This may have been posted in the thread already, but Jason Ross just made a good point while covering for Grant.
Al Jeffersons' numbers for this season so far
PPG 17.8 RPG 9.30 APG 2.1 EFF + 19.81
Jason Thompsons' numbers for this season so far
PPG 14.2
RPG 8.90 APG 2.1 EFF + 17.41
And I did not realize that Jefferson has had micro-fracture surgery? And he's making about 12 mill, topping out at about 15 mill?? Is a guy with those numbers and that has had micro fracture surgery worth that much, when we pretty much have the equivalent in Jason Thompson. I mean Thompsons' numbers have to be affected by the last week, and he's just in a slump, probably the longest slump of his 1.5 year career.
If Jason ross even remotely suggested that JT is an equivalent for Al Jefferson, you need to call him up and tell him he's an idiot for me.
Big Al started slow coming back form the knee, has gotten stroenger every month, and is averaging 20-11 this month again, after averaging 23 and 11 last season. Last night you put him against Dwight, and its no blowout. Its not even guaranteed who comes out on top. There is a vast gulf there. Jefferson scores every night as a primary option. He is frequently doubled. He has a huge psot game. Jason scores mostly garbage points. And occasinal jumper, an occasional take.
The thing people often don't realize is just HOW much better top stars are then guys down a level or two who have solid numbers. A top star, a Big Al, a Tyreke, spend their entire basketball lives being doubled and game planned for. And they still put up better numers than anybody else. Give them the attention that JT draws, and they score 30 a night. Have teams treat Tyreke the way they treat Beno -- single coverage, just guard him with your PG, and he's 30-5-5. Jefferson is >>> JT.
How about,
Minnesota in:
Martin, Garcia, and Rodriguez
Sacramento in:
Ramon Sessions and Al Jefferson
Our new lineup would be:
Evans / Sessions
Greene / Udrih
Casspi / Noc
Jefferson / Thompson / Brockman
Hawes / Thompson / (Armstrong)
We save an additional 1.4 million in salary this year, sew up a very good PF for 4 years @ 12 mil each year, and Minnesota gets the wings they need. Obviously, we would have to trade or make a free agent run for a kicka** sg, but they are easier to find, and come cheaper than all star quality PF's.
Or we can shift Evans to the two and have this:
Sessions / Udrih
Evans / Greene
Casspi / Noc
Jefferson / Thompson / Brockman
Hawes / Thompson / (Armstrong)
That reminds me of the Miami Heat's set up.
While I would prefer Bosh as well, big Al would not be a bad compensation either. He is slowly getting back from his issues with the knee but when healthy is a genuine 20/10 PF in the league and one with an excellent low post game.
If we can't get Bosh, Jefferson would be a great compensation IMHO. Whoever we potentially get out of this 2, we still need that defensive C to round out the frontcourt.
If Jason Ross even remotely suggested that JT is an equivalent for Al Jefferson, you need to call him up and tell him he's an idiot for me.
Big Al started slow coming back form the knee, has gotten stroenger every month, and is averaging 20-11 this month again, after averaging 23 and 11 last season. Last night you put him against Dwight, and its no blowout. Its not even guaranteed who comes out on top. There is a vast gulf there. Jefferson scores every night as a primary option. He is frequently doubled. He has a huge post game. Jason scores mostly garbage points. And occasional jumper, an occasional take.
The thing people often don't realize is just HOW much better top stars are then guys down a level or two who have solid numbers. A top star, a Big Al, a Tyreke, spend their entire basketball lives being doubled and game planned for. And they still put up better numbers than anybody else. Give them the attention that JT draws, and they score 30 a night. Have teams treat Tyreke the way they treat Beno -- single coverage, just guard him with your PG, and he's 30-5-5. Jefferson is >>> JT.
Factoring in age, injury history, contract status, potential, fit and production give me Thompson 10 times out 10 please.
Thompson isn't a star and won't be paid like one. Jefferson's not a star and is paid like one, that's recipe for disaster, especially when factor how JT FITS with this team's roster dynamics.
Also, Ryan as far as Kevin...if he is traded, I don't beleive it will be before the trade deadline. It would be in the off-season. It's going to take a few months to be certain if Tyreke and Martin play well together. Today is Jan. 14th. The trade deadline is Feb 18th correct?
One month would not be a fair guage in my opinion.
What does that even mean? I like the guy, but he's definitely a work in progress. Roster dynamics? Maybe we should trade for more wing players?especially when factor how JT FITS with this team's roster dynamics.
Factoring in age, injury history, contract status, potential, fit and production give me Thompson 10 times out 10 please.
Thompson isn't a star and won't be paid like one. Jefferson's not a star and is paid like one, that's recipe for disaster, especially when factor how JT FITS with this team's roster dynamics.
