McLemore and Stauskas both play the same position, but I think it's unfair to say the two are that similar outside of that. I watched just about every Michigan game over the past two seasons and his improvement from his freshman and sophomore years is probably the most impressive thing about him. In his freshman year he was the 4th or 5th option on that team, a spot-up shooter from the corner, a 3-point specialist, that was about it. The next year Burke and Hardaway Jr. were drafted, Robinson III underachieved, and McGary got hurt. How much do you expect from a guy like Stauskas in a horrible scenario like that? Probably not much. However all he did was add a ton of new elements to his game, became the star of that team, won the Big 10 Player of the Year award, and was one late 3-pointer away against Kentucky from taking his team to the Final Four. He had to play almost every minute because when he left the game things almost always went bad.
Point being, McLemore is more potential, Stauskas also has potential, but he has proven that he can deliver when having to shoulder the load. He can step up. Now I hope McLemore can too and I believe that he will.
Now in terms of skill sets. Right now McLemore is a catch and shoot player who could be a successful penetrator if he chose to do it more, please finish with layups instead of dunks right now though. Stauskas can run an offense. His ball handling, passing, and ability to see the floor are excellent. Defensively he does have work to do and is a bit slow laterally, but I don't care as much about individual defense as team defense and his team defense will be fine, he is a competitor with a high basketball IQ. Now I hope both McLemore and Stauskas can do well and I think they can, but they are not the same style of player and Stauskas brings way more to the table than Anthony Morrow.