Will Cousins ever figure it out?... [EDIT] I think we're seeing it!

OK, so we've got DMC and yes he's an amazing player and nobody questions that. But we've replaced everyone else and he is the only common denominator. Also, our opposing teams don't have Cousins and they whip the Kings every night. But I'll trust Vlade. If he wants to keep him and keep building around him, that's fine. If not, that's fine too

Well said. I'm with you, in that I do trust Vlade. He knows exactly what's going on and he is the man for the decision. I'll go with what he decides
 
We don't all know that at all.

Normally we draft crap players who do a whole lot of diddly once they leave town. The very best of them might continue doing what they were in Sacramento.

How are the careers of Jimmer, Trob and Nik turning out?

How many scoring titles did KMart win once he left this place? Where is Jason Thompson on the Warriors bench? Spencer Hawes in Charlotte? Cisco I think is out of the league now. Douby definitely.

Aside from the Whiteside aberration, which every team in the league missed on for years while he bounced around the world, its really been since the good ole days nearly 15 years ago with Gerald Wallace, and to a lesser degree Hedo, that we drafted guys, then sent them off to better careers. Right now teams are being smarter about how they use Reke and IT -- and that's the true lesson, how other franchises USE personnel -- but neither guy is putting up numbers beyond what they put up here. Just being fitted in better. Not ****ed with as much. This franchise eternally makes everything harder than it has to be.

And the point stands -- there is absolutely NO evidence in the entire history of the Sacramento franchise that you are going to dump a player of Cousins' magnitude and go skipping down the road and pick up something better, or even equivalent. When you're a fat dumpy guy and you and your supermodel girlfriend start having problems, you are an idiot to dump her assuming you'll just pick up another. You love the one you're with, and you fight to make it work. Anything else normally turns out to be cowardice or stupidity.

I am in no way condoning trading Cousins. I just feel he needs a new team to get his act together and start getting some wins. I don't see him taking this team to where they need to be down the road but I'd love to be wrong on that of course.
 
The Raiders completely changed philosophies after Al's passing and it's paying off. They went out and got the number two head office guy from a established winning organization in Green Bay and let him have total control with little to no input from ownership. Instead of the Al Davis/Vivek style of chasing your own tail trying to win now they realized that wasn't feasible with the roster they had and rebooted. And what do you know they've had the three best drafts of the last 10 year consecutively and will go into the off season with the most cap space in the league. The Kings did the opposite this off season, hiring the local hero that no other team in league would dream of hiring and doubled down on winning now. The Kings have a superstar that the Raiders didn't, so it's not the best parallel, but these teams have diverged in their approach. Good thing about sports is we won't have to wait very long to see how things work out for both sides.

I say waiting ten years is a long time to see how things work out...
 
seeing this kinda poopoo from kings fans just kills me. cousins hasn't "panned out" like we wanted him to? at 25/10, completely unstoppable on his best nights, and with an improved ability to protect the rim, he hasn't "panned out"?!! i'd hate to see how you'd describe ben mclemore's development!! cousins has absolutely lived up to his end of the bargain. he entered the league as a question mark, and he has transformed himself into a top-10 player and legitimate superstar-level talent despite the utter dysfunction that this franchise has forced him to endure. his attitude has improved considerably in that span, though it still needs further refining, and he should definitely be more efficient within the kings' offense, but it's worth noting that he would likely be more efficient if george karl was treating him like the best center in the nba, rather than the biggest guard in the nba...

No where in my post did I mention that Cousins specifically didn't "pan out". There were high expectations from him being the number 5 pick and with all the tools he had in his arsenal and he's delivered on the basketball side of things. What he has not panned out on is his maturation process as a NBA veteran...entering his sixth year I think it's safe to say he is a vet now. I still feel he needs a change of scenery before we can see him becoming a winner consistently and not in small spurts.
 