I just had never really looked at the guy's stat lines until now, and I'm not a fan of acquiring people that have had micro-fracture surgery. It just scares the **** out of me.
Also, Ryan as far as Kevin...if he is traded, I don't beleive it will be before the trade deadline. It would be in the off-season. It's going to take a few months to be certain if Tyreke and Martin play well together. Today is Jan. 14th. The trade deadline is Feb 18th correct?
One month would not be a fair guage in my opinion.
I just had never really looked at the guy's stat lines until now, and I'm not a fan of acquiring people that have had micro-fracture surgery. It just scares the **** out of me.
Also, Ryan as far as Kevin...if he is traded, I don't beleive it will be before the trade deadline. It would be in the off-season. It's going to take a few months to be certain if Tyreke and Martin play well together. Today is Jan. 14th. The trade deadline is Feb 18th correct?
One month would not be a fair guage in my opinion.
Factoring in age, injury history, contract status, potential, fit and production give me Thompson 10 times out 10 please.
Thompson isn't a star and won't be paid like one. Jefferson's not a star and is paid like one, that's recipe for disaster, especially when factor how JT FITS with this team's roster dynamics.
Uh yeah.Other, of course, than being one of the ten best bigs in the whole league.
He's not a SUPERstar. But that's different, and largely irrelevant since we don't need him to be. Quite obviously nobody is suggesting that we get Al Jefferson to be THE star here and lead the team. His intended role is wingman to our own home grown superstar.
The pure post game and potential for interference with Reke is one of the reasons that I prefer Bosh's inside outside abilities, but it can and has been worked around time and again in this league. In fact titles have been won with that "problem" -- think Duncan with Parker, Shaq with Wade. With careful application, its far from an insurmountable problem, and the space such a pairing creates for all the shooters on your roster is ridiculous. Bigs are already cheating over to cut off Reke's penetration because they don't respect our frontcourt guys at all, and on most nights they shouldn't. Might as well give them something to worry about in there.
Brick, for someone like you who preaches defense a lot, you sure have fondness for offensive bigs who don't play a lick of defense.
Bigs who win championships are good to great defenders: your Shaq, Ben Wallace, David Robinson, Duncan, Rasheed Wallace, Gasol, Rodman, Laimbeer, Hakeem.
Al Jefferson is just a guy who scores a lot of points, grab a lot of rebounds and don't win you a lot of games. We've seen his type of bigs before (Zach Randolph, SAR, etc). This type of bigs will make your team entertaining but they never take you to the promise land, not even when they're paired with supposedly star players.
There is a myth surrounding Al Jefferson. The myth is that he can be an average if not good defender if he is just put back at his rightful place at PF. As if coaches have never thought of it before. Fact is, Jefferson is even worse at guarding PFs than Cs. Jason Thompson, for all his flaws, at least tried to guard his man. Jefferson, for all intent and purpose, plays as if there's a clause in his contract that reduces his salary if he even attempt to put his hands up.
That's not to say I'm completely opposed to Big Al. If the Kings are going to abandon this defense thing and just go all out Phoenix style then I say get Jefferson and let's have some 150-145 games. But if there is a believe that defense needs to be stressed then JT is the better way to go. This has been said many times before but offense is not our problem. We desparately need a good defensive big and Al Jefferson is not that.
I agree and disagree. I agree that we need to be thinking defense first, but our offense is far from perfect. Despite the fact that we're one of the best offensive teams in the league, we go for quarters where we can't buy a bucket, and it's cost us games. Trading Martin for Jefferson doesn't fix our defensive issues, but it does balance the offense in a style more befitting of the post season. Right now, with the exception of a few jumpers by JT and Spencer Hawes hot streaks, the majority of our offense consists of perimeter guys making threes or slashing to the hoop.
Ideally, we wan't a player that can balance the offense and be a lock down defender from the 4/5 spot, but there are only a handful of guys like that in the entire league, and none of them are going anywhere any time soon. Our only chance at one of them is to get lucky in the upcoming draft (which may just have a few of those guys in it). Other than that, we might as well try and get an offensive stud big man and put some defensive role players around him (think Gortat). You can win with team defense and defensive role players, we ourselves came damn close with Pollard (despite starting Webber and Vlade, neither of whom were known as defensive stoppers).
I like the fact how you have claimed that bigs that don't play defence don't win. May I present to you Pau Gasol who is an average low post defender and Lakers won jack **** until they got him.Brick, for someone like you who preaches defense a lot, you sure have fondness for offensive bigs who don't play a lick of defense.
Bigs who win championships are good to great defenders: your Shaq, Ben Wallace, David Robinson, Duncan, Rasheed Wallace, Gasol, Rodman, Laimbeer, Hakeem.
