends not to play in back to back games or his minutes are limited due to his knee recovery.
Maybe that is why the Kings do so poorly in back to back games this year.