If Cousin's continues this poor play tomorrow, then i'd start to get worried. Gobert is out although im not sure how Favors will do on him if he is
 
Sometimes I think maybe we should rent DMC to another team to show some of you how dominate he is, this is down right silly. Look at IT/Tyreke we wanted them both gone and the are doing very well for the selfs elsewhere. Now image if PDA dumbass would have kept both who will be on bargain deals now. Seriously it takes a special idiot to let talent walk when you're a small market team. It takes a bigger fool to trade a 25-10 center who plays defense. Ya we could get Boston's package of let's just say top 3 pick/ smart/ Crowder but everyone in here will be bitching when in 2 years we are watching DMC in the finals. Why cause an elite couch like Stevens will plant his ass in the paint and have him play defense. This place would erupt if DMC/IT won a ring on the same damn team while we are having prospect threads to see who pairs up with Smart/ the big kid from UK.

When you have a top 10 player you don't trade him period. Plus he's not healthy there's a article in bleacher report stating scouts say DMC is hurt and its clear as day when the scout and watch film.
 
But it doesn't really matter from a realistic point of view if you agree with the premise, if you agree that the chances of our team to have significant success this year and next year are small (I'm talking about reaching the playoffs and possibly the 2nd round) and you agree that the chances a superstar will sign for a team he wasn't been able to win with are very low than your options are either to roll with it till the bitter end (which is probably not a good idea) or make the most ouf of this crappy situation while it's possible.

I'm not sure we won't waste the next group of players, but I think we deserve that chance- because I see very little value in continuing in the same route knowing that the most probable outcome is us trading Cousins a year from now for much less.

For your last question (why not stick with the superstar you have?), I think a lot of you are stuck in the blame part... "it's the organization fault and not his", "you don't dump your supermodel girlfriend"...and I agree- but what the point in that?

We can't execute the same plan, because we don't have the time or assets to do that... again, this year we will probably won't make the playoffs which leave us with one season before he'll have only 1 year on his contract left and his value will drop- the alternative gives you much more time, cap sace and delay the schedule making it possible to start something different.
You said that this only make sense if Cuz quits on this team and you are partly right, the way I see it- even if he doesn't demand a trade, I can't see him resigning here- I have no precedent for someone of his level resigning for a team that sucked this bad.

I don't agree with the bolded part at all. In fact, I stipulate that for that "success" to happen you NEED Big Cuz more than anything else. I also am very confident that if we show improvement in game planning and focus on defense, even if we miss playoffs this year, then both DMC and Rondo will be happy to come back next year and make that final push. You severely underestimate DMC's sense of loyalty (which he's shown and proven time and again over the past 5 years) and you seem to see a total reset as the only solution, when there's a much simpler (and proven) solution right in front of you. This team has the talent to compete, what it lacks is focus and discipline to do so, and that is on the coaching staff. And if you do decide to reset, I don't see how DMC's value is going to be lower in 2 years in the last year of his contract. If Kevin Love was able to fetch some nice pieces, I'm sure Big Cuz will as well.
 
OK, so we've got DMC and yes he's an amazing player and nobody questions that. But we've replaced everyone else and he is the only common denominator. Also, our opposing teams don't have Cousins and they whip the Kings every night. But I'll trust Vlade. If he wants to keep him and keep building around him, that's fine. If not, that's fine too

If, for six years, all of your meals consist of steak and rotting garbage pulled out of dumpsters, do you trade the steak for more rotting garbage because you're getting the poo poo every night?

Cuz isnt the only common denominator. Cuz + bad personnel/bad decisions/bad coaching have been the common denominators. This has been a laughably (well, not so funny for us Kings fans) poorly run franchise.

I'll agree with you on the trust Vlade front though. I think he did a bang up job this summer. Too bad Karl is ruining it. IF we trade Cuz, I think Vlade will maximize the return. I just dont think the maximum return will be better than Cuz.

It sucks though, the big fella is definitely frustrated, and his attitude has been awful. Might be an interesting trade season. There will definitely be rumors of a Cuz trade, if nothing else.
 
If, for six years, all of your meals consist of steak and rotting garbage pulled out of dumpsters, do you trade the steak for more rotting garbage because you're getting the poo poo every night?