Al Jefferson is just a guy who scores a lot of points, grab a lot of rebounds and don't win you a lot of games. We've seen his type of bigs before (Zach Randolph, SAR, etc). This type of bigs will make your team entertaining but they never take you to the promise land, not even when they're paired with supposedly star players.
There is a myth surrounding Al Jefferson. The myth is that he can be an average if not good defender if he is just put back at his rightful place at PF. As if coaches have never thought of it before. Fact is, Jefferson is even worse at guarding PFs than Cs. Jason Thompson, for all his flaws, at least tried to guard his man. Jefferson, for all intent and purpose, plays as if there's a clause in his contract that reduces his salary if he even attempt to put his hands up.
That's not to say I'm completely opposed to Big Al. If the Kings are going to abandon this defense thing and just go all out Phoenix style then I say get Jefferson and let's have some 150-145 games. But if there is a believe that defense needs to be stressed then JT is the better way to go. This has been said many times before but offense is not our problem. We desparately need a good defensive big and Al Jefferson is not that.
Brick, for someone like you who preaches defense a lot, you sure have fondness for offensive bigs who don't play a lick of defense.
Bigs who win championships are good to great defenders: your Shaq, Ben Wallace, David Robinson, Duncan, Rasheed Wallace, Gasol, Rodman, Laimbeer, Hakeem.
Al Jefferson is just a guy who scores a lot of points, grab a lot of rebounds and don't win you a lot of games. We've seen his type of bigs before (Zach Randolph, SAR, etc). This type of bigs will make your team entertaining but they never take you to the promise land, not even when they're paired with supposedly star players.
There is a myth surrounding Al Jefferson. The myth is that he can be an average if not good defender if he is just put back at his rightful place at PF. As if coaches have never thought of it before. Fact is, Jefferson is even worse at guarding PFs than Cs. Jason Thompson, for all his flaws, at least tried to guard his man. Jefferson, for all intent and purpose, plays as if there's a clause in his contract that reduces his salary if he even attempt to put his hands up.
That's not to say I'm completely opposed to Big Al. If the Kings are going to abandon this defense thing and just go all out Phoenix style then I say get Jefferson and let's have some 150-145 games. But if there is a believe that defense needs to be stressed then JT is the better way to go. This has been said many times before but offense is not our problem. We desparately need a good defensive big and Al Jefferson is not that.
I like the fact how you have claimed that bigs that don't play defence don't win. May I present to you Pau Gasol who is an average low post defender and Lakers won jack **** until they got him.
Fact is NO ONE here is asking Al to be THE man. He will be a wingman to Reke, just as Gasol is a wingman to Kobe.
There is a VERY limited number of bigs that play both ways equally well and those will never become available.
If you get big Al and pair him with Reke, you have your inside outside duo and then you surround them with role players that complement them. Trade for Dalembert as your defensive C. Have Cisco as your jack of all trades master of none SG that players scrappy D, shoots the long ball and makes the extra pass. Then you have Omri or Greene at SF who all do a bit of everything to help out and you have your starting 5 that can make you contender.
Young Tim Duncan is not going to walk through that door any time soon and I can almost guarantee you that frontcourt of Jefferson and Dalembert would beat the **** out of JT and Spencer pairing any day of the week and twice on sundays and would certainly make you more of a contender all day, every day.
Gasol is no longer just an average defender. He used to be but he improved his defense last season and the Lakers won it all. So Gasol is another example that makes my point. You need defense back there. And there is no comparison between Gasol and Al defensively. Even on Gasol's worst day he's still a much better defender than Big Al will ever hope to be.
JT can score 35 pts if it's Jefferson guarding him. Al/Dalembert may be a little bit better right now because of JT/Hawes' lack of experience. But in a couple of years, that may very well not be the case.
How do you know an elite big man isn't going to be available? When the Blazers were trying to trade Zach Randolph, the Lakers didn't pair up Kobe with Zach did they? The Piston didn't try to put SAR alongside Billups and Rip did they? The Lakers and Pistons were patient and was rewarded with Gasol and Rasheed, who delivered the championships. We need to do the same - patience. This rebuild is going to take time.
I'm not a big IF person. But what if, after aquiring Jefferson, we then in the offseason, either through the draft or freeagency, aquire a defensive center to play along side of him. Or perhaps by help from the tooth fairy, Hawes suddenly bulks up and learns how to play tough defense. Thats if he's still around. Then Jefferson isn't as big a liability on the defensive side of the ball.
I think that if a player brings enough from one side of the court and is passable on the other side, then its worth the effort to compensate for his liabilites. Its really no different than trading for a great defensive player that isn't all that good offensively. Your willing to give up what offense you lose with him for the defense he brings. You just try to compensate somewhere else.
Ideally you still pair him with a defensive minded C. Even if we were to go after and get Al or Bosh I still think we would be looking at Defensive 5s like Emeka, Chandler etc.