Yeah if the Kings get first pick, no matter our situation we have to take Blake Griffin, especially if Ricky Rubio isn't in the draft. For me everyone after Blake Griffin I can find big negatives or risks.
Thabeet is a spectacular defender. He changes everything around the rim. He causes havoc.
Having just watched Thabeet again, I'm sorry, but I simply don't see how you can watch him play and not really like him as a pro prospect. When I initially suggested the Gambit back early in the year, I was going off of whate he was last year and thinking of him as a roleplaying 3rd big, but the more the see of how far he has progressed this season the more the possibility of him as a legit NBA starter looms. He's got the size, he's got stamina for such a huge player, and again I am sorry, but I am not sure I can remember ANY 7'3" player ever moving like he does. Its ridiculous. Know Sabonis when he was young was supposed to be an athlete. But Thabeet...guys that huge just don't move like he does. He's even developed a mean streak. No more lost and confused stuff -- he knows what he wants to do out there, knows he is good, and is developing a swagger.
What if the other team goes small and Thabeet has to guard a 6'8 - 6'10" wing player out on the periphery? What kind of defender will he be then?
If he can't be a legit scorer inside, then that's what's going to happen to him.
Harden's got some all-around skill, but find me a successful 6'4" NBA shooting guard who isn't a sensational athlete.
Actually this may be his biggest problem. Because he leaves his feet and goes after every shot in reach, he puts himself out of rebound position. Hopefully, in the NBA, he'll learn to throttle back and be more selective. Defending his own man isn't going to be a problem because of his length, as long as he doesn't leave his feet, and blocks out his man to maintain rebound position. It's on help defense, were he'll have to learn when to try and block, and when to rebound.I agree 100 %. He is a monster under that basket straight up. There was a sequence late in the game when he was just not letting anyone even touch the basket.
The only negative I can see with him as a pro is all the fouls that would get called on him, simply due to the fact that he is so physical and goes after EVERY ball.
But if that's the biggest negative - I want this kid.
I would have a hard time taking Thabeet with the number one choice in the draft. I would have no problem taking him from number 3 on. If Griffin is as coveted as those NBA scouts say, then he could be a bargining chip to aquire another first round pick in the draft, or another first next year. I've heard that Oklahoma really wants him.
Anyway it would be nice to end up with another pick and get Thabeet too.
Easy. Joe Dumars.
I think the key to undersized SG isn't pure athleticism but a nice all-around game. Something that Wade and Mayo have. As does Harden. Notice I'm not predicting Harden is the next Dumars, Wade, or Mayo. But he'll be at least a borderline all-star.
From the games I have seen this season that's not really true anymore -- at this point Thabeet is actually one of the more disciplined major shotblockers I have seen at the college level, and if anything it looks like he is holding back out there so that he doesn't pick up fouls. He's a Top 20 college rebounder at over 10 a game, and he only averages 2.5fls a game in over 30 minutes a night, and has only fouled out once, despite being a huge shotblocker and the anchor of his defense. Its just another of the areas where you are seeing a sophistication to his game now that suggests he's gone beyond just physical freak and is moving toward basketball player. With his size he doesn't have to fly around nearly as much as a shorter player, and can just loom until the last second.Actually this may be his biggest problem. Because he leaves his feet and goes after every shot in reach, he puts himself out of rebound position. Hopefully, in the NBA, he'll learn to throttle back and be more selective. Defending his own man isn't going to be a problem because of his length, as long as he doesn't leave his feet, and blocks out his man to maintain rebound position. It's on help defense, were he'll have to learn when to try and block, and when to rebound.
I like Thabeet, but despite him averaging alot of boards, it is worrying to see how he gets them. He doesn't box out and he is regularly out battled for the rebound by a guy half the size of him. The rebounds he gets are the ones that fall to him. He needs to work on his rebounding because with his size and athleticism there is little stopping him from being an elite rebounder at the next level. Right now it is just not there, though.
His shotblocking is excellent as people already know. Defense is very so-so but that can improve with work. He is still a force in the lane.
One of the things that worries me is that he is simply weak with the ball under the basket. He just cannot hold onto the ball at all. It happens at least twice a game where he has the ball under the rim, all he needs to do is sky and throw it down, yet he loses it and the ball goes flying away. How on earth is he going to cope with that in the NBA? It is almost as if he is not strong enough to hold onto the ball during contact. I've never seen a player lose it as much as him.
That being said, Thabeet is never going to be drafted for his offensive abilities. I like him and his potential, and particularly his shot-blocking and intimidation. But if the dude simply can't do anything on offense, how is he going to get on the court? Especially on a team like the Kings, where defense is disregarded and offense is the be-all and end-all.
I like him and would be fine picking him, but I just can't see Petrie taking a raw, defensive player with a high pick.
Joe Dumars wasn't athletic? I would strongly disagree with that. If you were going to go from that era though, you could have chosen Mitch Richmond. But that era is not coming back, and the GMs who think it's coming back are the ones who draft guys like Adam Morrison.
The fact is, there's not a successful 6'4" shooting guard in the NBA right now who isn't a crazy athlete. Wade, Mayo... sensational athletes. Harden isn't one.
Harden will probably have a role in the NBA. But a "nice all around game" when you're undersized and not a great athlete never translates to stardom.
Is your opinion changing on Thabeet? Or you opinion on the draft class lessening?
Honestly, I think it's a waste thinking about it. I don't believe Petrie would be interested in him.
Joe Dumars wasn't athletic? I would strongly disagree with that. If you were going to go from that era though, you could have chosen Mitch Richmond. But that era is not coming back, and the GMs who think it's coming back are the ones who draft guys like Adam Morrison.