Cuz isnt the only common denominator. Cuz + bad personnel/bad decisions/bad coaching have been the common denominators.
This has been a laughably (well, not so funny for us Kings fans) poorly run franchise.

Simply liking this isn't enough. I'm quoting it for emphasis.
 
Simply liking this isn't enough. I'm quoting it for emphasis.

I will play the other side.

I do not think that we have bad personnel, bad decisions or bad coaching this year and we are still not very good. It is what makes this year the most frustrating of all.

Also, all the cries of DMC being misunderstood and misused by his coaches, GMs, media and is surrounded by poor players got old a long time ago. Even it were true, if he is as bad a** as advertised he should be able to get this team at least 40 wins on his own. Maybe not a title contender, but a 1st ballot HOF and best big in 20 years should be able to get you 40 wins by himself and we have not sniffed any where close to that for many years.

I am beyond tired of excuses.
 
I don't agree with the bolded part at all. In fact, I stipulate that for that "success" to happen you NEED Big Cuz more than anything else. I also am very confident that if we show improvement in game planning and focus on defense, even if we miss playoffs this year, then both DMC and Rondo will be happy to come back next year and make that final push. You severely underestimate DMC's sense of loyalty (which he's shown and proven time and again over the past 5 years) and you seem to see a total reset as the only solution, when there's a much simpler (and proven) solution right in front of you. This team has the talent to compete, what it lacks is focus and discipline to do so, and that is on the coaching staff. And if you do decide to reset, I don't see how DMC's value is going to be lower in 2 years in the last year of his contract. If Kevin Love was able to fetch some nice pieces, I'm sure Big Cuz will as well.

Just to make it clear- my point wasn't that in order to get significant success in the near future you need to trade Cousins, it was that the chances are low it will happen with (or without) him considering how our team has looked, and since the window is closing (which I guess is something we disagree on) I can see a value in making a move.
About the loyalty part, on the one side you say that the organization is what caused us to be bad for years and kept Cousins from any form of success (and you are right about it) and on ther other you expect him to sign up for more of that even though I can't think of one example of a player doing something similair in the past.

Now to the Kevin Love issue, because I thought about mentioning that earlier, the Love trade was pure luck for Minnesota- the way you describe it you would think teams were lining up to give them lucrative offers when in reality a lot had to break right- I'll let Flip (RIP) describe it:

Then things kind of fell into place, with LeBron going to Cleveland and [Andrew] Wiggins becoming available. That’s when you can say “lucky.”
and in another interview:
“We were in a situation where if LeBron doesn’t go to Cleveland, do we trade him? Probably not,” Saunders said.

If you remember the only serious suiters were GS who didn't want to offer Klay Thompson (basically offering Barnes and David Lee). at that point the Wolves management was willing to let his contract play out for the possibility he MIGHT sign for them.... that's not a good spot to be in.

Stars value being lower on shorter contracts is completely logical and is pretty much a fact.
Who would you rather trade for- the guy who has 3 years on his contract or the one that can bolt at the end of the year?
 
I will play the other side.

I do not think that we have bad personnel, bad decisions or bad coaching this year and we are still not very good. It is what makes this year the most frustrating of all.

Also, all the cries of DMC being misunderstood and misused by his coaches, GMs, media and is surrounded by poor players got old a long time ago. Even it were true, if he is as bad a** as advertised he should be able to get this team at least 40 wins on his own. Maybe not a title contender, but a 1st ballot HOF and best big in 20 years should be able to get you 40 wins by himself and we have not sniffed any where close to that for many years.

I am beyond tired of excuses.

I think the OP was referring to the past 5 years primarily.

Other than that, you're certainly entitled to your opinion and your feelings.
 
I will play the other side.

I do not think that we have bad personnel, bad decisions or bad coaching this year and we are still not very good. It is what makes this year the most frustrating of all.

Also, all the cries of DMC being misunderstood and misused by his coaches, GMs, media and is surrounded by poor players got old a long time ago. Even it were true, if he is as bad a** as advertised he should be able to get this team at least 40 wins on his own. Maybe not a title contender, but a 1st ballot HOF and best big in 20 years should be able to get you 40 wins by himself and we have not sniffed any where close to that for many years.

