Wolves @ Kings Game Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
blerg. not the way i wanted thi game to go. the red sox better not loose to the yankees.....

kings are in a win one lose one rut. i just hope they start the playoffs on a winning note
 
GoSACtown said:
game over, never had the lead in the second half.....never had the lead since mobley's turnover....and then they say theres no such thing as momentum....but mobley did get his shot going, but too late..


WAY TOO GO, TECHNICAL ON KENNY THOMAS...GOD WHY IS THIS TEAM SO STUPID ?WE HAD IT TO 9

It doesn't matter the way we have been shooting it would take 10 more min for us to score 9 points. And we wouldn't stop them more than once down court. The Kings only play when they want to play, today they didn't want to play.
 
Wow, talk about a lousy second half, in all aspects.

Just a bad outing...We'll get over it.

On the bright side, Eddie House was really good again.
 
piksi said:
Anyone else thinks that - the turnover at the end of the first half was big ?
I am one of those who think that turnover was critical and I am not even allowed to think so.
 
Too much whining to the refs, losing their compusure, not playing any defense, and not making shots=loss. Wolves still!! at 53%. Can't win alot of games, letting an opponent shoot that well.
 
For instance if it was 1 the kings would only have to win 1 more game to get a playoff spot. Or minn would have to lose 1. unless we lose out and they win out we are in.
 
piksi said:
I assume - there is a reason why Evans is playing late in the 4th

I would love to know what it is.

Anyone else thinks that - the turnover at the end of the first half was big ?
Cat wasn't stopping Spree, maybe Evans could. Adelman wanted to go up and down the coourt real quick to try to make up points.

The turnover at the end of the half was meaningless as far as turnovers go.
 
well we've seen to be in a win one lose run stage...maybe after this loss..and bad shooting performance that we will bounce back against the Sonics...and then maybe against the Blazers...it just sucks that we didn't get our shot going in the second half...i mean who really thought that we wouldn't have..plus we were at home?? Like i said we must have used all the juices up against the Cavs who are up by like 20 to the Mavs....Oh well ya win some ya lose some as the saying goes...Seattle better watch out..im guessing the Kings are gonna be a bit PO'd going into that game....
 
Meaningless?? Instead of going into the half with a one point lead with all the momentum on their side, and it's meaningless? Since when did stupid turnovers become meaningless.
 
piksi said:
sure You are. We never recovered from it.

I don't care what game it is. If 1 turnover in the 1st half costs you the game then this is the dumbest game ever. look at the shooting % ppl that is what costs us the game. No defense and no offense will do that not 1 turnover at the end of the 1st half.
 
Entity said:
I don't care what game it is. If 1 turnover in the 1st half costs you the game then this is the dumbest game ever. look at the shooting % ppl that is what costs us the game. No defense and no offense will do that not 1 turnover at the end of the 1st half.

No, that one turnover did not cost the game, but it sure as hell helped.
 
Am I missing something? Why put Bibby back in when he's done nothing and pull House out while he's playing great.

Kings just didn't play smart bball.
 
Heuge said:
The turnover at the end of the half was meaningless as far as turnovers go.
Putting the momentum thing aside, that play along is a 4 PTs SWING!!! Yeah it is meaningless. Noboby is wrong.

Can we blame the ref now? :rolleyes:
 
mazzystar said:
Meaningless?? Instead of going into the half with a one point lead with all the momentum on their side, and it's meaningless? Since when did stupid turnovers become meaningless.
Since they were in the turnover was in the second half. It didn't stop a run. They had time to regroup.

The 15-4 run to start the second half is what killed them. The fact that they couldn't shoot killed them. No Brad killed them.

The turnover at the end of the half meant nothing. It wasn't good, but it certainly did not cost us this game.
 
mazzystar said:
Yep. Momentum killer, turnover before the half.


If a team can't regain momentum in 24 minutes then that team sucks. plain and simple unless you think we suck don't dwell on 1 turnover please that doesn't sound good for our team. Just say we were not shooting well today maybe next game or something don't say our team can't recover from 1 turnover that happend in the first half.
 
gat said:
Am I missing something? Why put Bibby back in when he's done nothing and pull House out while he's playing great.

Kings just didn't play smart bball.

I was wondering too. But you know RA, he likes to stay with the starters no matter what.
 
Since93 said:
I am one of those who think that turnover was critical and I am not even allowed to think so.

You might want to check the thread. I actually took the time to apologize so you can quit whining now...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top