Webb did make waves in Philly, and face it, he has always had a problem saying things in the media that are probably best left unsaid, but I do think he tried to fit into there system. And, I strongly believe that if a Vlade like role had been open in Philly, he would have embraced it. Philly's offense (with AI) didn't really facilitate the kind of teamwork the Kings had that made Vlade's role so vital and successful.The problem in Philly is their system never worked towards Webb's strengths, and that made it a disaster for everyone involved. After AI left it was clear that Philly was focusing on rebuilding for the future, and that makes it very clear that Webb doesn't have much to offer the team.
I agree with this statement, but would also point out that when Philly brought CWebb in they weren't looking for someone to take the stepped-down Vlade role --- they wanted a second consistent scorer to team with AI to improve the team. As it turned out, CWebb was not the right person to be that second scorer because his legs weren't allowing him to play offense as efficiently as he once did (and neither was AI's pound the ball for 18 seconds and either shot or pass to a guy for a end-of-the-shot-clock shot). Add to that the fact that his knee problems further prevented him from playing any type of respective defense, the fact that other players had trouble fitting in with AI on offense (especially Iguodala), and that the team had no real defensive identity due to the fact that the other players couldn't cover up for the weaknesses of AI and CWebb on defense, and it basically turned into a quest for individual numbers for just about everyone involved.
Then, the Sixers basically did nothing in the offseason to try to prevent a reoccurrence of the prior year. So, surprise surprise, the Sixers started off terribly and had no team chemistry, especially with a guy like AI who has been the ruling member of the team for the last 10 years.
Granted, CWebb shares plenty of blame for the results of the past two years, but it's not as if he has sabotaged a taylor-made opportunity to succeed in Philly (both from a team perspective and personally).
I agree that there is a disconnect in his mind between the player he was, the player he is, and the player he thinks he is. And, it is sad to watch. It's kind of like Jerry Rice finally retiring, honestly surprised that he can no longer make the 2nd string. When a player lives and breathes a sport, it's got to be hard when their body can no longer produce what their mind thinks is possible. It's still hard for me to accept that the Kings never got a championship after coming so close

, I'm sure it's even harder for the players to let go of their dreams.
Word. I think CWebb certainly needs to take a step back and realize that maintaining his career 20 ppg 10 rpg averages will be very difficult from here on out (or at least that the 20 ppg average will be).
I do think that part of CWebb's problem in accepting his limitations is the fact that the 76ers roster is not one to actually highlight his limitations. He may not quite have the physical abilities of the other bigs on the Sixers roster, but not one of them has half of his basketball IQ/feel for the game, and while those are things that can in part be learned with time and practice, a fair portion of those abilities are somewhat ingrained long before a player reaches the NBA. Dalembert has plenty of talent, and could be a real defensive force, but he commits silly fouls, plays with poor positioning, and lacks focus. Hunter also has abilities, but is one of those bigs that is a poor rebounder (for whatever reason). May be if CWebb were now joining a team with those guys, and the team were a contender, he would more quickly embrace a mentoring role and 15 minutes per game of playing time. However, imho, that role was difficult to accept when that was not the reason he was brought to Philly.
I think it's slightly different than Rice's situation in that CWebb knows he can still perform as well or better than his competition if provided with the right opportunity.
And, I honestly thought that the Andre Miller trade would be good for CWebb, not because he would become the #1 offensive option with AI's departure, but because the team could become a team that shared the ball more effectively on offense, which would create better opportunities for everyone on offense, CWebb included. I think in one of the only games he played with AMiller he had his most efficient game in sometime (shooting 9-13 from the field).
But for whatever reason, the two sides agreed that a parting at this point was best. I think Philly has definitely decided to assemble a cast this season that will compete each night it takes the floor, but due to its talent level, will lose most of those games. I think they are all in on the Oden sweepstakes at this point, and I cannot blame them one bit.
I share your concerns about where Cwebb goes from here. He is saying the right things about wanting to pass more and score less, and I do believe that the right team could use his abilities. A Vlade type role would be ideal for his capabilities, and it's where he would add the most value, I just don't know that there's really that type of position available on a contender, which is where he wants to be. I think it would be a stretch for him to find a Vlade role, where he is a starter and an integral part of the offense, but I wish him the best. It will certainly be interesting to see where he ends up.
IMHO, his best opportunity to take this type of roll would be in LA (unfortunately or fortunately). I read an interesting take on a Lakers forum about CWebb never having played for a coach that emphasizes discipline over offense (or at least never having played for such a coach with Phil's stature/track record). I agree with this, and am now starting to believe that LA would be his best chance to succeed, both because he has no choice other than to accept a Vlade-esque roll because of the presence of Kobe and Odom and because Phil may be the coach to finally get CWebb to recognize he needs to not only talk the talk, but walk the walk of contributing not by scoring, but in other ways.