I am beyond tired of excuses.

No, nobody but a Top 10 all time guy would be able to take a team that has gone 7-35 without him and turn them into some .500 team. And not even all fo them in all liklihood.

one thing about Cousins being out as often as he has been as we have a large body of evidence of just how godawful the rosters around him have been without him on the floor. 7-35 = 42 games, that's more than half a season of evidence. A .166 win% = 13.7 wins a season for the team without Cuz. Asking a single player to come in and add 27 wins by himself, to triple his team's win% is just about impossible. Maybe Bron at his peak.

Even so, if Cousins is healthy these last few years, plays all 82, this team comes a lot closer to .500 than its been. about 34 wins or so if he plays 82, compared to 14 if he plays 0. That's pretty massive.
 
Last edited:
Just to make it clear- my point wasn't that in order to get significant success in the near future you need to trade Cousins, it was that the chances are low it will happen with (or without) him considering how our team has looked, and since the window is closing (which I guess is something we disagree on) I can see a value in making a move.
About the loyalty part, on the one side you say that the organization is what caused us to be bad for years and kept Cousins from any form of success (and you are right about it) and on ther other you expect him to sign up for more of that even though I can't think of one example of a player doing something similair in the past.

Yeah, I fully get your point, I just completely disagree that a) we're anywhere near the point of abandoning ship; and b) there's nothing that can be done to salvage the situation except blowing everything up (which is what even exploring trades for DMC will amount to). Does anyone really believe that the organization (I'm including FO and the coaches here) put DMC and the rest of the team in the best position to succeed this year and that they simply failed? Unless your answer is a resounding YES to this, you do not blow things up - you look for ways to solve the problem.

On loyalty - I don't see the contradiction at all. Big Cuz feels a lot of loyalty to the city and the fans, that much is indisputable. He also saw Vlade clean house of various rodents extremely effectively and bring in talent and personalities that mesh with DeMarcus very well. Finally, Vivek seems to have learned his place and shut up for a change. I'd be extremely surprised if Cuz in any way, shape or form holds the past regime's misgivings against Vlade at this point. There's nobody (except a certain coach) in this whole organization who DMC would have a beef with. I don't understand how you can think Cuz wouldn't feel loyal to the current org, considering the kind of human being he is. That's part of why we're so ****ing lucky to have him!

And regarding KLove trade - if you don't think teams will be lining up to trade for DMC if we do decide to pull the plug, I don't know what to tell you.

EDIT to add: just wanted to note that it's good to have a civil discussion regardless of our feelings on any particular subject. Carry on!
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I fully get your point, I just completely disagree that a) we're anywhere near the point of abandoning ship; and b) there's nothing that can be done to salvage the situation except blowing everything up (which is what even exploring trades for DMC will amount to). Does anyone really believe that the organization (I'm including FO and the coaches here) put DMC and the rest of the team in the best position to succeed this year and that they simply failed? Unless your answer is a resounding YES to this, you do not blow things up - you look for ways to solve the problem.

We'll have to agree to disagree about the point we are now in, but what bothers me is that you seem to once again confuse blame with looking at the situation we are in, I don't think that the organization did a good job, but I also think there are very limited tools to fix the problems in the time left so it doesn't really matter (no trade assets, unwillingness to part with the coach for obvious reasons and a what looks like going to be another lottery year).

On loyalty - I don't see the contradiction at all. Big Cuz feels a lot of loyalty to the city and the fans, that much is indisputable. He also saw Vlade clean house of various rodents extremely effectively and bring in talent and personalities that mesh with DeMarcus very well. Finally, Vivek seems to have learned his place and shut up for a change. I'd be extremely surprised if Cuz in any way, shape or form holds the past regime's misgivings against Vlade at this point. There's nobody (except a certain coach) in this whole organization who DMC would have a beef with. I don't understand how you can think Cuz wouldn't feel loyal to the current org, considering the kind of human being he is. That's part of why we're so ****ing lucky to have him!

