Cmon mate. You are better than that.![]()
1) See my first post on the topic. I wrote "I give up to try to understand, what the FO is trying to accomplish". You know I assume basketball lifers have a plan in place, when making decisions. That doesn't mean I as a fan need to understand it right? And that also doesn't mean I necessarily need to agree with everything the FO or coach does or in this case is rumored to do, or else we could simply shut down this board and put up a gif with "In Vlade we trust! End of discussion!"
2) No. You need an offense capable of scoring against a set defense. That doesn't necessarily mean a big that can bang.
3) Can Zbo teach WCS some toughness? I think so and I agreed with John Galt, who made that point before.
4) Depends of what you are trying to accomplish.
Well, I didn't know that the FO had to run all their plans and goals by the fans before implementing them. Have they and will they make mistakes? Of course. But they have been doing a pretty good job overall these past couple years so I will give them the benefit of the doubt until I see a plan fail. Just because YOU want them to do something doesn't mean it's right. And darn right I think he could teach our kids a few things. Things they can work on in practice daily, like going against a talented strong big man like they might face against some other teams.
So when I as a simple fan disagree with or simply don't understand something, the FO is rumored to do, it means the FO has to run all their plans and goals by the fans before implementing them? Maybe it's just me, but I would guess Vlade, Joerger and pretty much everyone else in the Kings organisation couldn't care less, what some fan on the internet writes about their decisions.
This is a message board. It's meant for discussions and the exchange of opinions. For it to be an interesting place you need some sort of disagreement or else it would simply turn into an echo chamber.
So maybe we should try to have a fair discussion instead of trying to use knockout arguments to discredit other users. Of course I think my opinion has some merit to it. I would assume you think the same about your own opinion right?
So back to the topic:
I already said, that I agree that Zbo could teach our young bigs some toughness or in your own words "going against a talented strong big". But with Zbo being one of the very few bigs, who relies on superior weight, question is, if battling against strong bigs is really one of the most important lessons our young guys need to learn. A few years from now Zbo's career will be over. As of right now only DMC and Embiid qualify as strong talented bigs, that are primarely scorers.
There are other strong dudes out there, like Adams for example, but they very rarely present a scoring threat outside of putbacks and the occasional jumphook once their primary offensive set fails.
So what Zbo could do is try to teach Skal or Willie how to establish position to keep someone like Adams off the board.
But while Zbo is someone, who relies completely on positioning to rebound, Skal and Willie are more athletic rebounders, who will never have the tools to hold their ground like Randolph.
From my point of view Skal has a very solid understanding of boxing out and holding position. But I agree that Willie could use lots of polishing in that area.
The thing is, that from my understanding the path to become a good rebounder, that Willie needs to take, is not the path Randolph can teach him. Willie will never be able to bang. If he tries he will simply bounce off his man.
He needs to establish position by being quicker to the ball than his opponent not by wrestling him down.
Now of course Zbo could try to teach him, how to see angles and how to predict where the ball is bouncing off to. I agree, that this would be a huge help.
But ultimately I personally think, that Zbo is not the best mentor for our agile bigs. Someone who made a career out of being a quick and athletic big, would be tremendous. Hence why I mentioned Kevin Garnett, who already worked as a consultant for the Bucks ( teaching Thon Maker a thing or two, who is very similar to Willie and Skal). KG also could teach Willie how to deal with stronger and heavier opponents (btw. we already have two strong and heavy dudes on our team for Willie to go against every day in practice) as a light but quick big man. That's something Zbo never had to do, because he always was one of the heaviest and strongest guys on the floor.
You know what, you are right on the bolded. I've worked crazy hours this week at work and have been a bit on the cranky side the past day or so. Sorry it carried over to this board.
I still think someone like Zbo could be a great asset to this young team, teaching good post moves and being a big that can match up against other big strong players. KK can as well, but I don't think you can have justone such player. A couple good vet options on the front line would be ideal to me. And while Boogie and Embiid might be the best players to exemplify that player type, they aren't the only ones who would give our front line some issues.
I don't ascribe to throwing the youth out there as starters and/or getting the bulk of the minutes as much as some others. Much of their development in the first year or two (especially) should be in practices and then they earn their minutes in games as the coach gains confidence in what they can do. Rookies especially often hit the wall partway through the season, they don't know the ins and outs of the league, they can rarely match up against the much older and stronger vets. Don't short them on the time they need to develop and learn before "throwing them to the wolves". We've seen issues when doing that time and time again. Controlled repetition in practice is a great way to instill good habits early.
I was at the game where DMC and Randolph got into it and I can tell you that DMC didn't want any part of ZBO.
Zbo with Hill, Buddy, Bogdanovic, Skal to space floor will be niceeeeee. Best of all he will make WCS, Skal, Papa, Giles tough. Love it.
Very happy with this. He is a great veteran to teach the young kids. He was a punk in his early years and has grown into a great guys and great role model. He is the gritty type that never quits which will go a long way in teaching these front court things a thing or two over the next couple of years.
Although he is 36, he is still a capable scorer on the low block and will not be taking too much time off Skal. When the Kings need a bucket, they can use Randolph to get a basket which is something this team has lacked since Boogie was traded.
Yeah he was a member of the original JailBlazers. Also had some back issues early on if I remember correctly, but overcame it all and went on to have a very nice career. Mentally tough player which is just as important as being physically tough.
Thought they were knee problems, but this was probably back when I still lived in Santa Barbara (a few stops before I got to Portland). My timing could be way off because he was still here when I moved here.Yeah he was a member of the original JailBlazers. Also had some back issues early on if I remember correctly, but overcame it all and went on to have a very nice career. Mentally tough player which is just as important as being physically tough.
Randolph is the trickier one for me to wrap my mind around. George Hill is a good player, possibly game changing player, and we have a 19 year old point, so i get that. Zach will be 37 (?), the front court is loaded, and that 12 mil could've really been put to use.. I hope he imparts that knowledge on our young big core
It's for 2 years. This year and next. Not exactly an anchor contract.
Besides, what else do you think the 12M could have been spent on??
Absorbing contracts from teams eager to shed salary?
It might even look good to Boston about now..