Let me rephrase that- can you bring up another star player that played for a team that was this bad for that long and opted to stay?
You talk about Cousins like he is your childhood friend, he might be a great guy, but I don't expect him to stay here if he has a better option in a different place- and have no reason to believe he'll do so.

And regarding KLove trade - if you don't think teams will be lining up to trade for DMC if we do decide to pull the plug, I don't know what to tell you.
You brought up the KLove trade, and I showed you that it wasn't as simple as you made it up to be, now do I believe teams would like to trade for Cousins regardless of his contract details? absolutely.
Are the offers going to be the same? absolutely not.
 
That's a poisoning the well kind of question: no team in the NBA has been as poorly managed as we have, for as long as we have, with or without a star.

That might be true (and might work for my argument)... but I meant it more in term of finding a star player on a bad team (even a mediocre playoff team) that opted to stay in that team.

If you look at most NBA stars in recent history, they all left teams that weren't clear title contenders.
 
That might be true (and might work for my argument)... but I meant it more in term of finding a star player on a bad team that opted to stay in that team.

If you look at most NBA stars in recent history, they all left teams that weren't clear title contenders.

Walter Payton is the closest thing that comes to mind.
 
We'll have to agree to disagree about the point we are now in, but what bothers me is that you seem to once again confuse blame with looking at the situation we are in, I don't think that the organization did a good job, but I also think there are very limited tools to fix the problems in the time left so it doesn't really matter (no trade assets, unwillingness to part with the coach for obvious reasons and a what looks like going to be another lottery year).
I guess in my mind, what you call "assigning blame" means "identifying the problem" - so if you're asking me how I would address the current situation if I were the GM, here it is: the problem is with coaching, pure and simple. Make sure you have DMC/Rondo/Rudy's buy-in on the following and then get to work. Unofficially give GK an ultimatum to step back and allow a defensive assistant (existing or brought in) to prioritize defense for the rest of the year. Just let Rondo orchestrate the offense and run film sessions (I'm not even half-kidding about it). Force Chad Iske to lock in rotations and stop the small ball nonsense. Sure, GK becomes a lame-duck coach but everyone saves face until the off-season (and I guarantee you our record improves by then).

None of the above sounds very diplomatic (I'm not the diplomatic type) but that's just the overall vector; I trust Vlade to know exactly who to talk to and what to say.

Let me rephrase that- can you bring up another star player that played for a team that was this bad for that long and opted to stay?
You talk about Cousins like he is your childhood friend, he might be a great guy, but I don't expect him to stay here if he has a better option in a different place- and have no reason to believe he'll do so.
I do not know Big Cuz personally, but I feel like I understand him very well (similar personalities). I may make some assumptions but am yet to be proven wrong in watching him these past 5 years. Let me put it this way - Cuz will not leave until we give him a very good reason to do so (Karl and Pete came very close to it last Spring). Loyalty means everything to him but it has to go both ways, which is what Vlade understands very well.

You brought up the KLove trade, and I showed you that it wasn't as simple as you made it up to be, now do I believe teams would like to trade for Cousins regardless of his contract details? absolutely.
Are the offers going to be the same? absolutely not.
Your argument works against you here. What if Minny panicked early and dumped KLove a year before they did? LeBron doesn't yet force his way back to Cavs, and Minny gets pennies on the dollar. My point was, if you have a Top 10 player on your hands, you'll be in the position of power when negotiating any deal, regardless. Unless, of course, you manage to irreparably damage your relationship with him, but that's a whole different problem.
 
Cousins needs to change his entire game. He's just not efficient for a big.

If I told you there was a player who scored 25pts, but only .408 shooting FG, you'd think he's a chucking guard...

Well that crap is Cousins. .400 is unacceptable for a center in any degree. He needs to change it real quick. Of his 19 shots, only 4 come from 3pt line, so it's not entirely on the fault of him shooting 3s.

He needs to become a much much wiser basketball player. He's forcing too much and he's straight up chucking the ball. He gets an excuse because he's not Isaiah Thomas. Imagine if we had Thomas taking 19shots a game averaging 25pts, but only barely 40% shooting. Everyone would hate him. It's sounding like Josh Smith in Detroit...

I'd rather decrease Cousins' usage, and increase Ben's or Rondo's usage. He has the 2nd highest usage of any NBA player right now.
 
Cousins needs to change his entire game. He's just not efficient for a big.

If I told you there was a player who scored 25pts, but only .408 shooting FG, you'd think he's a chucking guard...

Well that poopoo is Cousins. .400 is unacceptable for a center in any degree. He needs to change it real quick. Of his 19 shots, only 4 come from 3pt line, so it's not entirely on the fault of him shooting 3s.

He needs to become a much much wiser basketball player. He's forcing too much and he's straight up chucking the ball. He gets an excuse because he's not Isaiah Thomas. Imagine if we had Thomas taking 19shots a game averaging 25pts, but only barely 40% shooting. Everyone would hate him.

Your argument completely falls on its face just as soon as you make it to anyone who has watched the Kings play for longer than 5 weeks here.

DeMarcus Cousins isn't a .408 shooter. George Karl or that newbie offensive gimmickmeister he's using as an offensive coordinator may be however. There's one thing that has changed in 2015-16, and its not the center who has been here 5 years and was shooting around .500 at this time last year on a variety of inside thudding.
 
Your argument completely falls on its face just as soon as you make it to anyone who has watched the Kings play for longer than 5 weeks here.

DeMarcus Cousins isn't a .408 shooter. George Karl or that newbie offensive gimmickmeister he's using as an offensive coordinator may be however. There's one thing that has changed in 2015-16, and its not the center who has been here 5 years and was shooting around .500 at this time last year on a variety of inside thudding.
Why cherry pick the stats from exactly this time, last year? I think it has A LOT to do with the way he scores on offense. In the previous 5 years, he only had 1 year where he shot at least .500.

Stats don't like bud.

http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
 
It doesn't matter if we get a team of all-stars if we don't play to the strength of the personnel. What's the point of having Shaq or Duncan if you ask them to set screens beyond the arc and to put up 5 3PTA per game?
 
Why cherry pick the stats from exactly this time, last year? I think it has A LOT to do with the way he scores on offense. In the previous 5 years, he only had 1 year where he shot at least .500.

Stats don't like bud.

http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/career/

You cherry picked stats from this time this year to make a dubious point. Which is either blatantly dishonest or blatantly ignorant.

And no, Cousins is not a natural .500 shooter, although he had followed a natural longterm progression in that direction right up until the Gerbil and the idiot owner stuck their fingers into things last winter because they didn't like progressions and wanted to play wannabe Warrior/Nuggets.

Cousins yr by yr FG% progression:
Yr 1: .430
Yr2: .448 +.018
Yr3: .465 +.017
Yr4: .496 +.031
Yr 5 pre-Malone firing: .512 +.016
<--------------------------------------Idiot Smallballers **** Things Up
Yr 5 post Malone firing: .454 -.058
Yr 6: .408 -.046

Then the morons fired the coach and starting running through junkball system after junkball system and gee, shocker, maybe that isn't the way to use a 270lb center. Which everybody who isn't a moron already knew.
 
Last edited:
I say Cousin's is seen on a good note considering the Jazz game played. Was obviously exhausted. Was effective. And guess what! His 3pt% went up. When's the last time that's happened!

Although. The Jazz just transitioned to not having Gobert. Hopefully he dominates the Knicks..
 
Against the Jazz Cousins played how he should have for the past 6 years he made simple moves and plays and took few jumpers while completely locking down Dfavs on the other end most times they matched up. Cousins just needs to play similar to his role on team USA, stop shooting any mid range jumper or 3 pointer just camp in the paint and use that 300 pounds and elite hands.

He made everyone better and was always creating 2 on 1 situations with his passing out of the paint which ended freeing him up in return for offensive boards.

Its quiet distrubing that in 6 years hes never learned a consistant jump hook and has wasted his time in bricking the majority of his mid range jumpers and taking terrible forced shots he never needed to take.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top